What do I think about this: watching cartoons actually has advantages and disadvantages. Let me talk about the advantages and disadvantages respectively:
Benefits 1: Develop children's imagination
p>Cartoons are generally full of whimsical ideas, which naturally develop children's imagination and are readily accepted by children. They can also help children forget unpleasant experiences in reality.
Benefit 2 Cultivate children's sense of humor
Funny and humor are one of the basic elements of children's cartoons. Children are influenced by cartoons. Even if they cannot learn to create humor, they can at least learn to create humor. You can learn to appreciate humor.
Benefit 3: Bringing happiness to children
Looking at how obsessed children are with watching cartoons and feverishly imitating the characters in them, who can say that they are unhappy?
Benefit 4: Satisfy children’s thirst for knowledge
Children’s curiosity and interest will become more and more growing. They can find answers to many questions while watching cartoons, and they can answer them well. Very vivid, easy to accept and impressive.
Benefit 5: Purify children's minds
Excellent cartoons promote truth, goodness and beauty, provide some models and behavioral norms for imitation, promote the formation of children's concepts of right and wrong, and cultivate Children's good moral character.
Of course there are good and bad, and cartoons also have many adverse effects:
Adverse effects 1 Children have a strong tendency to imitate, and their ability to distinguish information is very weak. Young children Little ability to differentiate and little understanding of the connection between behavior and its consequences. Cartoons full of violence will cause children to cognitively rationalize violence, and they often use violence to solve problems in life.
Adverse effects 2: Watching cartoons for a long time relatively reduces the opportunities for outdoor activities, causing children to lose many opportunities to contact with real life, hindering children's true perception of natural substances and ability to move. Moreover, the lack of verbal communication with other people will affect children's speech expression ability to a certain extent.
Adverse effects 3: Watching cartoons for a long time will also cause certain harm to children's bodies. TVs have high-frequency radiation, and staring at the TV screen for a long time reduces the chance of children's eye movements, leading to vision loss. Eating while watching cartoons will reduce children's gastrointestinal digestive function and lead to a decline in physical health.
But to be honest, I still prefer watching cartoons. I think the advantages of cartoons outweigh the disadvantages
As for classics: I think classics have a relatively large impact on me. So I think classics also have many advantages:
For example: The advantage of classics is that they can cultivate a person's quality and give you a correct and elegant outlook on life.
The advantage of reading popular literature is that you can grasp the dynamics of social development and the direction of social development.
But the important thing is that you must know what is a true classic and what is good and popular.
Although modern and popular popular works can make people feel the flavor of the times and keep up with the trend, immortal classics embody the essence of human thought and art for generations, which can cultivate thoughts and sentiments and give people a profound feeling. thinking space. Reading classics and thinking about them from an early age is of great benefit to children's personality shaping. The world that children get to know and perceive through these immortal literary works, their knowledge and understanding of truth, goodness and beauty, fakeness, evil and ugliness, and their subtle acceptance of the philosophy of life are much deeper and more effective than the superficial preaching of our adults.
I am not saying that avant-garde literature is necessarily good, or even better than classics. There is always a lot of cultural accumulation in classics, and many great people grew up in classics. What exactly is a masterpiece? What qualifies as a masterpiece? I personally think of it with some emotion: masterpieces are books that are recognized and considered valuable by most people. So, are books that are not recognized as valuable by most people not worth reading? Our parents, teachers, and schools blindly recommend books that they consider “safe books” and “reasonable books.” Regardless of whether these books are good or not, children will feel bored or even rebellious before they even read them.
China’s translation and introduction of foreign literature is much slower than its economic development. So many people know the Japanese Haruki Murakami, but not the writer Borges. I firmly support the recommendation of Lu Xun's works, and I will support it even more in the future. He is the sharpest stick in China's wheat field.
I like classic classics
Personally, I would not say that I only like novels for teenagers rather than novels for adults, because I think there is no difference between teenagers or adults when reading classics. divided. I think the reason why some students don't like classics is because their understanding is still shallow, and it cannot be said that all adult positions are wrong. I not only like to read biographies such as "The Leader" and "My Father Deng Xiaoping", but also like classics. I remember when I was reading "The Romance of the Three Kingdoms", I felt that the language used in the book was very unique. It was different from foreign classics and different from domestic modern works. The famous book, its concise language and interesting story content made me crazy for it. During that period of time, my mind was filled with Zhang Fei, Guan Yu, Liu Bei and so on. Moreover, when I was writing during that period, I often used the words "Wo Ru" or "Wo Ru" consciously or unconsciously.
In terms of accumulating the essence of language vocabulary, classical masterpieces are more valuable than modern novels. I also liked reading "Gulliver's Travels" and was attracted by its rare and gorgeous language. I liked the content of this book very much, so I borrowed it that day and read it in one night.
Fashion and fashion are close to us
I raise one hand in favor of the teacher’s point of view.
