Lu Xun doesn't need me to defend him, because Lu Xun can't defend him, so I will defend him.
The names that touts put on Lu Xun's head are very inappropriate. Most of the attackers attack those inappropriate names, but it seems that
It became Lu Xun's own fault.
Xiaofeng sent Li Ao's article comparing Lu Xun and Hu Shi. Is it true what Li Ao said? Yes, Li Ao is telling the truth, but
I think Li Ao made a mistake. In my opinion, Li Ao's accusation is very problematic.
The question is, if we say that Chekhov is not great enough, can we assume that Chekhov did not write as long as Tolstoy?
War and Peace as a reason? This is obviously unfair.
Let me talk about my impression of Lu Xun. In my opinion, Lu Xun is a pessimist at first.
It is only superficial to say that he is full of hatred for the world, but it may be more appropriate to say that he is full of despair for the world. You can have a look.
Wang Hui on Lu Xun's thought of "anti-despair". Selected Works of Qian Liqun in Memory of Lu Xun published by Shandong Literature and Art Publishing House.
There is also income, and it is a hardcover book. )
Among these works, I think I think Wild Grass Collection is a model.
Only in this way can we see the truer side of Lu Xun. The truer side of Lu Xun: he is a scholar and writer.
He is not a revolutionary. He wrote in a poem: the city head is changed to the king flag.
This easily reminds us of the Millennium swan song of "enriching the people and suffering the people".
Li Ao said: Lu Xun did not dare to oppose the Kuomintang. I don't think so.
Lu Xun may have said that he did not directly scold the Kuomintang, but this may not be a question of daring.
I mentioned earlier that Lu Xun is a pessimist. He was influenced by Nietzsche and Schopenhauer, which is often overlooked.
Mr. Lu Xun once said that convincing others and convincing yourself are two different things. Persuading people to be positive and talking about joining the WTO is easy to sink completely.
Obviously, Lu Xun's sorrow is not temporary, not because he has a Kuomintang government or a national government.
Those dictatorships are the root of Lu Xun's scolding. Otherwise, Lu Xun would not be a very sensitive and insightful writer in my mind.
Some people say that Qu Yuan's sorrow is temporary and Zhuang Sheng's pessimism is eternal. Lu Xun is closer to the latter. We can often see Lu Xun.
Novel, the most typical is medicine. What is written here is not a country or a nation, but a collective unconsciousness. Revolutionaries are nameless. This is more.
Rich in translation. This can be seen as the gap between the pioneers and the latecomers. Isn't that what human history is all about?
Is it winding? Li Ao said that Lu Xun scolded people all over China. What do China people deserve? I don't think so. Lu Xun is more concerned about the collective right to good and evil.
Numb to injustice.
What deserves more attention is Lu Xun's attitude towards this numbness. This attitude should be found in Lu Xun's most important novels. such
The attitude is not obvious, unlike Li Ao who stood up and said that the official character of the National Government was like an organ on him. Lu Xun's this
I think the attitude is reflected in the tone of Lu Xun's novels. The tone of Lu Xun's novels reminds me of Chekhov. And the idea is quite similar. It's just that Chekhov's brushwork is mild, so he shows sympathy, while Lu Xun prefers cool colors.
We have all read Sister Xianglin, and it is inevitable that Chinese books are full of such words: the author complains about the times.
This is just a political interpretation of works of art.
Lu Xun's novels are full of tragic meanings, which are not unique to an era. It's just its creative background.
Set things in a space-time with similar appearance.
Doesn't Xianglinsao's nervous breakdown remind us of Dostoevsky?
One or more similar fragments in a giant system? And are these delicate psychology just the characteristics of human psychology in an era?
When the characteristics of those times are stripped off, the artistry and tragedy of Lu Xun's novels can abstract some eternity.
The characteristics of. This is actually the most important thing. But as an artist, Lu Xun's achievements in this respect are often the most easily overlooked.
This is the sin of our descendants.
