Any art is a complex system, and its content can be vast and empty, and nothing can be accommodated; Its expression is colorful, unpredictable and unusable. The richness and characteristics of the resulting works of art will naturally be colorful and unique. Of course, the content of artistic expression and its way of expression match each other, and the method and process of artistic creation are inextricably linked with its results. Therefore, it is impossible and unrealistic to try to give a universal artistic evaluation standard.
It is precisely because of the richness and diversity of works of art that none of them can naturally suit everyone's taste. The perception of any artistic work is always closely related to its personal attitude towards life, cultural accomplishment, thinking habits, even moral quality and social ideology. What's more, it may be determined by his personal interest pursuit, or by his relationship with the producer of the work. Just as no sentence can make everyone feel relaxed and happy, the feeling of any language is closely related to his personal mentality at that time, his consistent thinking and personality, and more importantly, it may be determined by his personal purpose or his relationship with the speaker. Speaking is an art, and the principle is the same. Therefore, it is absolutely impossible to try to give a universal standard of artistic evaluation in detail and give a standard score to artistic works like marking papers in the college entrance examination. Therefore, Art Candidates's professional score is the worst.
Therefore, no matter whether it is art or not, no matter how crazy the so-called artists are, as long as their behavior can be accepted by the social elite, someone will immediately invent a set of theories to repeatedly justify this madness and make it legal and lofty (hence the "shit poem"), which is probably the "art evaluation standard" popular for some time.
Therefore, the so-called artists, in order to become famous and married, or with the help of power and potential, use circles and controllable media resources to flaunt themselves, so that art loses any basic feasible aesthetic standards, and the right to speak naturally becomes an unwarranted "professional evaluation." Isn't that ridiculous? As a result, today's calligraphy authorities mostly write ugly books or gobbledygook, today's painters and sculptors mostly draw ugly pictures or monsters, and today's poets are mostly talking nonsense or crazy! Are humans sick?
Second,
Any art will naturally have a most basic but not specific evaluation standard, which is nothing more than: beauty can impress people, meaning can communicate with the heart-that's all. Its concept of beauty has long been defined by Tao Te Ching as: "The beauty known by the world is beauty, but it is not beautiful."
Any work of art is a synthesis of various elements, and it has various connotations. It is impossible to perfectly express all the elements and aspects of a work of art! Everything is maintained by the law of unity of opposites. Anything with strengths will have shortcomings, and beauty may also have flaws. The so-called artistic vision is to be good at discovering and exploring one's own strengths without dwelling on one's own shortcomings. People always use this way to discover beauty, activate beauty, and thus reject or shield ugliness. Therefore, the core of art evaluation can only be to explore beauty, enlarge beauty and popularize beauty, and be tolerant of shortcomings, because shortcomings often have good intentions to pursue beauty, but they just can't do it. Besides, no one is perfect, how can we expect everyone to complete beautiful art? What art evaluation can't tolerate is blasphemy against beauty, let alone praise ugliness! After all, art exists for beauty, so people only want beautiful art and absolutely can't tolerate ugly erosion. This is the core, responsibility and obligation of art evaluation!
Incomplete and beautiful! Incompleteness is an injury to beauty and an irreparable loss to beauty. It's a pity, and it should be a pity. Therefore, it is a kind of harm and blasphemy to falsify openly, whether it is incomplete or just to cover up shortcomings. Can "manufacturing defects" also be popular in the art world? It just shows that brain damage has become an epidemic of this group, especially in the so-called "professional assessment". Therefore, any "professional evaluation" today is of no value, and it can only be used as a reference at most, to find yourself in comparison, test yourself and expand your artistic vision. In other words, except for some people who are eager to be famous, many "professional evaluations" are just tried to be imposed by the powerful people who have the right to speak, and will eventually become a joke of time.
Therefore, don't attach too much importance to the "professional evaluation" of "authoritative people". Most of what they say is just for self-expression, but it may be too misleading and make you a mess! Instead of listening to "professional evaluation", it is better to show your works to the old ladies selling vegetables on the street like Bai Juyi and ask their intuitive feelings. There is no need to talk nonsense about so-called artistic topics. Explaining the principles of art and studying the forms of expression of art are only the artists' own business, not those who look at art at all. You don't really need an art critic. They are just a bunch of hooligans who are idle. Show your work to others. When people don't like it, they should ask themselves, "Am I wrong?" ? Instead of "am I right"? Dare to correct your mistakes, instead of finding reasons for your shortcomings, because all the reasons you find can only deceive yourself!
Therefore, fellow travelers should also be cautious when studying and evaluating other people's works of art, and stop with suggestions. Whether the author listens or not is his own business, which is only related to his own artistic attainments. If you don't even understand the truth that "beauty known to the world is beauty", how can you play art? That's a waste of life!
Good poetry has nothing to do with flowery rhetoric, especially since no one will be interested in reading your poems in the dictionary. Out of courtesy, people should thank you for your work!
Third,
How to write your own poems well is actually not a very profound problem. The most basic bottom line is "poetry is true". If you don't really communicate with readers, you can't be moved without understanding.
Those "real" existence! Existence is "reality" and there is no need to be in its territory. When fictional territory can exist, even what can be imagined under established concepts (such as the myth of national identity) is also "reality".
