at least meet the minimum word count requirement, or you will definitely lose points, and you can't exceed too much. One or two lines should be fine.
for the majority of candidates who take the civil service examination, it is difficult to apply for the exam. The difficulty lies in that the candidates don't know what kind of articles are the ones that meet the examiner's approval criteria, which shows the confusion of applying for the exam.
Examples With the given materials, with the topic "Protecting and helping street children is the common responsibility of the government and society", write an argumentative essay of more than 8 words from a self-made topic and a self-selected angle.
Scoring standard
1. No matter from which angle, it must be in line with "protecting and helping street children is the same responsibility of the government and society", closely related to the given materials, closely combined with social life and self-understanding, reflecting the characteristics of giving priority to arguments and convincing people with reasoning.
2. In specific writing, we can focus on government responsibility and social responsibility, but no matter which one we focus on, we must give consideration to the other, reflecting the dialectical and unified relationship between them.
3. Combining with practice, the analysis is in-depth and well-founded; Strong organization, complete structure and fluent language; Write neatly, clearly and without typos.
Scoring rules
1. Closely follow "Protecting and helping street children is the * * * same responsibility of the government and society", and discuss it in combination with the given materials and social reality.
2. It embodies the characteristics of giving priority to argumentation and convincing people by reasoning. The full text is based on theory, and there should be comments and explanations on viewpoints and countermeasures, which can be discussed in a narrative way, but not in a narrative way.
Pay attention to judging the countermeasure article:
The countermeasure is a part of the article, and there are discussions in other parts of the full text. No matter whether the countermeasure is discussed or not, it cannot be regarded as a countermeasure article.
if the content of countermeasures takes up a lot of space, the strategies should not only explain how to do it, but also explain why to do it, or what is the significance of doing it, or what are the positive effects of doing it, and what are the negative effects of not doing it. Only in this way can it be considered a discussion.
if the main part of the full text is all about countermeasures, and only a few dry lines talk about the same responsibility, without analysis, explanation and discussion, it is an unqualified article.
3. The topic of "protecting and helping street children is the * * * shared responsibility of the government and society" is very rich, but as long as it comes to * * * shared responsibility, it is relevant.
4. The analysis is thorough and well-founded; Clear organization and complete structure; Fluent language and neat writing.
5. In the specific scoring, you can judge flexibly according to the detailed rules.
five criteria for scoring
the first category: 41-5 points
the content is relevant, meets the topic requirements specified in the topic, and is targeted and dialectical. The argument is correct and insightful, the argument is full and powerful, the argument is rigorous, the content is comprehensive and substantial, and the political discussion is clear and coherent, and the theory is the main one. Reflect the stylistic characteristics of Shen Lun. The language is accurate and fluent, the writing is neat and tidy, and the writing is neat.
top: it meets the overall content requirements of the evaluation criteria and meets the requirements of the left column.
bottom: qualitative and relevant, in line with the requirements of the topic, appropriate content selection, prominent focus, clear views, strong logic, strong language expression skills, strong political style, and innovative content.
the second category: 31-4 points
the content is relevant, which basically meets the requirements of the topic, and the discussion is targeted. The argument is correct, the content is more substantial, the political discussion is more specific, targeted, the structure is rigorous, the argument is clear, the expression is good, the language is fluent, and individual typos and sick sentences are allowed. The writing is clear, and the scroll surface is neat.
above: relevant, correct in viewpoint, mainly based on theory, but more specific in discussion, able to aim at social life and one's own reality, fluent in language but with ill sentences and typos.
Next: To the point, the viewpoint is correct, but the main content is a little thin, with narration and discussion, but it is not based on theory, and the discussion is shallow, the language is fluent and not refined enough, and there are typos and sick sentences. The emphasis is on the countermeasures of government responsibility, but there are countermeasures analysis and evaluation elaboration. The language seems to have lyrical elements, but it has political characteristics and the content is more in line with the basic requirements.
the third category: 21-3 points
The content is relevant, still meets the requirements of the topic, with clear views, relatively in-depth discussion, basically complete structure, clear organization, not fluent language and many typos. The handwriting is not neat enough, and the handwriting is scrawled but can be recognized.
On the top, it can still cover the responsibility-related content, with a clear central point of view, but the main content is scattered, so the theory is weak, the structure is complete, the organization is clear, and the language expression is average.
Next: It is still possible to mention the meaning of * * * related to responsibilities, with a clear center and viewpoint, but the main content is scattered, or the whole content is single, focusing on how to perform it, or the content involves * * * the same responsibility, but it is a rigid countermeasure article, or the narrative language is poor.
the fourth category: 11-2 points
the content is basically relevant, so the theory lacks pertinence, the viewpoint is unclear, I don't know what to say, there are many false and empty rhetoric, and the structure is incomplete and messy. Unclear organization, poor language expression and many typos; The roll surface is very poor, and the handwriting is scrawled and illegible.
above: the content involves the protection of street children, but does not involve the perspective of responsibility; Or the main content digress, just a little to the protection and rescue immediately sidestepped, talking about other content, stealing the topic, poor structure and logic, individual political "minor injuries", but the whole is ok.
Next: mention the topic of street children, but the content is not the topic of responsibility, but other related street children (Weibo abducted and begged children); More than half of the words are copied from the material, the structure is incomplete, the organization is unclear, the language expression is poor, there are many typos, and the handwriting is illegible.
the fifth category: the content below 1 points
is off topic, misreading the given data, or irrelevant to the data content; Prefabricated board with poor language expression and no chapter; More than two-thirds of the words are copied from materials, or basically rewritten, abbreviated and pieced together into essays, poems and other issues, which are politically serious.
1. If the title is not written, two points will be deducted.
2. If the number of words is less than 8, 1 point will be deducted for every 5 words, and 2 points will be deducted at most. Less than 5 words, generally controlled under the three types of volumes.
3. The full text is illegible, and it is divided into three volumes.
4. The typo has been classified into the composition level, and no separate points will be deducted.
the website of Chinese public education publishes all kinds of public examination information at the first time, so it is recommended to pay attention to it in time. I wish the exam success!
.com? Wt.mc_id=bd1927
If you have any questions, please ask the Chinese public education enterprises.