In our daily study and work life, many people have written papers, which can cultivate our scientific research ability. So how do you write a good paper? The following is an argumentative paper about Qu Yuan that I collected for you. I welcome your reference and hope it will help you. Argumentative essay on Qu Yuan 1
Qu Yuan is a man worthy of admiration. May I ask China's four major festivals, the Spring Festival, which is the end of one year and the beginning of a new year: Qingming Festival, which is to pay homage to dead relatives and friends; Mid-Autumn Festival, which is a difficult festival to reunite with family members, and Qu Yuan alone can make a Dragon Boat Festival in memory of him ... It's really amazing, unprecedented! I don't admire it, okay? For thousands of years in China, Qu Yuan really influenced the bone marrow.
Qu Yuan is a respectable person. He was brilliant in literary talent, led thousands of poets by himself, was extremely upright, never compromised in fighting evil forces, and was a great man who devoted himself to his country all his life. No matter whether he was "appointed by Wang" or "trapped", he would always be faithful to his motherland and never regret it until his death. It is such a romantic poet who is talented in governing the country, patriotic and upright.
However, he is not worth learning and setting an example for me.
Qu Yuan is a pedantic person. I really admire and even look up to his "loyalty", but it is just "foolish loyalty". There is nothing wrong with being loyal when "Wang is appointed"; But when the whole princes and nobles began to oppose you and abandon you, they still looked like they were sold and counted money for others, even though there was no way to go.
"You told me to die, but I had to die." These Confucian ethics were not prevalent at the time of the Warring States Period. It was this great poet Qu Da, Qu Da, who was a loyal minister, who deeply and unreservedly filled this "greatness" and "justice" thought into this "greater" and "more just" traditional moral concept. I would like to ask: Confucius said, benevolence, righteousness, courtesy, wisdom and faith, where is loyalty?
In this way, Qu Yuan's story has become a beautiful biography, a Chinese virtue, immortal, a ruling tool for emperors from generation to generation, a moral model for thousands of people, and a memorial object for people to celebrate the festive season! Without Miluo's jump to serve the country, perhaps, it can only be said that Yue Fei would not have died tragically in Fengbo Pavilion, and it would not be impossible to take the Huanglong. There would not be so many heroes who could not die in the battlefield and died in the tragedy of imperial conspiracy! No matter what the purpose or original intention of Qu Yuan's Miluo jump was, he wanted to shock the motherland severely, to watch the tragedy of the declining rivers in Chu, or to simply get rid of it passively, but his influence was enormous and unprecedented! Such a great man, the better his own character, the greater the disaster! Bad people are evil, for a while, for a lifetime: good people are evil, for a generation, for a nation! The "curse" of good people-the glorious deeds of those good people, intentionally or unintentionally, have become the trump cards for emperors to capture the anger of the people. The emperors have stood on the commanding heights of morality, and everyone is loyal to them. This kind of "loyalty" is considered great by the parties, and so is the world. Only the emperor's wind is light and the clouds are light, and his heart is disdainful: it's just a loyal dog!
this terrible phenomenon has lasted for more than two thousand years!
Qu Yuan is wronged, and the negative influence of his gentleman's conduct will never be known if the Miluo River runs dry. Let Qu Yuan be quiet and talk less about his "handed down virtues", so that he can become a person worthy of admiration and respect instead of being imitated and set an example! Argumentative essay on Qu Yuan 2
I always feel that Qu Yuan's death is really not worth it. I understand what he has done, but I don't agree with such an extreme practice.
Qu Yuan thinks highly of himself, and this conclusion can be easily drawn from the words "Levin is a descendant of Emperor Li Sao", "I am blessed with a good name for Yu" and "I have both inner beauty and cultivation" in Li Sao. It's normal for an "intellectual" to be lofty, but it's unnecessary to be too modest, so there is neither courage nor demeanor. His ideal is also very beautiful, "don't care about the strong to abandon the filth, come to my doffer first." Although he had such ideals and talents, he didn't meet the "Lord". He threw himself into the river when the western hills of Chu were dying, but it might not be worth it.
First of all, I hold a negative attitude towards the argument that "Chu was the most unjust when Qin destroyed the Six Kingdoms". Since it is a vassal regime, the law of the jungle is a normal thing. Chu Huaiwang was stupid enough, what he did was outrageous enough, and he didn't know how to be good at what he did. In the end, he couldn't be wronged if he came to a miserable end. It is unfair to other countries that the country led by such a monarch is not destroyed.
So my point is that Qu Yuan's behavior, although a large part of it comes from his feelings for the sufferings of the people's livelihood in Chu, is not divorced from the category of foolish loyalty.
