The debate is about to begin! The host teacher humorously asked us to applaud the "host" and then announced the official start of the debate. First of all, XXX, the representative of the square, spoke: "I think it is beneficial to open books." The ancients said that' reading breaks thousands of books, and writing is like a god'. " On behalf of XXX, the opponent said, "I don't think reading books is necessarily beneficial, but reading some bad books is harmful." "
So-and-so in the square said, "Then why do you read bad books? ! "I said," Liu Xiang of the Han Dynasty once said,' Books are still medicine, and good study can cure fools'. This medicine is a good medicine and can cure all diseases. ; The other is the poison that kills people. " After that, a free debate began, and representatives of all parties spoke freely. Some students quarreled over a bad cartoon, but they soon got back to the subject.
The more people talk, the more excited and enthusiastic they are, so that the order is chaotic and the debate can't go on. The presiding teacher had to announce a timeout and a debate ended.
Although it didn't achieve the expected results, as far as students are concerned, we did make full preparations ...?
Six years of primary school life is coming to an end. In the past six years, I have experienced many ups and downs with my teachers and classmates, and I have also felt many sunny times. However, what I remember most is the debate about the development of science and technology: advantages or disadvantages.
The front debater first launched an "attack" on us: "I don't need to waste my breath on the benefits of scientific and technological development, and the other debater will be eloquent later." Nowadays, in our life, anything advanced is inseparable from the development of science and technology: for example, the communication tools we use now, such as mobile phones and telephones, are closely related to science and technology? If the development of science and technology is suspended, maybe now, you have to use flying pigeons to send books to contact your relatives and friends! "
Hearing this, our debater was immediately unhappy and said plausibly: "The subjective dependence of human beings on science and technology makes the disadvantages of science and technology arbitrary and explosive. This trend directly leads to the destruction of human power by science and technology. When human beings sing a song of triumph for science and technology, please don't forget that nothing is perfect, and technology can also give evil spirits the power of the devil. "
"..." After listening to our words, the other debater was speechless at once, but in a short time, a "hero" came out as an "emergency". He angrily opposed his opponent's point of view, with an expression: since the development of science and technology has great disadvantages, why should mankind continue to develop science and technology? Besides, today's machines and means of transportation facilitate our lives. Without these, how backward mankind should be! In addition, in medicine, science and technology have also played a role in saving lives. Doesn't this prove that scientific and technological development is of great benefit? "
The opponent's debater improvised and eloquently:? "However, due to the development of science and technology, human beings began to commit chronic suicide: cutting down trees, discharging sewage and waste gas, and seriously polluting the earth's environment. The television and computer invented by human beings fascinated many students, so they put on glasses. All this is caused by technology! "
The situation on the field has undergone subtle changes, but the good times did not last long, and soon the two sides began a tug-of-war of positions. Xiong Qianbo, red-faced and knowledgeable, is sometimes witty; Sometimes he retorts. Established a "strong bunker". Not to be outdone, the other party built the "Wan Li Great Wall"; Dig a "10,000-meter-long trench". In this way, the two sides are at loggerheads. No one can convince anyone and no one can refute anyone.
"Armistice between the two sides!" After listening to our debate, the teacher concluded: "In the future, we should make constant efforts to solve all the problems brought by science and technology and create a brand-new world!" "I know!" The students are in high spirits and immersed in intense study. Because everyone wants to solve the problems brought by technology when they grow up.
Time slipped away unconsciously and the bell rang. A wonderful debate is over.
People, in many cases, will struggle in the whirlpool of confusion between ideal and reality, and find their own direction after some tempering. Different people will choose different directions.
Be honest. From being sensible, parents, school teachers and textbooks are all true. What I remember most clearly is that my parents and teachers often told me to be an honest boy and an honest man! And we also follow this teaching, step into the society and guide our work, life and life. At this time, we found that many things are contrary to our education. In real work and life, it is impossible to be a truly honest person, because I have experienced that telling honest words not only hurts my friends or colleagues, but also makes me sad. On the contrary, if you say something against your will, everyone will be happy; Gradually found that, in fact, at some point in life, we need some white lies to deceive and comfort ourselves, so we also need to learn to be dishonest in appropriate occasions.
