Deconstruction architecture is the development of post-modern architecture since the late 1980s. Its uniqueness lies in the idea of fragmentation, the process of nonlinear design, and the interest in spending some time on structural surfaces or obviously non-Euclidean geometry, which is formed in the deformation and displacement of architectural design principles, such as some structures and building envelopes. The visual appearance of architecture has been described by unpredictable and uncontrollable chaos, and countless deconstructive styles have emerged.
Question 2: What are the characteristics of deconstruction? The biggest characteristics of deconstruction are anti-center, anti-authority, anti-binary opposition and anti-black and white theory.
In order to oppose metaphysics, logos center and even all closed and rigid systems, the deconstruction movement strongly advocates the dissolution of subject, the extension of meaning and the freedom of signifier. In other words, it emphasizes the free play of language and thought, even if this freedom is just a "dance with shackles". Apart from its rebellious nature, deconstruction is a self-contradictory theory. In Derrida's words, deconstruction is not existence, but traces. Hard to define, invisible, but everywhere. In other words, once deconstruction is defined or defined as what it is, it will be deconstructed by itself. The two basic characteristics of deconstruction are openness and non-finality. Deconstructing a sentence, a proposition, or a traditional belief is to destroy the philosophical basis it advocates and the hierarchical opposition it relies on by analyzing rhetorical methods. At the same time, we must see that the logic, methods and theories used in deconstruction are mostly borrowed from the metaphysical tradition. From this point of view, deconstruction is only a typical expedient measure, or an antagonistic strategy of dealing with a man as he deals with you.
Question 3: What is deconstruction design? Deconstruction is an important modern design style evolved from structuralism, which was created by designers in the post-modern period while exploring design forms and theories, and rose in the field of architectural design in the late 1980s. Its theoretical basis is the deconstruction philosophy founded by Derrida in 1960s.
Deconstructionist designers believe that design should fully express the local characteristics of the work, and the real integrity of the work should reside in the independent appearance of each component. Its architectural design pursues the obvious separation effect and independent characteristics of local components and three-dimensional space in terms of overall appearance, facade wall and interior design. The overall form of architecture and interior is mostly a combination of irregular geometric shapes, which either causes a sense of visual complexity or just a sense of clutter.
The following architectural designs are typical deconstruction designs:
Question 4: Deconstructionist Architecture About Constructivism (Art) Futurism (Art) Russian Futurism Postmodernism Vorticism Tom? Vlado Milunj? Deconstruction Constructivism Architecture Constructivism Futurism Postmodernism
Question 5: How are the architectural styles of modernism, postmodernism and deconstruction defined? Classical philosophy holds that there is something called "essence" hidden behind the "phenomenon" world, and all phenomena are realized through "essence". Knowledge is only the understanding of phenomena, so it is only a very, very small part of "essence". According to this statement, the purpose of reading the text is to dig the "essential meaning" of the text. In other words, it assumes that all cultures must have some kind of "origin", and the purpose of philosophical thinking is to find the "origin".
Deconstruction, or hermeneutics, points out that searching for "essential meaning" is a futile fantasy, understanding is bound to be misunderstanding, and reading is bound to be misreading. On the contrary, understanding and reading are another kind of writing carried out by readers. According to this view, culture is like a piece of paper, on which countless people write and daub, daub and write, and layer upon layer. The original things have long been completely covered. People keep writing and smearing, and the more they write, the more they write, and the things they write are being deleted and buried. In any case, it is impossible to find the original meaning of the text. Since all understanding is misunderstanding, how can we expect to reveal any "essence" in understanding? Therefore, the acquisition of knowledge is a process of "digestion" and "rewriting".
"Postmodernism" is characterized by the negation of meaning. On the premise of deconstruction, postmodernism deconstructs, subverts, blasphemes and teases the all-encompassing "big theory". They assert that there is no fundamental truth in any theory, and truth always exists relatively and is interpreted by different people in their own ways, so truth is described by different narrative illusions and phenomena are described by the languages of many different narrators. Therefore, "text" is only the * * of some symbols with deconstruction value waiting to be deconstructed, and knowledge is the patchwork arrangement and combination of these symbols.