Anna karenine, why did Anna die?

This question is particularly difficult to answer. It is difficult to push this problem back to its two biggest initiators: karenin and W Lenski, and the problems will only increase. There are more than two real executioners. What's more, many tragedies of these two people are beyond their control. I guess Douyou's confusion probably stems from his own worldview. Love is not bread, bread is bread, and love is dispensable relative to living. Li Du is the representative of this kind of values. The film begins with her husband's betrayal. Finally, she admitted, "Your brother is still like that, and he hasn't changed at all. I guess all men are like that ... "Then she mocked Anna:" Love. " Li Du looked at her with sympathy and reproach. "Yes, love." Anna said. Just like her answer to an era that is not worthy of her love. Li Du doesn't understand Anna, because she has neither seen nor experienced what happened to Anna. Readers and viewers can see clearly-that's why people shouldn't be judged by their own worldview. Novel is an observation, and film is another observation. It would be a pity if these observations only increase our prejudice against different types of people. On the contrary, observing more complex human nature in a panoramic way will make us know more about what human beings are and why they behave like this. Anna's two husbands, karenin and W. Lenski, both claimed to love Anna, but let her die. Their harm to her was fatal. If we have to compare, whose means is more horrible? My answer is karenin. Bean friends almost sympathize with the movie version of karenin, which also confirms this point: hypocrisy is more horrible than straightforward evil, because it is not easy to be detected. Can you imagine that this is what a husband said when he asked his wife for sex? Karenin has been completely institutionalized. Because he lives in the cold officialdom all the year round, because of his pursuit of power, and because of the image of a "saint" he wants to create, even the lust belonging to men has been castrated. So, sadly, karenin can only rely on political topics-what really stimulates him-to produce lust. There are many similar clips in the movie. Karenin wants to save her: because this is his woman, his wife in the legal sense, "the marriage is an act of God (on karenin)" ... The sense of salvation overrides Anna's sincerity and completely becomes his own understanding of "goodwill". In this sense, although karenin is more ruthless to Anna, she is also more "sympathetic"-this is not contradictory. When a person's thoughts and actions are limited by the times and environment, it is hard to blame him for not "leaving". After all, his opponent is too strong. It is more obscene, cruel and horrible for a hypocritical person to do e than to do good. To sum up, my personal impression is more stupid-stupid enough not to know it. In the film, karenin pretends to be the countess's hand and finishes the final blow to Anna with a letter-Anna wrote a letter asking to visit her son. Even karenin, who is punishing Anna with "grounding", thinks it is cruel to visit her on her birthday. Then the countess volunteered: Stop it, I'll come! In this way, karenin not only kept his holiness, but also achieved his goal. No one with a conscience can attack his wife like this, but a person with a sense of saints can do it, and it is just and compassionate ... At this time, Anna has been trapped at home and abroad and is on the verge of despair. Externally, society abandoned her; My son is out of sight, his health is getting worse and worse, and he can't sleep at night; And karenin's marriage has been dragged on, he said neither from nor from, she can't aboveboard with w lenski. There's only one way. This only salvation once gave Anna great power. At that time, after recovering from a serious illness, she naturally expected to reunite with W. Lenski. In this regard, karenin threatened, "The law is on the side of men. If you divorce, you have nothing, and you have no right to get married. You and Lenski will live together illegally forever. " Anna trembled and resisted: "But you forget that I love W Lenski and W Lenski loves me!" " Karenin threatened the "worst case" and Anna used it to resist the "final redemption". As the sole owner of this redemption, did W. Lenski give her enough love? This is almost impossible to analyze. With regard to love, the unified caliber of the world is "I love you", but in fact, the specific content of "love" is far from everyone. What's more, there are differences between men and women, differences in sensibility and weaknesses in personality. "How much is it?" Anna asked again. W. Lenski didn't answer directly, but borrowed their posture and replied, "So much." This is a metaphor, W Lenski's love is desire. As far as desire is concerned, W Lenski did his duty. He gave up his reputation for her and took her to Europe ... all for being with her ... Do it. In the past, the two lovers have completely different views on their trip to Europe: Anna thinks she is unforgivable happiness. W Lenski thinks this kind of happiness is just a grain of sand in the tower of happiness-there is nothing he can do about it. From the moment when desire is filled, happiness will decrease step by step.