When is it correct to modify an incorrect sentence to say "two faces to one face"? Generally speaking, "two faces to one face" is wrong, but I did a question today and it turned out to be correct. When the word "one side" you mentioned contains both positive and negative meanings, this is not a linguistic problem but correct. For example, like "what is the result", the result itself includes good results and bad results, which has two sides. And words like "success" are only one-sided. In Question 14 of the 2011 National New Curriculum Standard Paper, there is a special case of a two-sided question. 14. Among the following sentences, the one that is not faulty is (3 points) A. The quality of talent training is an important factor in measuring the success of a university. Vigorously improving the level of talent training is a strategic issue in the reform and development of higher education. B． In order to better improve service quality, we must adhere to the people-oriented approach and create a harmonious waiting environment and happy humanized services for passengers to the greatest extent. C. This new cold medicine has been clinically tested on more than 400 cases in hospitals in Beijing, Shanghai, Nanjing, Hangzhou, Kaifeng and other places, and 80% reported that it is indeed effective. D. As the school anniversary is approaching, the school requires all teachers and students to pay attention to etiquette and be hospitable to guests, so as to make alumni who return to their alma mater from all over the country to participate in the celebrations feel at home. Answer: A Analysis: B The collocation of the parallel words is inappropriate, it should be "providing happy humanized services"; C The preposition is wrong, "through" is changed to "pass"; The subject and predicate are not collocated properly, "80%" is added after "patients" "; D. The structure is confusing and should be changed to "To bring the alumni who come back to their alma mater from all over the country to participate in the celebrations to feel at home" or "to make the alumni who come back to their alma mater from all over the country to participate in the celebrations to feel at home." 2. Which of the following sentences has no grammatical errors in expression is () (1993) A. This cultural station has become a place to educate and help underachieving youth, rescue and cultivate delinquent youth, and has been commended by superior leaders many times. B. Whether the electronics industry can develop rapidly and widely penetrate into all walks of life, the key lies in accelerating training and cultivating a group of specialized technical talents. C. Do you know how much labor of bees is included in each kilogram of honey? According to statistics from scientists, bees collect approximately 500,000 pollen for every pound of honey produced. Mr. D. talked eloquently. Although his voice, smile and appearance had not changed much, the wrinkles at the corners of his eyes seemed to imply the hardship and unhappiness of these years. (The correct answer is D. The sentence "cultivating delinquent youth" in sentence A is inappropriate. The sentence "and cultivate" should be deleted. There is no correspondence between the two sentences before and after it. There is affirmation and negation in front of it. There is only affirmation after B. Delete the "no" in front or change "to". In the sentence "whether", "500,000 flowers" cannot modify "pollen"; C, "flower" should be added after "500,000 flowers"). 5. Among the following sentences, the one with no grammatical errors and clear meaning is () (1996) A. Units with advantages in professional research and experiments have sent lecturers, accepted visiting scholars, organized training classes and other collaborations. The unit’s obligation to provide assistance. B. Whether we can cultivate new people with the "four qualities" is a major matter related to the future and destiny of our party and country, and it is also the fundamental task of the education front. C. Everyone is generally very angry that the forest rangers exposed the problem of wood smuggling taken by the Forestry Bureau. D. Relevant departments have promptly criticized, educated and severely dealt with the very few incidents of disrespecting sanitation workers' labor, making unreasonable troubles, and even beating and insulting sanitation workers. (The correct answer is A. The long sentence A has many additional components. Use abbreviation. The main part of the sentence is "...unit, has...obligation", and there is no grammatical problem. Look at the additional components again, and the meaning of the sentence is clear. Item B The word "can" refers to both "can" and "can't", but the text below only talks about one side, which is out of consideration. The person who "generally feels very angry" in item C should be "the one who took the lead in smuggling wood from the Forestry Bureau." problem", while the original sentence is "the ranger exposed the problem", obviously the object of "angry" is wrong. This is due to the unclear expression of the attributive of "problem" in the sentence. If you add "the ranger exposed" after The word "的" makes the meaning clear. The object of "criticism, education and serious treatment" in item D is "event", and the predicate and object cannot be matched one by one. For example, "education event" will not make sense. ...A very small number of people are not wrong if they have been criticized, educated and dealt with seriously.) 6. The following sentence is not wrong in language: () (1997) A. In order to comprehensively promote the use of rapeseed cake or cottonseed cake to feed pigs, speed up the To develop the pig breeding industry, this county held three technical training courses for breeders. B. When they encountered difficulties, they did not feel depressed. Instead, they gained strength from everyone's trust and care and established the confidence to overcome difficulties. . C. The amount of savings absorbed by savings plays an important role in the growth of national liquidity, so mobilizing urban and rural residents to participate in savings is an important means of accumulating funds. D. He is usually taciturn, but as long as he talks at academic conferences. When he talks about his beloved major, he becomes more lively and talkative. (The correct answer is C. A "promote" lacks an object, it should be "promote... pig feeding technology". B "not depressed" and "not depressed". "Establishing the confidence to overcome difficulties" should be a progressive relationship. Obviously, the mistake is caused by using the wrong conjunction "but". "But" can be replaced by "and" and "D" is particularly active. "I'm more talkative" is an error caused by the use of adverbials and complements expressing degree. You can delete one of "extra" and "many".
