1. Correct reference mark.
What is said here is that at the end of the paper, four words of references occupy one line, and then the following items of various references you cited. Each reference has an obvious label, such as [number], (number) and so on. However, if this label is formal, it can be generated automatically or entered manually, and there can be no punctuation in brackets, such as [Num]. ], this is wrong.
The citation format should be correct, and the cited part must be marked, and marked in the reference part at the back of the paper, and the serial number is consistent with the serial number in the paper. In addition, the source of the quoted text should be strictly marked at the end of the formal paper, including the author, title, publishing house, year of publication, etc. Network articles should be marked with source network, and magazine articles should be marked with periodical number.
2. The quoted content cannot be too long.
Citation only uses a small number of opinions and arguments in other documents, and never quotes long paragraphs, otherwise it is plagiarism. A short answer, right? If you put the contents of other people's papers into your own papers in large chunks, can this be regarded as plagiarism?
3. If you want to quote literature in the middle of the paper, you need to mark the citation symbol.
Because of forgetting or being too lazy to mark, or using the wrong marking symbol, there are many paragraphs marked in red every year.
Use a period at the end of the quoted text. The content quoted is usually between double quotation marks, and double quotation marks end with a period, which is the correct way to quote. If a period is used in the middle of double quotation marks, the text after the period will be regarded as plagiarism.
4. Don't gild the lily.
Quoting other people's words, some people will gild the lily and add their own words directly, but I don't know if this will be judged as plagiarism.