The full score of this Chinese test is 150, the test time is 150 minutes, the objective questions are 36 points, and each question is 3 points; The subjective question is 1 14. The average score of the examination is 90.97 for science, with a passing rate of 59.9%, and 90.87 for liberal arts, with a passing rate of 56.77%. The test paper is moderately difficult and has a certain degree of discrimination, which basically achieves the purpose of testing students' knowledge and ability. Now the exam is summarized as follows.
First, the basic knowledge part
The correct rate of pronunciation, sick sentences and sentence cohesion questions is high, but the correct rate of font and idiom questions is poor. Students are unfamiliar with "as few as the morning star" and can't tell the meaning of "morning" and "Chen". And the words in Sigh are easily confused with sadness. The idiom "stand out from the crowd" is familiar to students, but its scope of use is not clear, which leads to misuse.
Second, the reading part.
1 short reading
In this short reading, the materials and test questions in the second volume of the country in 2008 were selected, so the setting of test sites was very accurate and unambiguous, and the correct answer rate was very high. But the ninth sub-item inference problem is generally wrong. Students can't tell the meaning of some key words. The "root cause" is wrong, but it should be one of the "direct causes". Inference questions should be combined with the original text and carried out reasonably.
2 reading
The selected material is Ji Xianlin's Fog, and the examination points are the function of detail description, the main points of generalization, the understanding of sentence connotation and the analysis of writing ideas. The exam is difficult, and the ability to understand, summarize and analyze is the key.
The main problems of students' answering questions are that they are not careful in examining questions, wrong in answering angles, incomplete in summarizing key points, nonstandard in answering questions, and many points are lost. Moreover, there are fewer types of writing ideas, and some students don't know how to start, which leads to irrelevant answers.
3 classical Chinese reading and poetry appreciation
The correct rate of the last multiple-choice question in classical Chinese is less than 10%. The main reason is that students can't combine the meaning of "ear" with specific context, and at the same time lack knowledge of ancient artifacts, thus translating "bell ear" into "scratching ear", which leads to mistakes in answering questions. Translation part: the sentence 1 scored higher, while sentences 2 and 3 lost more points. Words such as "father", "well-educated" and "no talent" have certain cultural background, and many students look for meaning from literature and translate it literally, which leads to losing points.
The content of poetry appreciation questions is well summarized; However, the analysis questions of appreciation techniques are generally not scored. Students don't understand the combination of reality and reality, and at the same time they don't understand the thinking and skills of answering questions, which leads to irrelevant answers, vague and general answers and serious loss of points.
Trilingual expression part
Question 20 examines the ability to identify inappropriate words, focusing on the use of modest words and the use of words in applied style. The difficulty is moderate, and the students can answer it easily.
2 1 recombination sentence involves the transformation of sentence patterns. The basic format of rhetorical questions is unclear, and many students have become ill sentences or rhetorical questions after reorganization.
Four compositions
It is an argumentative paper, entitled "Appreciation". The highest score is 46, the lowest score is 20 and the average score is 38-39. The main mistakes are: mistakes in examining questions, deviation from materials, tolerance and optimism, etc. Improper selection of materials, irrationality, causal imposition, intellectual error, inconsistency between the starting point and the center of materials, etc. The article lacks a sense of hierarchy, materials piled up, repeated content, top-heavy, and the structure does not reflect clear ideas. The depth of thought is not enough, it stays on the surface, the analysis is not thorough, and it is superficial.
(a) Interpretation and evaluation of the topic
Read the following text and write as required. (60 points)
An old carpenter is preparing to retire. He told his boss that he would leave the construction industry and go home to enjoy family happiness with his wife and children.
The boss was reluctant to leave the excellent carpenter and asked him if he could help build another house. The old carpenter agreed. But everyone can see later that his heart is no longer working. He uses soft materials and does rough work. After the house was built, the boss gave him the key to the gate.
"This is your house," he said. "My gift to you."
The old carpenter was stunned. What a pity! If he had known that he had built his own house before, he wouldn't have been so careless.
Please write an article on the topic of "Building a house for yourself" according to the above story and the phenomenon reflected. You can tell stories, express your feelings and express your opinions.
Note (1) Angle is optional, and the thinking is self-determined. (2) Except for poetry, the style is not limited. ③ No less than 800 words. (4) Do not copy.
The "house" in the topic of "building a house for yourself" has multiple meanings, not only material, but also intangible and spiritual, that is, its metaphorical meaning, such as career, life, life, ideal, future and so on. Therefore, it is not appropriate to stay on the surface of the phenomenon when conceiving, but to have a certain ideological depth in narration, description and discussion. We can conceive from the following angles: in the process of building our own spiritual home, we should strive for perfection; Sticking to morality is a person's bottom line; From the perspective of starting from the beginning to the end, the process of building a house can not only reflect a person's quality, but also a spiritual realm ... In fact, life is like building a house. If we covet speed and small profits, use soft materials and make rough works, then our life will surely become a dangerous house. When we casually "build" our own life, we refuse to strive for perfection in everything, and we can't do our best and make positive progress at critical moments. When we were shocked by our situation, we were already immersed in this "house" we built. Everyone's life is the only creation in his life, which cannot be erased and reconstructed. Need to be consistent from beginning to end.
Generally speaking, this essay topic has the following characteristics. (1) It is easy to understand, and there are no obstacles in the exam. It not only has a wide range of applicability, so that candidates have something to say, but also requires candidates not only to pay attention to personal life, but also to deep-seated social problems; (2) The difficulty is moderate, and everyone has something to write. The topic is both intellectual and emotional, reasonable and long. When writing, we should not only pay attention to emotional lyricism and express true feelings, but also pay attention to life and rational thinking about life, and expound our own ideological understanding, so as to show the rational thinking level of senior high school students. (3) This topic also better embodies the concept of the new curriculum, showing the characteristics of openness and restriction, which can not only prevent guessing, betting and making, but also enable candidates of different levels to exert their different writing levels.
(2) Overall evaluation
Judging from the marking situation, it is generally satisfactory. First of all, most students' compositions can be deducted from the topic, and there are not many digressions, and there are almost no digressions. But there are also many mediocre works, and most of the students' compositions are similar in theme and lack creativity. This shows that our senior two students' overall writing level is not high, and they need to strengthen training at ordinary times. Writing three paragraphs parallel to the end is very rampant. The first three paragraphs are often written like this: build a house for yourself, based on strength (sincerity, kindness, persistence and self-confidence); Build a house for yourself, with a sense of responsibility (perseverance, pursuit of ideals, good beginning and good end) as the framework; Build a house for yourself with faith as the roof.