) 18. (05 National Volume I) Among the following sentences, the one with no grammatical errors is A. Since the birth of the Beijing University Student Film Festival in 1993, more than 1 million people have participated in watching films. B． The Municipal Education Commission requires that daily necessities and bedding in each school's student apartments must be purchased by students independently and must not be uniformly provided. C． Whether we can implement the Scientific Outlook on Development is undoubtedly of great significance to building a harmonious society and promoting sustainable economic development. D. This year's tight electricity supply and demand situation will be eased, and power cuts will be reduced accordingly, but overall it is still tight. Answer D. Although option D seems a bit wordy in terms of expression, compared with other options, there is no principled error. Item A lies in the contradiction between "accumulated" and "exceeded" and should be changed to "accumulated 1 million people" or "has exceeded 1 million people." The error in item B lies in the improper juxtaposition of concepts. "Daily necessities" should include "bedding". The error in item C lies in improper response. The two-sided expression of "can" does not match the following "of great significance". 19. Among the following sentences, the one with no grammatical errors is (2006 National Volume 1) A. The Qinghai-Tibet Railway runs through Qinghai and Tibet provinces and across the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. It is a strategically important railway line connecting Tibet with the mainland. B． This time-honored food factory is not large in scale, but it is very particular about the selection of ingredients to processing and production. The food it produces has always been highly trusted by new and old customers. C． The spokesperson of the National Tourism Administration denied the question of whether Tiananmen Square and other seven red tourist attractions charge tickets at a press conference. D. The central government will gradually expand the provision of free textbooks to students from poor families in compulsory education year by year, and local governments will also set up special funds for student aid. Analysis A. Item B should be changed to "highly relied on by new and old customers". Item C "denies" what is unclear - "whether to charge tickets or not." Item D lacks the central word, so add “scope” after “free textbooks”. 5． Two aspects do not correspond to one aspect (2004) (1) The quality of the investment environment, the quality of services, and the quality of government officials are all important guarantees for the healthy development of the regional economy. (National Volume C, Question 6, Item A) The first three places talk about two aspects of "good and bad", "pros and cons" and "high and low", while the latter only talks about one aspect, "healthy development". The front and back do not correspond, and should be included in "health" Add "can" in front. (2) The quality of the language of literary and artistic works does not lie in the fact that it uses a lot of gorgeous words or the terminology of a certain industry, but in that the words are used in the right place. (Fujian Paper, Question 5, Item C) The former talks about the two aspects of "good and bad", and the latter only talks about "use" and "use in the right place", which does not correspond to each other. You can change the following to "whether it is used" and "whether it is used in the right place". The syllabus for correcting defective sentences in Chinese language for the College Entrance Examination clearly stipulates six language defects: improper word order, improper collocation, incomplete and redundant components, chaotic structure, illogicality, and unclear meaning. Among the types of improperly collocated sentences, one type is "two-faced words". Generally speaking, the two-faced words like "can" and "whether" that appear in front must also be followed by corresponding two-faced words. , but there is a special case that there is a double-sided word in front, but there is no corresponding double-sided word in the back. For example 1: The key to whether students' personal quality can be steadily improved and they can adapt to the rapidly developing social environment in a timely manner lies in the intensity of education reform in our education department. Explanation: "Can" in the sentence is a double-sided word, and it should be followed by a matching double-sided word. The word "strength" has two meanings, namely "strong force" and "low force", and whether the personal quality can This sentence is correct that steady improvement is subject to the constraints of the intensity of education. For example 2: Quality is the life of the project, and carefulness is the guarantee of quality engineering. Whether we are serious and responsible for the construction of the project is directly related to the quality of the project. We must think deeply and be cautious. Analysis: "Whether" in the sentence should correspond to "quality" in the following sentence. "Whether" is a double-sided word, and "quality" is one word, but "quality" has two connotations, namely "high quality" and " Low quality", this sentence is also correct. With these two special cases, I thought that when reviewing and preparing for exams, we should not "take it for granted". Sometimes our "mindset" will make us make wrong choices. Therefore, when facing any problem, we must be careful, think deeply and carefully. for. Challenge: Can you correctly determine which of the following sentences are correct and which are incorrect? 