The origin of the phrase "an honest man boasting" cannot be verified, and an honest man is even less valued in modern society, although everyone knows that people should be honest; Reality will always give honest people a head-on blow, and the person who "simmers sweet potatoes" is high, which will level off; Those who are "exquisite in all directions" and thick-skinned will always benefit from saying no. Various practical experiences and personal experiences make fewer and fewer people willing to be honest, while more and more people know how to be flexible and tell white lies. Throughout the society, almost everything has two sides: bright and dark. It is normal to think about it, because society is tolerant and the essence of human nature can be fully displayed in today's society. "Bright" may or may not be the true self; "Darkness" is the true self.
Should a person insist on honesty? Should? ! That makes sense. Dishonesty is obviously lying to deceive others, which is an immoral behavior. Shouldn't it? ! That makes sense. Obviously, sometimes dishonest words are more acceptable and interpersonal relationships are easier to get along with than honest words. To be a truly honest and kind person will be confused by the following facts.
Being an honest person is the simplest essence of human nature. But in real life, we can't be completely honest. Sometimes we have to tell white lies, but we can't abandon the truth, goodness and beauty of human nature, let alone take white lies as a habit, blurt them out and be irresponsible. That will backfire, become a real liar, lose the trust of others, and lose the foundation of being a man. Don't forget another sentence: cleverness is better than honesty.
Everyone has his own principles of life. As a fool, you can't be a completely honest person, so be a man of your word and integrity.
Being too frank and inflexible will make us frustrated in interpersonal communication and produce some inevitable misunderstandings and contradictions; But if you insist on honesty, you won't. As long as you insist on being honest with each other, you will have good interpersonal relationships and gain the trust and goodwill of others.
Since the 20th century, great changes have taken place in science and technology, which have improved our lives. Now every household uses high-tech products. However, while enjoying high-tech life, human beings ignore it? Advantages and disadvantages of high-tech products.
Just like the batteries we use every day. In the past, when there was no battery, electricity could not be carried around, which brought inconvenience to our lives more or less. With the safety battery, electricity can be carried around, which has brought great help to our lives. However, if the waste batteries are discarded into nature without treatment, it will do great harm to nature. For example, a grain of button cell can pollute 600,000 liters of water, which is equivalent to the amount of water a person drinks in his life. A piece of rotten battery in the field can make a square meter of land useless, so it is not an exaggeration to say that a piece of waste battery is a "pollution bomb".
For example, the plastic bags we use every day. In the past, when there was no plastic belt, people could only pack vegetables in baskets, which was very troublesome and inconvenient. Since the appearance of plastic bags, it is much more convenient for people to buy food and things-just use plastic bags. However, when people use plastic bags, have they ever thought about its harm? Yes, degradable plastic bags are specially treated and will not cause harm to the environment. What about non-degradable plastic bags? According to the data, non-degradable garbage bags will do great harm to land and air after being buried and burned. Moreover, when recycling waste plastics, it is difficult to classify and it is not economical. ? Plastics are easy to burn, which will produce toxic gases and do great harm to the environment. Therefore, it is no exaggeration to call plastic bags "white pollution".
In addition, it has now entered the computers of thousands of households. Computers are very useful, such as looking up information, chatting and drawing ... but computers also radiate a lot. You know, radiation is harmful to human body. If your eyes don't rest on the computer screen for a long time, your eyes may be nearsighted. Think about how inconvenient it is for a person to do things with a pair of eyes.
Let's talk about satellites. Satellites have made great contributions: they can forecast the weather and carry out global positioning ... but if these satellites "run out of life", they will become space junk. Space junk will run amok in space, just like drivers who don't obey traffic rules on the road-stop others from driving. The rampage of these space junk will destroy the orbit of other spacecraft, cause these spacecraft to get out of orbit, and make the spacecraft carefully developed by scientists disappear without a trace. Although there are also space instruments to clean up space junk, after all, the cost is high and only one space junk can be eliminated.
High-tech has brought convenience to our life, but we can't ignore its shortcomings. I hope that in the 2 1 century, high-tech undertakings can consider our lives in many ways. Here, I wish the high-tech industry can come to by going up one flight of stairs!
Today, our class held a special debate. The content of the debate is: "Opening books is beneficial, but not necessarily beneficial".
The pros and cons sat on one side, and the host announced: "The debate officially begins!" The heated debate kicked off. The pros and cons entered a fierce war of words.
