The supplement to Yang Shihong's theory is actually a theory based on the future in the Northern Song Dynasty. See "Compilation and Translation of Pipe Tapes" on page 1552. Yu Wenbao's "Blowing Sword Record" said: "Modern poets prefer the late Tang style. I don't know until this point in the Tang Dynasty, the pulse was slightly immersed, as in the middle period, but Li, Du, Yuan and Bai Xiongqi were unable to do so. Today is not the body of the middle Tang Dynasty, but the mourning of the late Tang Dynasty. I don't want to learn. " Calling it "the prosperity of the middle Tang Dynasty" means that the writer's life is the prosperity of the Tang Dynasty, and the writer's chapter is the prosperity of the Tang Dynasty. No, okay. Ye Hengshan's Preface to School Wonderful Tang Poems said: "From the beginning, the concept of chastity was correct at that time, and poetry could not resist change"; This is also the purpose. Zuo Ren and Zhou Bian Huang's "Nine Smoke Prehistoric Collection" Volume 1 "A Quick Preface to Tang Poetry" says: "There were three hundred sacrifices in the Tang Dynasty. Without tomorrow, there will be no today, and without tomorrow, there will be this year. Those who are early, prosperous, middle and late should learn from the world. Can this be used to determine the poet's high position? Or the order of spring, summer, autumn and winter. In the four sequences, each has its own beautiful scenery and each has its own wind and rain. It cannot be said that summer is worse than spring, and winter is worse than autumn. Returning to spring after winter, it is safe to say that next spring will be worse than this winter. " It means that the tip of the pen can be pleasant.
Poetry has its own beginning, prosperity, middle and late, not the beginning, prosperity, middle and late of the world. Therefore, Jiang's "Zhanyuan Unfinished Draft" Volume 4 "Preface to the Samadhi Collection of Tang Xian", that is to say, "The four Tang Dynasties should not be based on the poet's year and month. For example, Mao's poems are the father of reciting. He was hired by Huan Gong for eight years and asked for a car for fifteen years. His poems are harmless. The great man who left the army, seeing the chaos in Xijing, was the predecessor of Zhou Dong's migration, and his poem "Don't give up for the king and the wind" goes. "Thought also, and compromise, enough, but failed to distinguish its style. Tang poetry and Song poetry are not only different from each other, but also different in style and character. There are two kinds of people and two kinds of poems in the world. Tang poetry is known for its richness and rhyme, while Song poetry wins by reason. Yan Yiqing first advocated the poem of breaking words, and Cang Hua said that "people in the present age are still rational, while people in the Tang Dynasty are still interested in prosperity". Song, especially the general, is easy to write. It is not that Tang poetry must come from Tang people, but Song poetry must come from Song people. Therefore, Shaoling, Changli, Xiangshan and Dongye in the Tang Dynasty were the forerunners of the Song Dynasty. Keshan, Baishi, Nine Monks and Four Spirits in the Song Dynasty were all Song people. Yang Chengzhai's Collection (Volume 79) Preface to Poetry of Jiangxi School said: "Poetry is also in Jiangxi, not everyone is in Jiangxi. "Volume 95 of The Complete Works of Liu Hou Village and Preface of Jiangxi Poetry School still doubt that Houshan, Lingyang, Zimian, Fujun and Erlin are not from Jiangxi, and it seems that they have never heard of this. People in the Tang and Song Dynasties were slightly different from Yang Xu. Queen Anne, the matriarch of England18th century, came to Korea, and her first pronoun was the literature of the Roman emperor. According to this name, I first saw it in Goldsmith: Bees, the eighth, the second article, "An account of Augustus' era in England. "At that time, the chief producer of the literary circle was Andy Sheng, but the body was determined. In fact, it was called the monitor by women in the nineteenth century. See Bona, My Daubray: Biological Papers, Third joseph addison: The First Victorian Age. This is an example of knowing the difference between an article and a chapter. At first, it was not limited to the owner's name, both at home and abroad. Schiller, a German poet, wrote an article about ü ber Naive und sentimental Ische Dichtung, saying that there are only two kinds of poems: ancient poems are really simple and natural, and today's poems are engraved with ideas: one is virtuous and the other is smart. Gu Fu himself noticed: "The difference between today and the past is not in the times, but in the system of speech and style"; Although there is no new research project yet, it does not reflect the author's point of view. Therefore, there are ancient poets, modern poets, and one person who is mixed with modern poets. See coherence de flaubert, éedition Louis Conard, Ie série, p.385 Poets are divided into two categories according to their worship of Flaubert; The meaning of the word coincides with the meaning of the