1． The quality of students has an important impact on their adaptability to society after leaving school. Therefore, comprehensively improving students' quality is the foundation of education. The reason why students make misjudgments may be that they have a unclear understanding of the "influence" of implicit "double-sided" words. "Influence" is a "two-sided" word, containing both positive and negative meanings. Like (5), it is a speechless sentence. 2. The high and low aspirations of students play an important role in their success. Therefore, motivating students to establish their aspirations scientifically is an indispensable part of education. Here, "high and low" talks about "two sides", and "function" seems to only talk about "one side", but in fact it talks about "two sides", because "function" is an implicit "two-sided" word, which can be positive It can be positive or negative. The semantic expression is not confusing and is grammatical and logical. 3. The bank's verification of the loan repayment ability of the customer who applies to purchase a car is an important part of the decision to grant a loan. "Decision" should include two situations: one is to send, the other is not to send, so "whether" should be added after "decision" to ensure strict logic.
4． Whether we can cultivate new people with the "Four Haves" is a major matter related to the future and destiny of our party and country, and it is also the fundamental task of the education front. "Fundamental task" and "can't" are one and two sides, remove "can't" 5. Whether we can achieve sustainable development is a major issue related to the vital interests of future generations. We must never do anything to disgrace future generations. ("Being able" or "unable" to develop sustainably is "related to the vital interests of future generations." This sentence is not wrong.) The meaning of the third clause of Example 5 is very clear, "You cannot do things that would disgrace future generations." The implication is that "we must achieve sustainable development and consider the vital interests of future generations." There is nothing wrong with this sentence. 6. The amount of savings absorbed by savings plays an important role in the growth of national liquidity. Therefore, mobilizing urban and rural residents to participate in savings is an important means of accumulating funds. ("Important role" can include both positive and negative aspects, so it goes hand in hand with "high and low".) 7. The national players participating in the top ten World Cup matches know that winning or losing a goal is not only related to personal appearance, but also to the The honor of the motherland. (×) "Win or lose" and "face" are two sides, and "honor" is a glorious reputation, which is one side. 8. The key to whether our city can seize opportunities and develop rapidly in the strategic plan of developing the western region lies in accelerating the training of a group of talents. (×) "Can" and "accelerate training" are two sides and one side. Material 1: Saying "two-faced" words In a special test on identifying bad sentences, many students judged the following sentence as a bad sentence: (1) The quality of students has an important impact on their ability to adapt to society after leaving school. Therefore, comprehensive Improving students' quality is the foundation of education. The reason is that "level of quality" means "two sides", while "important influence" only means "one side", which is a lack of care and improper matching of meanings. In fact, this sentence is not a bad sentence. Students' misjudgment reflects that some students have a superficial understanding of this diseased sentence type, or they are rigidly rigid and unable to flexibly apply the knowledge they have learned. Among Chinese words, some words have only "one side" meaning: they can be positive, such as "high", "excellent", "is", "should", etc.; they can also be negative, such as "low", "bad" , "isn't", "shouldn't", etc. There are also some words that have both positive and negative meanings, such as "high or low", "good or bad", "whether", "should or shouldn't", etc. When we use these words to make sentences, if we match one-sided words with two-sided words, it will cause confusion in the expression of meaning, which is what we often call improper matching. For example: (2) Teachers must not ignore students' lively and inactive strengths. (3) Doing a good job in transforming poor students depends on whether the teacher truly understands the inner world of the students. (4) Whether the learning method is correct or not is one of the important factors in improving students' performance. These three sentences all suffer from improper collocation. Because the words "one side" and "two sides" are not collocated properly, the meanings before and after are illogical. In (2), "lively or not" talks about "two sides", and "strengths" only talks about "one side". In (3), "transformation work" talks about "one side", but "whether you understand" talks about "two sides". In (4), "whether it is correct or not" talks about "two sides", while "important factors" only talks about "one side". The faults in these sentences are not difficult to recognize and are generally unmistakable. In fact, there are some words that seem to be "one-sided" but are actually "two-sided". Let's call them "implicit double-sided words". For example: (5) The high and low aspirations of students play an important role in their success. Therefore, motivating students to scientifically establish their aspirations is an