The first round, free speech. First of all, say yes first. Xiao Liwei took the lead: "Students, our view is that opening books is beneficial. Shakespeare once said, "Books are the nourishment of human beings." People who read more books are equivalent to rich nutrition. As we all know, nutrition is used to nourish the body, which means reading more books to enrich the knowledge of the mind. Not to be outdone, our opponent, talented woman Liang Juan, immediately took over and stated our point of view: "Positive students, we don't think it is necessarily beneficial to open books. Shakespeare also said,' books are still medicine, and good books can cure fools.' ? We think that since it is medicine, it can be divided into poison and good medicine. No matter how good the medicine is, it also has some side effects of poisonous weeds, which are three-point poison! If it's poison, it won't kill you directly. Unhealthy books are like poison. Reading those unhealthy books will not only fail to learn knowledge, but also lead to illegal crimes and ruin your life. Founder Xiao Liwei immediately retorted: "As long as you read more books, you can know what is good and what is bad." Xiao Liwei's words were immediately denied by us: "If you read bad books, you will be corrupted by them. The more books you read, the deeper the poisoning." Xiao Liwei, who has always been eloquent, immediately retorted: "I have seen too many, good and bad contrasts. Naturally, I can tell whether it is good or bad. " I retorted, "What if I can't get out of bad books?" Although I usually don't talk much, my opinion is a fatal blow to my classmates in Zheng Fang, while Zheng Fang is silent. After a long time, Xiao Liwei, the leader of the square, said, "Just read more books." At this point, his glib tongue seems to have no room for display, and his statement is not convincing. I further explained: "I'm so addicted that I may not be able to get out." The students were angry and angry, and the atmosphere was very warm. Teacher Yang declared the first round of debate over. The positive side fought alone, and our opponents refuted the positive side with sufficient reasons.
Second round, roll call. Teacher Yang selected two debaters for the debate. In the third round of concluding statements, the positive views are always untenable and gradually retreat.
The debate finally ended and our opponent won the final victory. Finally, Teacher Yang summarized today's debate. She said: "success is also a hero, and failure is also a hero, because we have a good opportunity to learn and exercise." Yes, through this debate, each of us has gained different degrees, and maybe the future debater was born here. (Instructor Yang Yinxian)
Wonderful debate
This morning, our class held a debate with the theme "Is it beneficial to open books?" . Positive view: open book is beneficial, negative view: open book is not necessarily beneficial. I am honored to be chosen as the opposing debater.
At the beginning of the debate, we appeared one by one. As soon as the host xu teacher opened the chatterbox, he directly cut into the theme: "The first level-the statements of both sides." Founder Zhang Waiqi spoke first: "Books are still medicine, and good reading can cure fools!" "After saying that, we argued-Guan Ruotong stood up:" No, reading is not necessarily good. "We each have our own merits, and the more we fight, the more we spit. The most wonderful thing is Wang's sentence, our second argument: "Books are medicine, but medicine should be symptomatic, otherwise it is poison, which will not only cure the disease, but will be counterproductive and will cure the dead." Therefore, books are like medicine, so you can't read them indiscriminately. Those unhealthy books will only harm you, and reading them will not help you, let alone be stupid. " Just after this paragraph was finished, thunderous applause broke out from the audience, and I was also happy for Wang: great, great!
The first level is over. Although the other side is not to be outdone, I firmly believe that we will beat them. Next, there is the second level of free debate.
The other party gave us a duel first, but we didn't panic, but calmly answered each other's questions. The other side kept asking questions, but they were all answered by our debater. It's our turn First, we hit them back with a heavy punch, and then, in pursuit of victory, we killed each other by surprise. The other party suddenly lost its foothold, was speechless, and suddenly quieted down. Look at them one by one in a hurry, nervously looking at the prepared manuscript and discussing countermeasures in a low voice. My heart jumped there like a rabbit. Because, I think we will win.
In the following debate, the other party's answer was illogical and the question lost its edge. In my eyes, it's really a bit wrong. Ask a sharp question occasionally, and everyone will be shocked by Dr. Wang's profound knowledge.
Time is almost over. With the voice of the host xu teacher, the second level is over. At this time, the victory is close to clear, and my heart is full of joy. ?
