This scholar who advocates antiquity has no courage to bring it up. Occasionally, he will be persecuted by the rulers and confused about the secular vision. In fact, there was a carpenter in ancient times who had no chance to study and had similar thoughts. This man is Che Ping of Qi State. According to < < Zhuangzi. Paradise >> There is a record in the article: "Heng Gong studies after class, and the wheels are flat after class. He explained the chisel and then asked Heng Gong, "Do you dare to ask what you read? Gong said: the words of saints are also. Do saints care? The duke said, "I'm dead." He said: "However, you are a scholar, and the dregs of the ancients are husbands!" " However, his words are one-sided, and we should not deny all the so-called saints' words. and
The biographical history books from & gtTo & gt* * * are more like the history books concocted by the ruling class. It is increasingly clear that history itself is true, but under the protection of rights, it will become damp and stale with the passage of time. Therefore, it is the best policy to advocate [taking its essence and discarding its dross].
Laozi's macro theory: all-encompassing, let nature take its course; Micro-discussion: cultivate one's morality and cultivate one's nature. First, it is easy to read, which actually has a lot to do with everyone's life and living environment. Second, it is difficult to study. You should have life experience, cultural background and modesty in academic research, such as scholars and professors. Three: reading is more difficult: you should have life experience, cultural background, independence, concentration on research and telepathy. If you can succeed, you will get the road. But you can read and understand, but you can't read. Because there is a saying: ask questions and die! By the time he really goes to work, he may be dead. How can it be the best plan in the world? Don't Taoist priests who devote themselves to learning Taoism just read the living scriptures, but can feel at ease? Who can benefit the country or who can read the classics. ; & gt And> In fact, the effect is the same. & gt is more comprehensive, implicit and acceptable. It can be said that the second generation of> is more accurate and systematic. Therefore, we should advocate [taking the essence and discarding the dross] as the best way to read the Bible now.
So you have to read history or classics yourself, and you can't advocate it too much. Only when history is naturally integrated into the torrent of the public will the classics truly have their due status and vitality.