As Guan Zhong said, he could "be ashamed of his fame and fortune without covering it." At that time, it was normal for counselors to be loyal to different princes. It is not easy to reform politics, and it is even more difficult to reform without bloodshed. It is impossible to reform on one's own when the monarch does not reuse it. If he really loves this land and the people here, he should find another Lord. The best way is to help them capture Chu land with less killing and reduce wars and unnecessary casualties. After his death, it can only show that his realm has not reached the point where "the world is famous without advice, and the world is not depressed." There is an injustice for Song Rongzi here, but why people like him are not famous. Of course, this is much ado about nothing, and Song Rongzi himself won't care about it.
if it's not for a wise monarch, then loyalty to the country is meaningless. Are there fewer courtiers killed like Wu Zixu? He should love the country, the land and the people, not his politics and monarch. In that case, it seems not a bad idea to take refuge in other countries. After all, it may be better for the people.
In any case, Qu Yuan finally chose to die, leaving a memorable theme for future generations. No one will know what Qu Yuan, who stood by the river, thought. Maybe he had enough reasons to die, but we just didn't know or didn't think of it. Therefore, we can't make any objective evaluation of his death from the perspective of personal freedom or his own realistic situation. Everything we say is subjective because of our own association.
I don't understand and don't want to understand Qu Yuan's loneliness. Argumentative essay on Qu Yuan 3
I think Qu Yuan is a very stubborn person.
Quyuan, with the same surname as Chu Huaiwang, is a royal family of Chu. Therefore, he is only loyal to Chu. This is not his stubbornness. I think this is a kind of outlook on life and values. Qu Yuan may think that he wants to make Chu stronger than a good life and rich salary. Even if you can't show any achievements on the political stage of Chu, it's good to help. This is probably Qu Yuan's idea and his way to realize the value of life. Qu Yuan's real stubbornness lies in that he trusts King Huai too much and believes that King Huai will wake up one day. He trusts himself too much and believes that he can wake up King Huai one day.
In order to make the State of Chu strong, Qu Yuan tried his best to show his talent, and finally he could make King Huai "trust" him. However, more people in the imperial court paid more attention to fame and fortune, so they slandered King Huai, and Qu Yuan was abandoned by King Huai at once. I think Qu Yuan should be very clear. If King Huai really trusts him, he won't alienate him because of one or two slanders. Only emperors who don't know the people around them will listen to others' slanders at will. Qu Yuan should have realized how much King Huai didn't pay attention to the virtuous officials and care about the people around him. But he stubbornly believes that these are all done by villains, who make King Huai unable to hear and see clearly. Even though he was alienated and abandoned by Huai Wang, Qu Yuan was still willing to believe in Huai Wang.
When Zhang Yi cheated on Huai Wang, Qu Yuan had been deposed and was not in the official position. Although he was not with King Huai, he still learned about it. Qu yuan watched the greedy Huai Wang do something stupid again. He only made a suggestion: "Why not kill Zhang Yi?" Although it is only a sentence that is too late, it is enough to show Qu Yuan's loyalty and insight.
But King Huai didn't listen to Qu Yuan until the end. How dangerous it is for King Zhao of Qin to marry Chu and let Chu Huaiwang go to Wuguan to meet Qin. The generals of Chu have been injured one after another, and Qin is a country of tigers and wolves. Qu Yuan's most sincere advice was ignored by Huai Wang, which led to the death of Huai Wang.
Qu Yuan was alienated from Huai Wang and wrote Li Sao. At this time, his mood is not anger but sadness. This is the best proof of his stubbornness towards King Huai. He was "loyal and slandered" but still believed in King Huai, who happened to be an incompetent king who couldn't appoint a good minister. Qu Yuan's stubbornness is almost meaningless.
Qu Yuan is obsessed with the object-Huai Wang, not a wise man, so Qu Yuan should not be so obsessed with himself. He knows that his own "Huai Jin holds Yu" Huai Wang can't be seen at all, but he is still stubborn to the end. To save the country under the rule of King Huai, this is not just a goal that can be achieved without collusion. If Qu Yuan can not be so stubborn about the king of Chu and himself, and think of some other ways, maybe the final result will be different. An argumentative essay on Qu Yuan 4
Qu Yuan is a thin-skinned person.
I have to admit that some people can't stand a little worldly pollution, and at the same time, they hope to be favored by fate and make friends with the same noble people. When neither of the above two wishes can be realized, the lofty Qu Yuan will definitely leave the dirty world he thinks.
Whether this death is worth it or not, this courage alone is enough to make future generations respect it. This is a respect for one's personality. It shows that one is a phoenix that lives by picking branches, and one can't muddle through the world.
Qu Yuan's mood of throwing himself into the river should be extremely sad, calm and rational, and thoughtful, not impulsive. Now that you have made up your mind to die, why be impatient? Take another look at the great rivers and mountains of Chu, which was opened by my ancestors. The autumn wind is bleak, and the west wind is getting tighter. The reeds in the distance join hands with the reeds in the vicinity to open an autumn net, which condenses the whole person's sorrow into an unusually soft heart. Once this heart is dissolved in the gurgling, it dyes the whole river bitter, and the water is in the same vein. Any ladle of water reminds the Chu people of their home country and the country, and reminds them of the irreversible ending.