The last level-summary. Another debater, No.4, said, "We ... um ... want to ..." I don't know if the other side is nervous or has lost confidence in themselves. He seems to have no fighting spirit and stutters.
I stood up, my heart pounding like a deer. I took a deep breath and made a final summary fluently. "The British writer Fielding said,' Bad books are like bad friends, which may kill you.' Therefore, it is wrong to understand' open book is beneficial' unilaterally and think that all books can be read, and there is no need to choose or ask about the content, and just think that reading is beneficial. We should learn to choose good books that are valuable, healthy and suitable for us to read. In a word, we don't think it is necessarily beneficial to open books. "
As soon as my voice fell, the audience burst into applause. The five judges voted for us without hesitation and said, "Both sides have their own advantages, but the other side should be fully prepared!" "
Haha, the debate ended wonderfully, and we won by a wide margin! I benefited a lot from the debate. ?
Debate material
People often say: "It is beneficial to open books and read books." However, after careful consideration, this statement is not entirely correct. If we are interested in every book, it may not be good to open it.
Nowadays, students may all like to read martial arts and romance novels, books and periodicals, and sometimes forget to eat or sleep. Once they get lost in reading, they will be possessed. Then they concentrate on books in class and have no intention to study, and their grades will plummet. Others are attracted by some plots in the book, imitate the characters in the book, and sometimes take the road of crime. Isn't reading killing yourself? This is only the first layer of "opening books is beneficial": opening books is beneficial. And the second floor.
The second is that we should have a choice when studying. Don't read unhealthy books that don't help us much. When reading, you should read some books that are beneficial to your physical and mental health and helpful to your study and life. Such a book is a good book. Only by reading well will you not ruin yourself. Some people compare books to friends. If you value books, you will make good friends and make progress. If you don't read good books, of course, you will make friends with people who don't make good friends, and then you will regress. Because near Zhu Zhechi, near Mexico is black! Therefore, only reading will be beneficial to you. Therefore, in my opinion, opening books may not be beneficial. I sincerely hope that every student can read books selectively. Don't lead yourself astray and ruin your life just because you read a wrong book.
It is beneficial to open a book. Song Taizong and Zhao Guangyi have said this for more than 1000 years. For thousands of years, it has been accepted by countless people and passed down from mouth to mouth as a wise saying. Parents often teach or urge their children and elders to "study hard", thinking that as long as they study, they will gain knowledge and benefit a lot. Therefore, people often say: "There are thousands of millet in the book", "There is a golden house in the book" and "There is Yan Ruyu in the book". ?
In fact, whether reading is beneficial depends on the quality of reading. That book is a good book, and it is beneficial to open it; And if this book is not a good book but a bad one, it is not only useless but also harmful to open it. In recent years, our books and periodicals market has produced many good books, but also many bad books. Go to bookstores, book stands and book markets, and you will find some bad books everywhere. What flatterers, what harms others, what face learning, and so on, this kind of book that teaches people to learn bad, only poisons and corrodes young readers, without any benefit. As for those books that promote all kinds of negative and decadent ideas, cynicism and philosophy of life, and books that show a yellow and decadent lifestyle, it is even more harmful to open books.
Most people who talk about the benefits of opening books are well-meaning. When they say that it is beneficial to open books, they mean to read good books. However, the world is very complicated now, and some people really sell bad books to the world as good books for some purpose, especially teenagers. They also say that opening books is beneficial, but it is really harmful to readers.
Nowadays, most teenagers are highly motivated and curious, and love reading, but they often lack discrimination. In my opinion, our teachers have the responsibility to remind them to read more good books, at least harmless books, and never read bad books. Opening a book may not be beneficial!
Party A:
Students, our view remains the same, that is, "opening books is beneficial." Everyone is familiar with the famous saying of Du Fu, a poet in the Tang Dynasty: "Reading breaks thousands of books, and writing is like a god." Books are the crystallization of human wisdom, the summary of human historical experience and the reflection of social life. Reading can deeply understand the meaning of life, understand the vicissitudes of the world, benefit the people all over the world, and enter the hall of wisdom. Since ancient times, people who want to become talents and scholars who want to help the world must study. Only by reading a lot of books can you become a man. How can Party B say "reading is useless"?