Who created such a typical figure as Ah Q, and who wrote such a figure as Kong Yiji? Who endowed the fragility and helplessness of human will with sad poetry in Regret for the Past? This can only be achieved through the artist's keen and unique expression. Which modern China can we find?
Has this writer ever painted better characters?
This is obviously our own problem. We twisted all the most noteworthy things of Lu Xun, and we took them one by one.
Now I want to say that Lu Xun is a pessimistic novelist (limited to short films), and many of his novels are very successful in art.
But Lu Xun is not an all-round writer or a literary master. He admitted it himself. When someone wanted to nominate him for Nobel Prize in Literature, he admitted that he didn't deserve this award, and said that no one in China deserved this award, and he was arrogant. Therefore, some people used to say that Lu Xun's literary status was not worthy of being a writer. Although it is true, it is not Lu Xun's fault.
Some people like to compare Lu Xun with Hu Shi, which is nothing wrong. But don't scold Hu Shi just because he is Lu Xun. This is meaningless.
Dostoevsky and Turgenev are still enemies. Turgenev laughed at the former's clumsiness in social situations, saying that his article was crazy nonsense;
The former even created a model for Turgenev in his own works, and he was ironic. But this is just one thing for these great writers.
Scrap.
Lu Xun scolded Hu Shi, but did Lu Xun become Lu Xun because of this scolding?
I don't deny that Lu Xun is overrated. It is unrealistically overestimated. This overestimation seems to be more than just an exaggerated compliment.
On the contrary, it is unrealistic depreciation. For example, Lu Xun is a revolutionary and thinker. In my opinion, this is not a compliment, but a downplay.
Lu Xun is the highest achiever of China's short stories.
If we make clear Lu Xun's achievements, then we won't take Hu Shi's ability to write "On the Masses and Contract Law" and "Lu Xun didn't dare to write, or we can say that Lu Xun didn't have such a cultural level to write these articles." Say something. Hu Shi has never written a novel like Ah Q? Master Li Ao's comparison between artists and scholars is problematic in itself. Lu Xun is an artist above all else. Artists rely more on intuition and instinctive insight to feel the world. The systematicness of their reading and the depth of their research on a problem are not emphasized in their major. Hu Shi is a scholar, and his scholarship is systematic research and extensive reading of materials.
Lu Xun is most familiar with his essays. How much artistic value are those articles? I don't think it's of much value, but these articles have their own functions. The effect lies in simplicity, directness and hitting the nail on the head. As I said before, Lu Xun is a pessimistic person. In Brodsky's words, such people: "They are not specific opponents of injustice, but rebels of the whole world order (more precisely, they disapprove)." They laughed at exposing all the absurd parts of the world. The skill to reveal these parts is prose. Hu Shi is a man at another level. To insist that Lu Xun has no cultural level to write Hu Shi's articles is nothing more than what I said at the beginning: Chekhov has no such level because he can't write Tolstoy's War and Peace.
In my opinion, Master Li Ao just used what Lu Xun didn't want to do to justify his original intention.
An important reputation. Is Master Li Ao going to liquidate Lu Xun or Lu Xun's false name? Lu Xun's reputation has long been irrelevant to Lu Xun. What Li Shifu wants to liquidate is those talents who are casually touted.
Fortunately, Li Ao is a master after all, and he will never forget to say this sentence: "So I can't help but stand up and show you the information, which proves Mao Zedong's words. Lu Xun was the leader of China's Cultural Revolution. He is not only a great writer, but also a great thinker and revolutionary. If these words are true, we will see where these thoughts of Lu Xun's criticism of the Kuomintang are. I can't find them. Where did Lu Xun's life revolutionize the Kuomintang?
What is Li Shifu dragging? Who does he really want to talk about?
One thing is certain, Li Shishi will not compare Lu Xun's thoughts with Hu Shi's. He compared Hu Shi and Lu Xun because of a fallacy and the confusion of later generations.
Is it Naruto?