It means that people who have no feelings for their children are not necessarily true heroes. How can loving children not be a true man?
From "Reply to Guests", it is a seven-character quatrain written by the modern writer Lu Xun in 1931. The first two sentences of this poem make a positive argument and cover most of the points. They first clarify the essence of "ruthlessness" and "pity for children". The first two sentences of this poem, "A ruthless man may not be a true hero, and a pity for a son is not a husband." They are solid and powerful and have irrefutable power. They are widely circulated famous sentences.
The original text is as follows:
A ruthless man may not be a true hero, and how can he not be a husband if he pities his son.
Do you know that those who stir up the wind and roar will look smaller than a dodder when they look back?
The translation is as follows:
People who have no feelings for their children are not necessarily true heroes. How can loving children not be a true man?
Did you know that the tiger roaring in the forest always looks back at the little tiger?
Annotations are as follows:
诮(qiào): ridicule.
Husband: refers to a man who has done something.
The one who stirs up the wind and roars: refers to the tiger. The tiger roars in the wind, describing the power of the tiger.
Móu: refers to the eyes. Yu Tu (wū tú): Another name for tiger.
Extended information:
The first two sentences of this poem, "A ruthless person may not be a true hero, how can a pity for a child not be a husband", solid and powerful, with irrefutable power, is a widely circulated poem Famous quotes. The author does not use much pen and ink to explain the whole story of the plot. He uses philosophical verses from the beginning to eloquently point out that those who are "ruthless" may not be true heroes, but those who "pity children" can be true men.
The poem effectively hits back at those commentators who play with "sentiment" and "ruthless" in the abstract, and sternly points out that people who boo themselves as "ruthless" are not heroes, and those who use "merciless" to attack others are not heroes. , to show one's "ruthlessness" is even more despicable and ridiculous. In Lu Xun's view, whether a hero is a hero does not depend on whether he has pity for his son, but on whether he is ruthless to his enemies.
The poem first uses the word "not necessarily" to deny the "heartless" theorists, and then uses the word "how" to question and attack those who "pity the child", leaving them speechless. These two poems are written in antithesis, but they are not a pair of feelings or scenes, but a pair of reasons.
It is very philosophical. The momentum is also very strong. Under the public criticism at that time, Lu Xun justifiably loved his son, and extended this feeling to the broad masses of the people, which was true to his true nature as a husband. However, those who claim to be "ruthless" have nothing to do with heroes.
The poet denounced the "ruthless" theorists and did not avoid "pity for the child". On the contrary, he used "pity for the child" to prove the despicability of the attacker, which completely gained the initiative. The meaning of these two poems is profound, and they are contradictory to each other. There are negations, affirmations, judgments, and questions. They are effortless and easy, making the sarcastic person look for trouble and reveal his true colors.
Baidu Encyclopedia - Answering questions