Party A and Party B:
The ancients said, "Eating without meat is better than living without bamboo." Bamboo is also an elegant person. In other words, we can eat no meat for one day and study for one day. Books are the nourishment of human spirit, which can make us strong and noble. Pay attention to eye hygiene and rest for half an hour. At the same time, as long as we pay attention to reading books in regular bookstores, we won't see books with unhealthy thoughts.
Party A and Party C:
I want the facts to speak for themselves. At all times and in all countries, which effective person has not opened his book thousands of times? It is because of reading that they became famous and made great achievements. Confucius read thousands of books and edited poetry books. Sima Qian read thousands of books and wrote historical records. Li Bai read thousands of books and wrote hundreds of poems about fighting wine; Lu Xun and Guo Moruo read thousands of books and became masters of modern literature in China ... Gorky put it well: "Books are the ladder of human progress." It has become an ironclad fact that reading more books increases knowledge and makes people smart. The British philosopher Bacon famously said, "History lessons make people wise, poetry makes them wise, mathematics makes them careful, natural history makes them profound, and ethics makes them solemn." Many of these meanings can be summed up in one sentence: opening books is beneficial. If we don't study, where can we get knowledge? What's more, there are countless famous sayings about the benefits of reading. Let's talk about it Can't the experience summed up by so many celebrities and great men fully explain that "opening books is beneficial"?
Party A Party D:
I think it is beneficial to open books. Gorky said: "Books are the ladder of human progress." Reading more books will increase your knowledge. Isn't Edison an example? He read a lot of books, got inspiration from them and did a lot of practice before he invented the electric light.
Bacon, a world famous person, said: "History lessons make people wise, poetry makes them wise, mathematics makes them careful, natural history makes them profound, and the study of ethics makes them solemn." Many of these meanings can be summed up in one sentence: opening books is beneficial. If we don't read more books, how can we get so much knowledge? Without knowledge, how can you tell people who is right and who is wrong?
Books are the summary of historical experience and the crystallization of social culture. Reading can thoroughly understand the truth of life; Reading can help you understand the vicissitudes of the world; Reading can benefit people all over the world. If you don't read more books, where can you get rich words to write compositions?
Marx learned a lot from opening books. When he wrote Das Kapital, he read more than 1000 books by himself and went to the British Museum to read three books. If Marx had never read a book, he might not have written Das Kapital.
Ye Wen, a sophomore in Hangzhou No.4 Middle School, likes reading books since he was a child. He is not only knowledgeable, but also good at arts and sciences. He has published more than 30 articles in many newspapers and won five thesis writing awards. Can a student of 17 have such a grade, which is not enough to show that "opening books is beneficial"? If a man wants to become a talent, a scholar must study to help the world.
As for the other party's "pornographic books and periodicals", I can give you an answer: we read too many books, and when we see books that are unhealthy for our body and mind, we can recognize them as soon as we read them, and we will not read them or buy them again.
Party a e:
In this information-based world, reading is one of the only ways for us to acquire knowledge. Reading more books can broaden our knowledge and enrich our literary accomplishment, which is of great help to our future speaking and writing.
Our knowledge is like a reservoir. A lot of reading enables our reservoir to store a lot of knowledge, and while we supplement our knowledge, our knowledge is constantly leaking out. At this time, if we stop reading or read less, the water in the reservoir will soon run out. Only by constantly enriching extracurricular reading can we enrich our knowledge without losing a lot. A lot of knowledge can provide enough material for your composition, otherwise you will only write some meaningless repetitive words if you hold it for a long time.
Is it beneficial to open books?
"Rinrin Bell-"At the beginning of class, the teacher came into the classroom and said to us, "Now, let's start a useful debate about opening books. The positive is beneficial, and the negative is not necessarily beneficial. Now let the students talk about whether they are positive or negative and give reasons. " At the same time, LinYu stood up and said, "I'm in favor of opening the book, and my principle is …" This classmate finished, and another classmate stood up and said, "I'm against it, and my reason is …" And so on, all the students talked endlessly, expressing their reasons, all blushing, and all the students present listened carefully. We should stop those who read useless books and tell them to stop reading those useless books. Useful books are our friends, but useless books are our enemies. "Then, several students stood up and spoke their reasons. ...
Then, a classmate stood up and said, "Now let me sum up the reasons of the classmates above. Whether the students are for or against the party, their reasons are all right ... "After this classmate finished speaking, several other students stood up and spoke their own conclusions respectively.
