The insights and reflections on the "Anji" game are written as follows:
Anji Game has completely subverted the traditional Chinese early childhood education model. The games generated by children are far superior to the games preset by teachers. . In "Anji's Game", the role of teachers is also changing.
Anji advocates teachers: "Keep your mouth, keep your hands, open your eyes, and prick your ears." Teachers get rid of the repetitive teaching leaders in the past and turn around. Became a bystander, even an admirer of young children. Teachers also sincerely lamented that children are better at thinking and playing than we are, and we should learn from them and "understand" them in games. These are in sharp contrast to our daily work.
In the face of the success of "Anji Games", I look back and think about myself. Now we are still repeating the educational mistake of "working hard to mislead the children" every day. We learn from it and find out the reasons. There are three main aspects that we still need to improve:
First, teachers’ concepts must change and the dominant position of games must be given up. Children are the biggest controllers of the game, and teachers must dare to let go. If the teacher's teachings are repeated day after day, the child's creativity and imagination will be gone forever, and the child's future growth path will be worrying.
2. The form of the game must be changed, and the traditional game methods must be boldly broken. Our game materials are too restrictive, and we do not give children the opportunity to try the "Anji Games" category. Game venues cannot be limited to classroom teaching and regional activities, and regional activity materials cannot be limited to desktops and forms limited to buying and selling. Give children a new world and they will give us a new horizon.
3. The role of the teacher must change, from a coach to a "spectator". As long as teachers break away from the tedious teaching work, they can calmly devote themselves to observing and thinking about young children. It seems that the workload is reduced, but the work efficiency is maximized, and on the contrary, the educational process is vigorously promoted.