indispensable part of education. Here, "high and low" talks about "two sides", and "function" seems to only talk about "one side", but in fact it talks about "two sides", because "function" is an implicit "two-sided" word, which can be positive It can be positive or negative. The semantic expression is not confusing and is grammatical and logical. Looking at (1) again, why students misjudged, the reason may be that they do not clearly understand the "influence" of implicit "double-sided" words. "Influence" is a "two-sided" word, containing both positive and negative meanings. Like (5), it is a speechless sentence. When we use the words "one side" and "two sides", we must be consistent with each other. For example: (6) The correctness of the content is the primary criterion for measuring the quality of an article. (7) Strong women used to be "looked down upon", but in the era of reform and opening up, they were enthusiastically "favored" by people. Between this "looked down" and "favored", they realized the society's contempt and respect for women. . (8) The effectiveness of the measures taken will have an important impact on whether the education front can win the battle of "curriculum reform". This is an example of the correct use of "double-sided" words. We should also pay special attention to the use of some implicit "double-sided" words. Let’s briefly talk about the modifications of relatively incorrect sentences. You can use the "increase and subtraction" method, or remove the word "one side" from the word "two sides" and replace it with the word "one side", or add "one side" to the word "one side" and change it to the word "two sides". For example: (9) The key to whether the computer industry can develop rapidly and drive related industries is to accelerate the creation of a group of specialized talents. You can change "whether" to "one side", or you can add "whether" before "accelerate the creation" to change "one side" to "two sides". (9) It can be changed to "the key to rapid development of the computer industry and driving related industries is to accelerate the creation of a group of specialized talents." Or it may become "whether the computer industry can develop rapidly and drive related industries, the key lies in whether it can accelerate the creation of a group of specialized talents."
When teaching "two-faced" words, we must distinguish them from the partial meanings and complex words in ancient Chinese, such as: (10) Work and rest diligently day and night. "Qin" means one side, and "work and rest" means "two sides". This is allowed in ancient Chinese, because "work and rest" is a partial compound word, and "xi" is a foil, just to make up the syllables. Material 2: Analysis of incorrect sentences that do not match one or both sides. The analysis and modification of incorrect sentences test candidates’ ability to use the Chinese language accurately and standardly, and have become a required question in the college entrance examination in recent years. There are two main angles to examine faulty sentences in the college entrance examination, one is structure and the other is content. One of the linguistic disorders of improper collocation is "improper collocation of one side and two sides", because it is not only the structure but also the characteristics of the content that is considered, and sometimes it is difficult to distinguish. A simple analysis is now performed to help candidates identify such incorrect sentences easily and quickly. (1) Whether the electronics industry can develop rapidly and widely penetrate into all walks of life, the key lies in accelerating training and cultivating a group of specialized technical talents. (2) The bank's verification of the loan repayment ability of the customer who applies to purchase a car is an important part of the decision to grant a loan. In example (1), "whether it can develop rapidly and be widely penetrated" has two situations: "can" and "no". The determining factor is "whether it can accelerate training and create a group of specialized technical talents", which should also be "whether it can accelerate training and create a group of specialized technical talents." "Two aspects correspond to it. Obviously the two sides and one side in this sentence do not match. The word "want" should be removed and the word "can" should be removed, or the word "can" should be removed and the word "want" should be removed. In Example (2), the "decision" based on the ability to repay the loan should also include two situations, one is to pay, and the other is not to pay. Therefore, "whether" should be added after the "decision" to make the logic strict and take care of the situation. In the college entrance examination training, we often guide students to grasp the rules. In the sentence to be distinguished, whether there is a double-sided word like "can" or "whether" in the sentence to be distinguished, regardless of the previous sentence or the second sentence, we must pay attention to the fact that it often has one side and two sides. Mismatched language problems. But since it is "often" and some special circumstances cannot be ruled out, the care between one side and both sides is not absolute. (3) Whether we can cultivate new people with the "Four Haves" is a major matter related to the future and destiny of our party and country, and it is also the fundamental task of the education front. (4) Whether we can achieve sustainable development is a major issue related to the vital interests of future generations. We must never do anything to disgrace future generations. Example (3) is a