How to create ancient poetry?

Because at present, too many "critics" criticize poetry, almost all of them take cadence as the first element, which I think is incorrect. Therefore, the significance of the composition is just to explain that we should not pay too much attention to the "method" of poetry, such as leveling, rhyming and antithesis, but also pay attention to the charm of poetry, and charm is particularly important, which is simply the backbone of poetry.

Some friends used "regularity" to evaluate the mistakes in my article, saying that the examples I gave were wrong. As I said in my article, I don't pay much attention to the smoothness and rhythm of poetry, and the poems I wrote were also written at random, and later I carved them into works with a little polish. But I think they are not bad. Even if they don't rhyme much, they don't pay much attention to leveling. Try to be objective and subjective, and don't just think that artistic conception is what your predecessor meant. Because poetry is abstract, everyone always looks at it differently.

Some people even doubt whether it is my original work, so I can only smile, because it is not important after all, and I will not answer.

I think the problem of poetry creation is not only a matter for scholars, but also a matter for each creator, which is closer to the creator himself. The creator of poetry is the true soul of poetry. What is the logic of letting outsiders point out what is important to them?

I love all innovative people, because they are leaders of the times, craftsmen who write history and creators of the times!

Innovative people are creative people, and history is more vivid because of them! Whether it's architecture, technology or culture.

Is that what everyone thinks?

Admittedly, the same is true of poetry, but the words are no different.

I am certainly not a creator myself, but I am willing to be their soil. As long as I can say a few words to the point, it will be beneficial to them. How happy I am.

When we write a poem, we must first grasp the content or artistic conception of the poem and achieve that meaning in vocabulary. This is the first thing. Then, when it is catchy and refreshing, it may naturally suppress rhyme and balance, which is more in line with it. When our ancestors wrote poetry, it was usually like this. Why do you insist on the premise of rhyme balance? It was not until later that people who studied poetry learned the law.

Yes, I can admit that my> article is a bit intense, but now I will. Because it is not intense, those who want to create ancient poems dare not write. Although many people haven't read my article, they may regard it as worthless in the future. But I think there are still a few people who have benefited a little from it, which may be beneficial to their creation, even if it is considered ridiculous by scholars.

I am willing to work with you to make some efforts for the culture of ancient poetry.