seat. See Coherence de Flaubert, é dition Louis Conard, Ie s é rie, p.385 Schiller endowed ancient poets with things, rather than creating the world for the emperor, and people saw magical works. I didn't see the emperor (Wiedie Gottheit Hinter DEM Weltga Bade Sosteht Hinter Seinemwerk-S.183). The worship of Fulou also means that the emperor is everywhere, but nowhere to be seen; I am in the author's book, it should be like this. What an artist does in his works is invisible and powerful in his creation; I want to say, but I don't want to say. ) Very clever. See Corr, IVe série, page 164. Flaubert's letters and letters repeatedly stated his intentions. Yes or no, it is impossible to carve a boat for a sword. C.D.Le Groclark translated Dongpo Fu into a book in English, and the rest is a proverb, that is, the Tang and Song Dynasties in the time zone, which is different from Schiller's poems in ancient and modern times. Later, I saw Wu Yu's Preface to Genzhai Poetry, and I thought so. Everyone has his own nature, and everyone has his own prejudice. It's a poem with sound, the highest one is close to the Tang Dynasty, and the sinking one is in the Song Dynasty, which comes unexpectedly. Therefore, since the Song Dynasty, people have come out from the Yuan Dynasty, the Ming Dynasty and the Qing Dynasty, and their actions can be divided into Tang and Song Dynasties. There is no such case in the Tang Dynasty, Han and Wei Dynasties and the previous six periods, although they were muddy and did not draw, but accumulated without making a fortune. Ye Hengshan's "Original Poetry" contains two clouds: "If the ground is full of wood, Song poetry can blossom and wood can accomplish things. Since the Song Dynasty, subsequent poems have been thanked without flowers, and reopened after thanks. "
Ye Hengshan's Four Volumes of Original Poems complements He Dafu, ridiculing Li's poems as "entering the Song Dynasty", saying: "Li doesn't read Tang poems, but he can't have Song poems in his eyes. If you don't taste your eyes and kiss yourself from a distance, then this heart is the same, but it doesn't matter. " In other words, the division of poetry into Tang and Song Dynasties is also based on the difference of temperament, not just the judgment of the times, so it can be in tune with the world. Saint Pei Wei likes to say "les familles d 'esprit". People who talk about "Morphologie" in Germany recently don't regard a family as an intellectual (intellectus archetypus, intellectus ectypus), which is also seen in Germany.
Jiang Xinyu's Poem Collection of Zhongyatang (Volume XIII) On Poems says: "Both Tang and Song Dynasties were great men, and each became a generation of poems. After the Song Dynasty gave birth to the Tang Dynasty, it was really difficult to break the ice. Yuan He can't change, not only because of the decline of Qi. What can be done is endless, and it is even more difficult. " It can be seen that the May 7th speech is divided into Tang and Song Dynasties, and the analogy is so extreme that there are two kinds of documents, both of which are based on the "mysterious consideration" and "bright and white" judgment of hostages. See Liu Shao's article "Nine Characters". According to Jung, psychologists distinguish introverts from extroverts. It is said that it is not a dynasty. But there are still old people, or abuse the present and respect the ancient, saying that Song poetry is too close, why not take the law? Or Tang poetry is too ancient. It is appropriate to learn from Xun Qing as a queen. You can definitely come down. And within another episode, in my life, it only took a few years to get angry, so it became tang style, and it became a late thinking tune. If the wood is bright, the scenery is awkward, the heart light is different, and the heart sound is also the first. The king of the Ming Dynasty can testify when he is in Guangzhou. Seven sons of Jiajing, Yizhou, are actually the crown; Words and prose must be westernized and sinicized, and words and poems must flourish in the Tang Dynasty. Murphy is a famous figure in these four manuscripts. However, the sequel to Yizhou has become arrogant, almost a scar on the text and a scratch on the law. Repeatedly rhymes with Dongpo's poems. Volume 41 of the Preface to Selected Poems of Song Dynasty says that those who try to suppress Song poetry "cherish the past", but this is not to apply for Song, but to use Song. Su Changgong's "Preface to External Discipline", volume 42, is full of feelings for Dongpo. He said: "When I was young and strong, I studied ancient characters, so I couldn't get in among the four schools, but I decided later." Not to mention Su Guanwen, the poem with elegant and miscellaneous topics, although it can't be used by me, it is enough for me. "After reading the book, the fourth volume" Shu Sushi "said:" When the Dragon Palace poetry is in existence, the world is interesting, such as the invitation of the princes of the Western Chu Dynasty. After that, if the war ends, it will be unified and no longer belong to it. Although there are good people today, I dare not tell