Poetry, if it pursues the comprehensibility of others, then logic will still exist among those who are pursued to understand it.
For example, we use the terms "garden, sun, stars, roses, and six carriages" to express the same direction in a complete text. That is to say, even though those concepts described in different literal terms (here are just some noun concepts as examples) are likely to be linked to different intentions, at a level that can be understood, it will not also One should not pursue a trait that is changeable and complex. Doing so will only lose the comprehensible logical requirements of language expression (here, logic is not the real purpose of language, but the meaning of language is to be understood by others). Unless there is a clear and specific explanation for each changed use, such use can only be illogical and incomprehensible.
Of course, in poetry, perhaps what is pursued is not Understanding in the true sense is a kind of complex emotional synaesthesia. Perhaps it can be regarded as the purpose of expression that some poets originally resorted to, but this is not the case. Far away from the basic requirements of language being logical, it would be difficult to make a meaningful distinction between a piece of poetry, prose, a novel, and a bunch of nonsense graffiti on the wall.