The Rinrin bell rang, the debate was over, and the students walked out of the classroom one by one. ?
Beautiful campus life, with many colorful activities. What I remember most is the interesting and wonderful debate.
I still clearly remember the debate contest: "Next, we will have a debate contest with the topic" How about inviting classmates to dinner on your birthday "". Students are divided into pros and cons, and each side chooses four debaters and a small host. Then the small host came on stage and said, "Please prepare the main debater and take your seat." At the same time, the curtain of the debate opened.
First of all, the first debater in the square said, "We don't think it's good to invite classmates to dinner on our birthdays!" "The first debater said," We think it's good! "When the opposing side made its position clear, then the second debater of both sides held a second round of debate, only to see the second debater of the opposing side stand up calmly and say," Our reason is extravagance and waste; Bring psychological pressure to students with poor family economy; You invited me, and I didn't invite you, which may lead to contradictions; My birthday is my mother's most painful day. We invite our classmates to dinner, and we have to make my mother spend money. Do we want our parents to suffer on this day every year? " "Invite students to dinner, students can learn from each other and exchange knowledge. "The second dissenter did not show weakness, and retorted," As for the problem of spending money, we can do what we can and fry a few side dishes ourselves. "... and then the third and fourth games came to an end.
At this time, the small host came to the stage and announced: "The second free debate begins."
At first, there was only a whisper in the classroom, and the small audience were anxious to stretch their faces tightly, holding blue fists in their hands and staring at every move on the stage. At this time, the first debater in the square said, "What should I do if something happens on the way to my classmate's birthday home?" This question made the opposing side speechless, and at that time the classroom was silent. After a while, the Little Square audience cheered happily! And what about some small audiences? I had to sit there with a sad face. Because the little host announced a definite victory.
The teacher smiled and walked to the podium table early: "It does have advantages and disadvantages to invite students to dinner on their birthdays. We should treat it differently in real life to make birthdays meaningful. In today's debate, the students boldly participated and expressed accurately. I am very happy and hope that the students' oral communication ability can be further improved in such activities in the future. " At this time, there was fierce applause on the classroom road.
The class began, and we walked into the classroom happily. Because there will be a reading debate in this class today.
The debate began. First of all, the teacher announced the debate request: "Now I declare the reading debate of Class 52 started! The front is composed of Chen Moruo and Si Xinyi, and the back is composed of Xu Ruonan and Zhang. The requirement is that the debaters on both sides should express their opinions around their own views, and the debaters on both sides should respect each other, convince others by reasoning, and not be arrogant and unreasonable. The positive view holds that opening books is beneficial, while the negative view holds that opening books is not necessarily beneficial. Ok, now the debaters on both sides begin to debate. "
Chen Moruo first expressed his opinion: "We believe that opening books is beneficial. Think about it, you can get new knowledge and gain new gains from books every time. And since ancient times, which celebrity has not read many books? "
Hearing this, Xu Ruonan immediately retorted: "We don't think it is necessarily beneficial to open books. What the other party just said is not comprehensive. Because some unhealthy books sold on the bookstall now will be bought by some teenagers, poisoning their hearts, making them embark on the road of committing crimes and breaking the law, and letting them get deeper and deeper in the quagmire. "
Si Xinyi's "Crash into a Building" expresses her opinion: "The other party is right, but we are talking about opening a healthy volume, reading good books, and being accompanied by good books, just like walking with intimate friends, which will benefit us immensely."
As one of the representatives of the opposing party, I immediately retorted after listening to his speech: "What the other party just said is not unreasonable, but some teenagers' own resistance is really poor. Moreover, the ancients said that' opening books is beneficial'. At that time, people read classics of various sects, so the ancients at that time would say' opening books is beneficial'. "
The tense atmosphere was broken, and the two sides argued with each other. ...
At last the teacher dismissed the class. She said, "Now the reading debate in Class 52 is over. I summed it up, that is, we must remember that opening books is beneficial and take its essence. On this basis, we should study hard, broaden our horizons, use our brains, improve our moral sentiment and appreciation ability, and learn nutrition from books for life. "
As soon as the voice fell, the whole class immediately burst into warm applause. The reading debate in our class ended with warm applause.
It's almost time for the landlord to have a good look. There should be something you want, please adopt it! ! !