others. It's embarrassing, too. I was surprised to be late. "The following article expounds Dongpo's divine characteristics and Shaoling's poetic art, and can be used to discuss Dongpo's language and his early work Four Drafts (volume 147) and Yiyuan Yan Shu." Yan Yan takes Xiangshan and Jiannan as the main religions and Dongpo as the main religion outside the world, saying: "Su Baichen"; In this case, it is very different for Sue to meet Du directly. In Volume 46 of the Four Drafts, Tell the Truth after Drunk, it is said: "I don't have to bury it even if I die, so I can teach him to be happy and worry about flying kites", and the whole story of "Liu Ling being buried when he hears it" is necessary, which means that the early works of Yizhou have touched Su Shi's poems. Although the words are still negative and high-pitched, they don't want to show it, but they are deeply convinced. Therefore, Qian Muzhai's "Poem of the Dynasty" and Zhou Oak Garden's "Shadow of the Tree House" all remember that the country is in danger, and the collection of hand slopes cannot be released. If you want to be able to collect ancestors in the Tang and Song Dynasties, it is very important to have a relationship with the year. According to this, it can be seen that the study of poetry in Yizhou's early and later years is different, which does not mean that Yizhou's poetry in his later years is better than that in his early years. In the Preface to Ten Poems in Taicang, Volume 30 of the Collection of Letters from Wu Meicun, it is extremely public to say that "those who save Nideod's poems, those who want to save them, those who are self-deprecating at the peak, and those who are self-deprecating at the end". There is nothing in the sequel to Yizhou, which is meaningful and dull, so it is not as good as the previous one. Those who fail to reach the Tao will go from bad to worse. Poets who recently came to the lake, such as Chen and Cheng Shifa, changed from Tang Dynasty to Song Dynasty, which are worthy of emulation. The dispute between Tang and Song poetry occurred in the Southern Song Dynasty, but it did not exist since the Ming Dynasty. It is also early for Yuan Zicai to quote Xu Langzhai's language and other theories in Volume 16 of "Book with Shilan" and "Poetry with Garden". For example, Dai Min's "Dongye Nongge Collection", Volume 4, "Answering Tang and Song Poets" said: "You don't have to carve a shovel to spit out your lungs and intestines, but you can be proud of your words, that is, a chapter. There is no need to distinguish between Song and Tang Dynasties and primitive sexual feelings. "
As a supplement to The Collected Works of Mr. Sun Yuefeng compiled by Sun Kuang, Volume 9 and Li Yutian's Essays, Wang Shizhen said: "The pulse of Fengzhou originated from Zishi, which was slightly mixed with the Six Dynasties, and was later decorated with Zuo Zhuang and Zichang. Handsome hair is also close to Buddha, but it is not pure. The self-proclaimed "national policy" is exactly what Zi Zhanzu heard. " Then Wang's veteran "Dongpo Collection" will not be released, and he will return in his later years, leaving a good ear for a few years. "Wen Zi Daoyuan" says: "Those who are far away will return." The Ming Dynasty inherited the Tang and Song Dynasties, and the post-French king succeeded, while the pre-French king rebelled. The first seven sons will go down the river from the beginning, and then go against the current to restore the ancient style. Wang Jiusi said in his book Tombstone: "I like Han Su's works in Tang and Song Dynasties, especially Jia You Ji. At the beginning of Kang Hai, the teaching of Laoquan was the foundation of chastity in the world. Also, according to Dai Dongye's poems, we can see the first volume of Shao Xiang's poems of the Qing Dynasty in Nanling, entitled "Self-topic of Sparse Garden Collection". Only "don't use" as "safe use", the word is almost the same, it will make the heart close, restrain the arrogance of Zhang Dan, and "sexy is different from today".
I don't know the difference in tone, but I am the true nature; Although sex is the main reason, it can also change luck. Difficult to divide water; I am afraid that I have differences, so I will not gather together. The theory of liver and gallbladder in Zhuangzi's De Chong Fu and the question of water and moon in Dongpo's Red Wall Fu can confuse Dongye. Qian Zhongshu said in Poems of Tang and Song Dynasties: "The poems of Tang and Song Dynasties are not only different in dynasty, but also different in physique. There are two kinds of people and two kinds of poems. " Generosity means that poetry can change with the times or remain unchanged. Poetry is written by people. People don't change, and poetry doesn't change. And people, changing, are "two kinds of people." Therefore, there are ancient poets who are today's poets, modern poets who are ancient poets, and one person who combines modern and ancient poets. The "third person" is just a synthesis of "two kinds of people". In my popular language, the role of the times in poetry is "decisive and uncertain". What is this? Why not?
