Why were ancient women virtuous but not talented?

Due to the influence of ancient feudal thought, most ancient women would not receive education. For ancient men, it is good to think that men should do something useful to defend the country. For women, because the status of ancient women was very low, they thought that women didn't need education, just needed to stay at home and wait on their in-laws, do housework well, and learn some piano, chess, calligraphy and painting if they had money.

In ancient times, even the ladies of rich families, in a family behind closed doors, read books of three obedience and four virtues. So for rich girls, it's mostly piano, chess, calligraphy and painting, or three obedience and four virtues. For poor families in ancient times, because books and pen and ink were very valuable things at that time, only men were qualified to study in poor families, while for women, it was good to serve in-laws or do farm work and housework.

However, even men, for the poor families in ancient times, if they want to give up a scholar, it must be the strength of the whole village or family. So generally speaking, for those from poor families, most men have never read a book, let alone women with low status.

Therefore, in ancient times, women were educated by feudal ideology, and with the social and family environment at that time, women would not study. Where's will? No talent is virtue? It is sad that ancient women instilled new ideas in women and made them always abide by this rule. Although there was no rule in ancient times that women could not study, in ancient times, for men, in order to ensure their status would not be shaken, they would choose to let ancient women not study. Even if they study, they will learn some knowledge that is beneficial to the status of ancient men. So, for ancient women, they always believed in their own psychology? The idea that a woman without talent is a virtue? And this concept has always made women succumb to this patriarchal society.