It has been two thousand years, passed down from generation to generation, and with the propaganda of the ruling class who likes "blind patriotism", Qu Yuan has become a model of so-called patriotism.
People won't accuse Qu Yuan of patriotism, although it was an era that paid more attention to the individual rather than the country. It was a dynasty where there was happiness and where there was success, the country was home. "Phoenix flies in a thousand miles, and looks down at Dehui." Not many people like Qu Yuan died for the country where they were born.
Next, I want to talk about Qu Yuan's point of view. In Qu Yuan's view, only noble birds such as the phoenix can express their opinions, and mediocre birds can behave themselves. A fine horse doesn't need a rope, and a lame donkey certainly has to work. After reading this, I can't help calling the mediocrity unfair. I agree to give the genius room for free development, but at the same time, we should also respect the mediocrity. In fact, the concern and respect for the mediocrity and the weak can better reflect the human beauty of a nation. In a sense, China culture is an elite culture. From "there is a great scholar in laughter, but there is no Bai Ding in communication" to "there is no shortage of millet in the world, and there is no shortage of phoenix", it seems that all the people in Xialiba can't communicate with each other.
From a Qu Yuan, we can actually see that many problems, such as the persistence of personality, the choice of family and country, and the shortcomings of traditional thoughts, are different from Sima Qian's sudden loss, but I am suddenly enlightened. On Quyuan's argumentative essay 5
There are only two ways before Quyuan: one is to go with the times, and the other is to stick to moral integrity. Qu Yuan chose the second one without hesitation.
to get to this point, he needs great courage: what he needs to abandon is his life and his country. He has clearly realized that the blood line of the family that once named his ancestors "Qu" has irrevocably declined. The stupid and absurd king who once served will eventually die in another country; The newly established king has intensified his efforts. Instead of using him, he has been demoted as far away as possible. As a loyal courtier, what is there to say? No longer "bend" for it, you can only devote yourself to the world you fantasize about. According to the etiquette, it is a great sin that the courtiers are not loyal. Qu Yuan also has this idea. Even in the pure land he created, he will not hide his sense of guilt and guilt. This is the price of resolutely serving the country. Sticking to that lofty ambition, who can know that pain?
and giving up is only in a moment. The scene of the dialogue between the fisherman and Qu Yuan is still vivid. Although it is impossible to verify whether there is such a time in history, it shows from the side that the "saints" at that time often passed away from the world. The "saints" floated in the world and lived the life of the original Taoist prototype. If something goes wrong and you enter the WTO, you can do whatever you want, and your heart is empty, and you can become a "saint". What's the pleasure? Giving up integrity is as simple as taking a bath. In a blink of an eye, my heart is washed away without reservation. In Qu Yuan's view, this is never acceptable. "Going to Kunlun to eat jade and jade, living with the heavens and the earth, and shining with the sun and the moon", how imposing it is to confess the ideal! Surrounded by such thoughts, how can you think about drag out an ignoble existence? If you drag out an ignoble existence, how can you live with heaven and earth and shine with the sun and the moon? I would rather save myself in despair than be a courtier who gave up morality and lost his conscience.
Qu Yuan saw all this thoroughly. "You don't need to be loyal, and you don't need to be virtuous." People who are loyal and virtuous will also be born at an inopportune time. Since you can't contribute your own strength, it is more meaningful to sink into the world where you will no longer despair than to live in the world with guilt. People who have confidence in the future will definitely choose to stick to it.
in the hundreds of years after him, the vassals were in melee, and it was no longer peaceful. It was not until the establishment of the Han Dynasty where Sima Qian lived that the situation stabilized. Sima Qian, who was separated from Qu Yuan for a long time, also made the same choice with Qu Yuan. Being imprisoned, he insisted on keeping his ambition, but giving up at this time became death. When he died, he wouldn't have to suffer so much, so he was relieved. But what's the point? Qu Yuan, a predecessor, drowned himself just because he felt that he could not realize the value of life because he was floating in the world. At this time, Sima Qian only committed a shameful crime in a humble capacity similar to that of a eunuch. Everyone is as light as a feather. How can he ruin his precious life by saying "I don't want to live"? It is clear at a glance whether such a life is to stick to or give up. In the face of disaster, Sima Qian finally understood the meaning of life and death and stuck to his value as a historian.
further, I thought of Bruno in Italy. Until the moment I was burned to death, when the wind rolled up the fire, I said, "Fire can't conquer me! The future world will understand my value! " Make the die-hards tremble. Adhere to the truth, stand firm in his principles, and give up all opportunities to bow to the church. His achievements in history will be remembered forever.
this is what the great ancestors of mankind did. Facing the impact of reality, stick to yourself and never give up in order to go further. Argumentative essay on Qu Yuan 6
Qu Yuan is not.