Why sometimes the basketball court is full and no one plays badminton and table tennis?

Table tennis and badminton have always been the trump cards of sports in China. However, compared with the active situation of table tennis and badminton in China, the development of these two sports in the world has been repeatedly blocked. After Steve Denton proposed the possibility of canceling the individual World Table Tennis Championships, President Larson also said in an interview a few days ago that the voting system of "best of five games 1 1 minute" will be restarted after the 20265438 Tokyo Olympic Games. The scoring system of 1 1 was rejected two years ago, when most associations and athletes opposed it. But now we are about to enter the new Olympic year. Can this reform of promoting badminton to the world go smoothly? Why sometimes the basketball court is full and no one plays badminton and table tennis?

The World Badminton Federation has once again promoted the reform of "1 1 points system". Table tennis and badminton face the same problem. Dānlín may not wait for 1 1 integral system. Insist on reform, not afraid of unemployment, using this time without competition, many world sports federations have more time to brew a new round of reform. Badminton is one of them. Larsen, president of the World Badminton Federation, revealed in an interview that he would continue to promote badminton reorganization, that is, from the current competition system of two wins in three games1minute to the new competition system of three wins in five games 1 1 minute.

In fact, this is not the first time that BWF has put forward this idea. As early as 20 18, at the annual meeting of the World Badminton Federation, the brand-new scoring system of "three wins in five games, each game 1 1 point" was rejected because it failed to pass two-thirds of the votes. The main reason for the refusal was that it was too close to the Olympic Games at that time, and most members of the association were unwilling to take risks to make changes. Among them, the emerging badminton powers such as Japan, South Korea and Indonesia all expressed strong opposition. In last year's Sudirman Cup competition, Larsen once again mentioned the plan to change the badminton competition system to 5 sets 1 1 minute. In his view, the new competition system will make the competition more enjoyable. "Otherwise, this kind of competition will be too rigid and unattractive to the next generation of young people."

It can be seen that Larsson's attitude towards reform has always been firm. "The voting failed two years ago, but I firmly believe that the new scoring system will promote the development of badminton. So I insist. I also know that I may lose my job. " Shortening the competition time will make badminton more influential and attractive on TV. This will translate into more income, and the player's income will increase accordingly. "Larson explained the reform of the competition system as early as 1960. To this end, the World Badminton Federation has undergone many reforms in the past 20 years, and the competition system has changed no less than three times. Badminton 1992 began to use the "service scoring system" after entering the Olympic Games, and won 2 games in 3 games, with 15 points each; 200 1 was changed to the scoring system of three wins and seven points in five games, and then this system was cancelled in 2002, and the game was changed to 15 points.