For students of our age now, it is very important to cultivate a correct outlook on life and values, and many of these valuable knowledge wealth can be found in the famous works left by our predecessors. The famous novels contain fascinating descriptions of the environment; thought-provoking principles of life; positive spiritual concepts, etc. Therefore, reading classics can help us learn a lot, but a considerable number of our classmates have to avoid classics? My opinion is that we cannot find anything that arouses our interest in the classics. The things described in the classics are too far away from us. Famous masterpieces are authentic products that have been tempered by time and history. What is written in it is far away from us in time. The life in it is not the society we experience today. The poverty and wealth it writes about are also uncommon in our life. This kind of description is of the previous society, the previous oppression, and the previous expression.
And what kind of reading can attract us? It's fashion and fashion. Perhaps in the eyes of adults, in the eyes of parents, in the eyes of teachers, our choice is just vulgar and ordinary, just useless absorption. But in our eyes, this is a supreme enjoyment. It is written close to life, arouses our interest, is more in line with our tastes, and makes us want to read on. Just like we now know that McDonald's and KFC are "junk" foods, but we still go there and relish them. Eat it.
Let students make their own choices
Most of us do not read classics, but instead read "Harry Potter" which is very popular on campus. What's the reason? Reading famous books is very boring, and makes people not want to read any more than halfway through. Take "Journey to the West" as an example: the story is nothing more than about a group of monsters who are greedy for food. They catch Tang Monk and leave, but they don't eat every time. Waiting for Sun Wukong to come to rescue, the monster finally lost. Every time the story is just the same, nothing new, I don't want to read any more after reading it halfway. Indeed, famous works are also the crystallization of many kinds of wisdom. For example, "A Dream of Red Mansions" contains many mysteries, but where can you afford the time to decipher them one by one? Moreover, as long as it is a classic, it is a thick book with some wonderful sentences occasionally appearing in the book, and that's it.
If I were asked to choose, I would choose those that are shorter and have more lively and humorous text. It will be easy and interesting to read in this way, and the content should not always be the same. Nowadays, many people still read about many foods that are considered "junk" by professionals, which shows its benefits, because they contain life, and are not worthless as some people think. Reading more is always beneficial.
I think reading is about interest. If you are not interested, reading any book will be boring. I like to read fairy tales, jokes, and big stories. Some people like prose, and some people like poetry... Anyway, as long as you read it, It is beneficial to open books. Teachers should let students make their own choices. Therefore, if you read any book, you will get more. Read intensively what you like, read extensively what you don’t like, and don’t read what you are not interested in. Everything is fine as long as you like it. !
Choose useful books to read
Knowledge is boundless. Tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands of books are published every day around the world. A person's time and energy are limited. We We can never master all the knowledge, so we must choose the books that are most beneficial to us to read.
In the survey, it was found that students particularly like martial arts, romance novels, cartoons, science fiction, horror, and leisure books, such as: "Triple Gate", "Martial Arts Legend", "Digest", " "Meaning" and so on. Indeed, every book has its merits. For example: romance novels have beautiful language and fluent writing; martial arts novels have vivid language images and character descriptions; detective novels have vivid plots, meticulous reasoning, and exciting layouts. But how much have you benefited from reading these books, and how much knowledge have you learned?
Most of them are invalid reading and have no value. In addition, the plots of these books are too strong, and the content is low-level and vulgar. Students do not have strong self-control ability and can easily fall into story situations and cannot extricate themselves. They will also want to read them in class and self-study. This will definitely affect learning. In real life, there are many examples of people who are obsessed with the "chivalry" and "righteousness" in martial arts novels and get involved in fights, and who are obsessed with romance novels and fall in love too early and delay their studies. According to the teacher’s report, last year in the senior year of high school, a classmate with excellent academic performance dropped sharply because he was addicted to obscene books. In the end, he was not even admitted to the second-ranked university.
It is recommended that students read more Chinese and foreign classics. And many students are afraid of classics. A classmate expressed his own opinion in the questionnaire: "The famous book is huge in volume, has a lengthy plot, and has a slow pace. The era written in the book is far away from the present, and the background of the era and the relationship between the characters are difficult to understand." But, students, classics are the essence of culture that span thousands of years, and their ideological and literary value are unparalleled.
It has influenced several generations or even dozens of generations, and has been tested by readers and time for a long time. It has been handed down as an important cultural heritage of mankind. Its language, its plot, and its characters have a shocking effect on readers far away. It is not comparable to today's popular literature. The twenty kinds of works that we are required to read in the high school Chinese syllabus include "The Analects of Confucius", "The Romance of the Three Kingdoms", "A Dream of Red Mansions", "The Scream", "The Goddess", "Midnight", "Home", "Thunderstorm", " "The Siege", "Hamlet", "Don Quixote", "Goethe's Conversations", "Notre Dame de Paris", "Resurrection", "Eugénie Grandet", "Selected Poems of Pushkin", "Tagore" "Selected Poems", "The Old Man and the Sea", "Talking about Beautiful Letters", "The Pickwick Papers". Students, ask yourself, how many of them have you read? Think about it again, what are your plans for the future?
I suggest you read some famous adventure books: such as Robinson Crusoe and Greenford's Travels. . . . . . . . .
Okay, that’s all my opinion