faulty sentence, one side and two sides do not match, and Example (4) is speechless. There is no problem with the collocation of the first two clauses in these two sentences. "Can it or not" are two uncertain aspects, and "relating to the future and destiny" and "relating to vital interests" are also two uncertain aspects. If The previous sentence is "can cultivate" and "can do", then the "future and destiny" will be good, and it will be beneficial to the "vital interests of future generations", and vice versa. However, the third clause in example (3) does not match the first clause. Is it "the fundamental task of the education front to not cultivate new people with four talents"? The error is obvious. The meaning of the third clause of Example (4) is very clear. “We must not do anything that will disgrace future generations.” The implication is “We must achieve sustainable development and consider the vital interests of future generations.” There is nothing wrong with this sentence. Another example: (5) The key to a person's success in career lies in internal factors. (6) Judgment is a way of thinking that affirms or denies that something has a certain nature. (7) The re-examination will be held in a week, and whether he is admitted or not will determine his life. (8) Facts have repeatedly proven that the ability to innovate and the ability to innovate are the decisive factors in economic and technological competition in the world today. (9) The quality of photography and the taste of poetry are determined by a person’s thoughts and artistic accomplishments. (10) A recently released mobile phone market survey report shows that whether a broken mobile phone can be repaired conveniently and satisfactorily is an important factor in triggering mobile phone quality disputes. Among them, sentences (5), (6), (7), and (8) are correct, while sentences (9) and (10) are incorrect. In sentence (5), "whether achievements can be achieved" are two uncertain aspects, "can" or "cannot"; "the key lies in internal factors" is also uncertain. If internal factors play a role, achievements can be achieved, and vice versa. No. Therefore, this sentence is consistent in content. Sentence (6) defines "judgment". The definition points out two forms of judgment: positive judgment and negative judgment. Positive judgment is a way of thinking that affirms that something has a certain nature, and negative judgment is a way of thinking that denies that something has a certain nature. If we only rely on the corresponding requirements in structural form, it is easy to mistakenly think that we need to add the word "whether" before "have", which will make the meaning unclear and cause duplication. Sentence (7) "Admit or not" includes two aspects: "admit" and "not admit". How to decide her life is uncertain. If she is admitted, her future life will develop smoothly in a good direction. If she is not admitted, Admission will go through hardships and encounter difficulties. So the content is also consistent. Sentence (8) has the same meaning. The meaning of "ideological and artistic cultivation" in sentence (9) is certain. It means "to have ideological and artistic cultivation". It can only be combined with the meaning of "well taken" and "interestingly written" in the previous sentence, so this sentence needs to be When it comes to matching before and after, you need to add the word "high and low" after "ideological and artistic accomplishment". In sentence (10), the word "whether" needs to be added before "causing disputes" to make it collocate.
Through the analysis of the above sentences, it can be seen that whether one side and two sides match or not cannot only be based on whether the words correspond in the text structure, but should also focus on the content and analyze whether the previous and later sentences are consistent in the internal connection, so as to truly grasp The root cause of this type of disease sentence is to treat the symptoms and root causes. Analysis of "One Face to Two" Sentences in the Revision of Wrong Sentences In the revision of faulty sentences, whether the sentences before and after are corresponding to each other as a type is often very confusing. The following is an analysis of two aspects. (1) "One person faces two people". For the more obvious incorrect sentences, just pay attention to the key words between the preceding and following sentences. Example 1. Having a firm will is the key to a person's success in career. Example 2. A stable and united political situation is the key to the success or failure of my country's socialist modernization drive. In Examples 1 and 2, "whether there is" and "success", "a stable and united political situation" and "success or failure" cannot completely correspond. The following sentences are more complex: Example 3. Whether you can achieve a career does not depend on the level of your scores, but on your stronger abilities. Example 4. Whether the electronics industry can develop rapidly and widely penetrate into all walks of life, the key lies in accelerating training and cultivating a group of professional and technical talents. In Example 3, the first two sentences are correct, but "can" and "stronger ability" cannot be combined. Example 4 is quite confusing. "Can" should be included in "all walks of life". In the second sentence, "accelerate training and create a group of professional and technical talents" cannot be combined with "Can". For such sentences, it is necessary to analyze the relationship and semantics between the sentences and determine whether the collocations of all sentences are correct.