I obviously belong to the former. So in the past five years, I am most worried about losing my interest in playing games and losing my mood as an ordinary player. John romero seems to belong to the former, but the failure of broadsword seems to imply that this awesome man finally only saved his mood as an ordinary player, or more impolitely, what he thought as an ordinary player. The most unavoidable problems in cultural and creative industries, or in popular terms, commercial arts, are the subjective judgment of creators and the actual needs of the market. Poetry is like this. Lao Luo said that poets can't live in this era; The same is true of movies. Art films often fail at the box office. Only the normal mind of real ordinary players can see clearly what the target population in this market needs. Therefore, if people like me love real life, or are dragged down by trivial things in life, the biggest worry is to lose their enthusiasm for games. After all, games are just a part of life for me. John carmack looks like the latter, but unfortunately, his "game" is just his favorite game program. Perhaps since he began to appreciate the magic of computer technology, since he had no time to play more games, he was no longer a real gamer. Therefore, ID will never be a blizzard, although Carmack's technology is very powerful. This is also my concern. Recalling why I turned my direction from games to 3D CG five years ago, it may be that kind of technical worship. In fact, since the AppleII era, all the difficulties in game design are in graphics processing, so ID can last for so long, but again, technology is not everything, especially in the field of games.
By the way, the real latter, that is, those who really live in games, is popular now: English is a person who has absolutely no life! , Chinese is called "otaku".
Business rationality, tough technical style and belief.
As I told Shuge, I have studied and worked hard for two years on business thinking mode and problem-solving methods. Objectively speaking, we do realize the benefits of these circuitous wrists, but the key is, are we really "cool" inside?
Business rationality is to maximize interests, strive for money and fail to live up to expectations. People who believe in business rationality believe that no one can have a hard time with money, and by extension, everyone in this world is like this. But if you think so, do you ignore the emotional side of people and the fact that there is still faith in this world? Perhaps this is an age of indifference to faith, but no one can guarantee that no one else will keep his word. I'm still saying that any problem that can be solved with money in this world is not a problem.
People who believe that money can exchange everything will have such a discussion: make money with health before 40 years old, and buy health with money after 40 years old. In fact, selling health can make money. In fact, selling dignity can sometimes make money. But money worship ignores that money can't buy health; Money can't buy dignity. I often quote a sentence from Zhou Xingxing's Kung Fu: "Once a rabbit, always a rabbit!"
ID's tough technical style is like a martial arts novel, full of joy, kindness and hate.
"University is for those who have no ability but want to live a better life than others"-Zheng.
Zheng Yuanjie, one of the top 25 paid writers in China in 2007, can stand up straight now and say this sentence.
The pressure of tradition is enormous. Even Bill Gates can't refine it. In his speech at the graduation ceremony of Harvard University this year, he said, "I have been waiting for 30 years, and now I can finally say,' Dad, I always told you that I would come back and get my degree!'" " "。
So, what is the most difficult thing for a person to let go of is fame-or vanity?
1997, Ma Yun once said, "I firmly believe in my choice, and I will kneel here for at least ten years." In fact, ordinary people simply can't understand what an ambitious person means by "kneeling down".
However, these are not important, fame or vanity, they succeeded.
Only a madman can succeed in this world. Sometimes when I think back to those years when computer technology developed rapidly in the world, I spent all my time reading. In fact, AppleII vs CEC-I (Chinese Learning Machine), in the early 1990s, my understanding of computers was not much different from that of Carmack, but I was a good student and could not transcend my historical limitations, that's all.
There is no time.
2007- 12-05