Tang poetry and Song poetry have different styles. Qian said: "Tang poetry is good at rhyme, while Song poetry is good at reasoning with bones and muscles"; That is, what Yan Canglang meant: "People in this dynasty are still rational, while people in the Tang Dynasty are still interesting"; Or as Schiller, a German poet, said, "Ancient poetry was really simple and natural, but today's poetry is engraved with ideas: one is called virtue, and the other is called intelligence." Therefore, "Gu Fu said to himself:' The so-called difference between ancient and modern is not in the times, but in the system'-there are no poets of the times, only poets of the times. What is this? Why not?
Listen to Julie's song "If spilled, if sold": "Have we changed the world? Or has the world changed you and me? " It's really a very old philosophy, chicken lays eggs, and eggs lay chickens. James, an American pragmatist, once divided people into rigid people and flexible people. Then the ancient and modern philosophy is divided into rigid philosophy and flexible philosophy. We have to ask: how did people become rigid people? What makes you a flexible person? That is: why are "local people" and "sensible"? Why do "people in the Tang Dynasty" care about their own interests? After reading all the talk about "heroes make the times", I want to ask, don't times make heroes? Don't times have any influence and function on people? Is there really no poet of the times? Is there only the role of "two kinds of people" in the transformation of Tang poetry into Song poetry, and there is no flavor of the times in the middle?
Hu Shi said in "Sailing on Liangshan": "I have determined the trend of China's poetry history, from Tang poetry to Song poetry. There is nothing mysterious, but poetry is closer to composition! Closer to the conversation. Modern poets are happy to write Song poems, but they have never understood the advantages of Song poems. The great contribution of the great poets in the Song Dynasty is only to break the shackles of temperament since the Six Dynasties and strive to create a poetic style close to words. " But why did the Song people "break the melody since the Six Dynasties"? As Tang Degang pointed out in the translation of Hu Shi's Oral Autobiography: "Anyone who manages the history of China literature from the present perspective, such as Hu Shi, Chen Duxiu and Qian, all admit that the mainstream of literature in Yuan, Ming and Qing Dynasties is' popular literature'. But why did' popular literature' suddenly rise in the Yuan and Ming Dynasties? They only know what it is, but they don't know why. " This is why, in fact, the times have changed, the people who eat have changed, and there is a citizen class in the cities of China, and there is a market for cultural consumption. Therefore, reading the history of China literature cannot be separated from China's political, social and economic history.
Qian Mu said: The "Chaju" system in Han Dynasty finally developed from the "Confucian Classics" in Wei, Jin, Southern and Northern Dynasties. In the Tang Dynasty, Xie Wang's children didn't even want to marry the emperor's daughter because of their family background. In the Tang Dynasty, "tea ceremony" was changed to "imperial examination", so "the literary selection was bad and the scholar was half; The literary selections are ripe, and the scholars are full. " "Temperament of the Six Dynasties" is really a thing for the Tang people to eat. From the Five Dynasties to the Song Dynasty, we read the biography of Su Dongpo by Lin Yutang, and we studied Dongpo. Because "Wen" is unknown to "Poetry", composition reasoning has become the basis for choosing scholars. As Zeng Guofan said, "Classical Chinese is the least suitable for reasoning." Therefore, in the Tang and Song Dynasties, Zen used vernacular style. Therefore, it is natural for Song people to break the "temperament of the Six Dynasties" and make poetry closer to composition and speech.
After all, people are economic animals. If the people who eat change, so will people. People have changed, and poetry should remain the same. Although it does not hinder "Shaoling, Changli, Xiangshan and Dongye in the Tang Dynasty, they are pioneers of the Song Dynasty; Keshan, Baishi, Nine Monks and Four Spirits in the Song Dynasty were poets in the Tang Dynasty, but "keeping pace with the times" is indeed the mainstream of the times. " Three generations don't follow etiquette, and five emperors don't learn music. Ceremony, when its big "also.
Specifically, Tang poetry has reached its peak, and Song people are eager for it. From this point of view, without poetic chic, the artistic conception of Tang poetry is natural and beautiful, while Song poetry focuses on emotion and reason, without eloquent artistic conception. This can also be regarded as the basic condition for the success of Song poetry, and the dignitaries in the Tang Dynasty were in a superior mood. In this respect, the Song Dynasty also lost to the Tang poetry.