Comparison of military strength between the United States, China, Russia, France and Britain

National and total technical scale, industrial military management, national quality of potential nuclear weapons.

American 80 points1010101010;

Russia 6 1 min 77678899;

China 57 points 5109571145;

France 50 points 8454105311;

British 49 points 7454105311;

The above is a little old. 2006

Under 20 1 1 year

Jane's Defense Weekly published 20 1 1 the latest military ranking in the world, and China ranked fourth. The top five countries are the United States, French, Russian, China and Britain. As an authoritative western defense journal, Jane's also explained its reference indicators, including military expenditure, advanced military theory and technology, independent research and development capabilities, and national economic foundation.

Jane's description of America and Britain is relatively simple. The United States ranks first, mainly because it ranks first in the world in military science and technology and military expenditure, and is the leader in the reform of military theory in the world. In addition, the current military strength of the United States is developing into outer space and is gradually approaching zero casualties. Britain, a veteran power, ranks fifth because its current strength can no longer replace the United States. However, with its solid industrial base, advanced military technology and electronic technology, and the support of the United States, it is enough to maintain Britain's position as a world power.

Comparatively speaking, France, with a small land area, ranks second, mainly because it has an advanced and perfect military industry system, and its independent weapons research and development capability is the strongest in Europe.

Russia, ranked third, inherited 70% of the military strength of the former Soviet Union, with a solid foundation of heavy industry and developed military science and technology. In addition, this former superpower has super independent weapons research and development capabilities, and its independently developed SS-27 "Baiyang" nuclear intercontinental missile warhead can make an S-shaped maneuver when entering the atmosphere, which makes the US national missile defense system helpless. However, "Jane's" said that Russia's electronic technology, light industry, and technological processing are backward, resulting in the oversized advanced weapons developed by Russia, and some advanced electronic components are imported, and the life and quality of weapons are not as good as those of the West.

When it comes to China, Jane uses pen and ink the most. It believes that China ranks fourth because "after the Gulf War in the 1990s, China's decision-makers saw the gap between China's army and the world, gradually increased military spending, introduced many advanced military technologies and made great achievements".

Jane claimed that China's space technology and missile technology are ahead of Europe, the army has strengthened its information construction, and nuclear missile technology has certain strength. However, the basic industries in China are weak, and the processing technology needs to be improved. These weaknesses directly affect the quality of China's weapons.