Poetry criticism

(1) The whole article is magnificent, full of emotion, intense, rigorous in reasoning, sharp in words, clear in logic, interlocking, progressive at different levels, reaching the theme directly, and reading P.J Wen is endless and magnificent.

The language of the article is colloquial, easy to understand, easy to understand, well-founded and profound. Try to be concise in the choice of words and sentences, and read with a lively rhythm, catchy and memorable.

(3) The article uses analogical reasoning, asking questions repeatedly and step by step. The debate is rigorous and fluent, the style of writing is like a river, and the language is plain and simple, accurate and refined.

(4) The article is logical, clear and transparent. Passionate, imaginative, vivid and profound.

⑤ The article is ingenious, meticulous, good at refuting the positive theory, good at arguing and breaking the theory, good at using ordinary examples as arguments, and using metaphors to make abstract truths easy to understand, concrete and visualized, making abstruse truths easy to understand.

⑥ The words in the article are exquisite and concise, the sentence patterns are neat, the charm is smooth, and it is catchy to read. The style of writing is warm and lively, the words are beautiful and magnificent, and the artistic conception is profound.

⑦ The article is unpretentious, but frank and lengthy, revealing the core point directly. Illustrate the truth vividly with metaphors. The whole article is well-structured and persuasive, which naturally serves as a lesson.