Topic design Shakespeare once wrote a passionate and sincere ode to human demeanor: "What an amazing masterpiece human beings are! What noble reason! What great power! What graceful appearance!" What an elegant move! How like an angel in action! How like a god in wisdom! The essence of the universe, the primate of all things!" Style is colored by wisdom, sentiment, character, and cultivation, and painted by words and deeds. This is a beautiful and colorful painting. Please write an argumentative essay on the topic of "style". The idea is your own, the title is your own, no less than 800 words. Writing guidance: Reference idea for this topic: 1. Making friends and conducting yourself in the world. , the most important word is "demeanor". Good demeanor is admirable and enviable, and has undeniable aesthetic value. Second, demeanor does not necessarily mean being knowledgeable, powerful, or wealthy. Demeanor First of all, it is a kind of self-cultivation, a kind of inner enrichment, and an expression of confidence in oneself. Third, demeanor is reflected in real life, which means speaking appropriately, dressing neatly and decently, behaving in a gentle and elegant manner, having a natural and sincere attitude, working conscientiously, and being honest. Be trustworthy, live a frugal and healthy life, have unique and profound insights, and have an elegant and refined taste... The topic is written as an argumentative essay, and the points can be designed as follows: ① Style is a virtue, a well-educated and perfect temperament and style (what is it) ); ② With grace, you can be respected by others, enhance love between people, and be conducive to living in harmony (why); ③ To have grace, you must strengthen moral cultivation, abandon vulgar words and deeds, and consciously cultivate good sentiments (how) ). Refer to the topic: character + magnanimity = demeanor. Student Example: The Loser’s Demeanor □Su Liting Losing and winning always go hand in hand in the arena. People often give applause and flowers to the winner, but often ignore the other party. In fact, A person's demeanor and quality can best reflect his attitude towards failure. "Being able to lose" is not easy to achieve. This mentality is formed during a long period of hard work and requires daily accumulation. Therefore, a person Whether an athlete is mature and experienced can be seen from his attitude towards failure. I still remember the farce of young Chen Qi in Kobe, Japan. He threw his racket and kicked the block, and was accused of losing again and again. People have caused a lot of discussion and thinking. This is a common thing on the playing field. It is not surprising to throw rackets, swear and even fight. But analysis shows that most of the "perpetrators" are still in the growth stage, and they often Inexperienced but full of arrogance. Uncles like Zidane who hit their stomachs with their bald heads are still quite rare. Veterans mostly treat failures calmly. For example, Lao Wa was defeated 0:4 in the last international competition and failed. It brought a perfect end to his brilliant table tennis career, but he was still able to talk and laugh happily at the press conference, which made people have to admire his general demeanor. The cultivation of a person and the spirit of a country can also be achieved in the moment of winning or losing. It was clearly revealed. Same thing about table tennis. That time, Liu Guozheng met Boll. At 12:13 of the seventh game, Liu Guozheng returned the ball and the ball fell to the floor. The air in the Shanghai Stadium seemed to freeze immediately - if it went out of bounds , which meant that Liu Guozheng was out. At this moment, a person reached out and signaled to the referee: "The ball missed the edge!" This person was none other than Bol! 13 draws, the referee raised his right hand. Following the Chinese fans twice To overwhelming applause, Liu Guozheng finally came back to win at 15:13. Boll lost the game, but won with grace. The whole world saw his brilliance that was better than that of a king. Another touch came from Beijing's Olympic bid. It is unforgettable, when Sa After Chairman Malanchi announced that Beijing had won the right to host, representatives from various countries sincerely embraced and blessed each other. Yes, when the competition comes to an end, it is no longer important who loses and who wins; winning truthfully and losing magnanimously, this is the real thing. Gentleman's demeanor. Success or failure is not all about victory or defeat. Even if you lose, you can still be vigorous and win the respect of others and even opponents. In the American Civil War, the Southern Army suffered a disastrous defeat. The always proud Southern soldiers were unwilling to admit the reality. They strongly demanded that their commander, General Lee, go up the mountain. They fought guerrillas and vowed not to surrender to the Yankees. However, General Lee, who was usually very brave, persuaded everyone to surrender: "If we lose the battle, we have lost the battle. We must admit that what is more important is that we must lose with grace." The commander-in-chief of the Northern Army was so impressed by General Lee's demeanor that he gave General Lee his favorite cigar as a gift. This is enough to show General Lee's "losing" style. Losing gracefully is an ability and a quality. It is also a kind of wisdom. The "game" is over and the winner has been decided, but the judgment of "lose" and "win" goes beyond that. Comments: The topic of "style" is very broad. Big questions should be made small, and broad questions should be " Su Liting handled this aspect very appropriately. She focused on "a person's demeanor and quality, which best reflects his attitude towards failure". The heavy hammer blow naturally made it easier to discuss in depth and explain. Thorough. In the selection of specific materials, the author also shows his own ingenuity. She mainly uses examples from sports competitions (especially table tennis competitions) as arguments. She talks eloquently and contrasts clearly, which is very persuasive and credible. Readability.