Therefore, "truth" should be regarded as an echo of the feelings born of existence, otherwise those who have no feelings for life are purely false. For example, Cao Xueqin's poems are, of course, first-class good poems, and obviously the contents can't all be experienced by him, and most of them are fiction. Otherwise, it is impossible to create so many men and women with different tempers, personalities, destinies and talents, and to create poems with different styles. Therefore, if "reality" really wants to visit its territory, there will be no literature and art in the world, and the human brain doesn't need too many functions, so why bother with history?
"Falsity" is incompatible with the foundation of poetry creation, so it is naturally difficult to create good works, because in real scenes, it is still necessary to create situations and choose expression methods, and there is no art to speak frankly. In other words, the core of poetry art is actually the art of telling the truth! Let's take a look at the following well-known poem:
The mountains cover the day (when the weather is good, it is a real scene, so don't chew slowly, tell the truth).
And the ocean drains the golden river (naturally, you don't need to look at the Yellow River and the sea, let alone the upstairs, don't talk nonsense, tell the truth).
But you broaden your horizons by three hundred miles (a thousand miles is exaggerated, but it is feasible to practice, so there is no need to stay here. It is nothing more than an artistic expression of "wanting to see far")
By walking up a flight of stairs. Although this may not really see the Yellow River entering the sea, it may not really see farther, and it may even be "clouds cover the eyes", which does not hinder poetry. Don't say what you shouldn't say.
It can be seen that its modeling is a real scene, and more is the creation of an environment moved from other places. Not much nonsense, the environment is in place, and the meaning naturally comes. Because creation is inseparable from existence, it can also be transplanted from what you have seen and heard elsewhere and the feelings of other times (so-called "creation"), which will have far-reaching philosophy, connotation and situation, which also requires the author to be good at association.
Fourth,
Poets' works naturally need readers' approval. And I am the first reader, so I have to satisfy myself first, and then improve it to make readers like it. The so-called poetic situation, first of all, is the author's situation and thinking performance, which means that the author wants to tell readers his thinking feelings so that readers can feel the same, rather than let readers admire the author's literary talent! Without this, the situation would be impossible!
Poetry is different from ordinary writing, because it is catchy and directly refers to the artistic conception. The key to catchiness lies in the natural rhythm. The direct key to artistic conception lies in the purity and affinity of words. If you want to improve your creative level, you can recite idioms if you have nothing to do, and it will naturally flow smoothly. Idioms move with stories or situations. If you recite them more skillfully, the language will naturally not be confused. You can play tricks by reciting idioms, such as arranging the first word, the last word, or solitaire. In particular, different idioms can be used to express the scene of a thing (classified according to meaning, good at using substitute words, and tapping rhyme when writing poetry). You can also recite "Introduction to Melody" repeatedly, which can not only enrich vocabulary, but also get used to natural melody, and imperceptibly know what antithesis is and how to make couplets. In this way, you naturally learn to compare and use substitute words that communicate with your heart and communicate with arts and sciences, and get twice the result with half the effort.
Many people always think that reading temperament enlightenment is a child's business and they are embarrassed to read it. As a result, they have written crooked poems all their lives and are still complacent, but they don't know that people who read the introduction are really knowledgeable, because it is difficult to get started, and the fate after the introduction depends on what you do in the future. Don't think too highly of yourself, be less hypocritical and more true. This is the fundamental problem that China literati have to solve!
On the contrary, reciting a large number of ancient poems should be conducive to improving the level of poetry creation, but it should also be able to really communicate with the ancients! What's the use of flattering the ancients? Flattery itself is a problem. To make it clear, it is a dump, not a garbage station. Garbage stations are always dealing with garbage, including waste utilization, but the garbage in garbage dumps may be taken out to replace genuine products, which will destroy and pollute the environment again. Facts have proved that modern authoritative figures who have a deep study of poetry (at least read a lot of poems), such as Wang Guowei, Wang Li and the professors in Poetry Club, really can't write a few good poems, which are not as good as those occasionally written by academicians such as Hua and Wang Xuan (with personal ci collections). Especially those who specialize in artistic criticism and evaluation, no one can be artistic! This shows that memorizing a large number of poems is not necessarily good for personal artistic accomplishment, and it also directly proves that there are great problems in the methods, processes and theoretical achievements of experts studying poetry art! Probably their "theory" fooled them! Perhaps, the expert's "wealth theory" is only to make him a "knowledgeable expert", not to inherit and develop traditional culture and art! The theory divorced from reality is of no value to art, and it will only mislead culture and hurt art.
Therefore, when reading Tang poetry and Song poetry, you should read the classics, talk to the ancients in the classic works left by predecessors, and let the ancients teach you how to truly understand and do art through their classic works.
Five,
Modern people's language is inherited and developed on the basis of ancient people's language, which will naturally be more colorful than ancient people's language. However, the basic core, manifestation, rules, norms and principles of its application strictly abide by the basic norms of a * * * language system, and there is no possibility of conflict at all. In particular, the language expression of Tang poetry and Song poetry is no different from the basic language form of modern vernacular Chinese and the use of Chinese idioms. Poetry of Tang and Song Dynasties, in particular, is the basic element to express and express modern characters. Without these basic elements, there would be no wonderful words in the article. Naturally, there is no problem that the art of Tang poetry and Song poetry will be outdated. Only modern people have the responsibility to inherit and carry forward the art of Tang poetry and Song poetry.
The topic of how to carry forward Tang poetry and Song poetry is really huge. In fact, the most fundamental problem to be solved urgently is how to inherit the art of Tang poetry and Song poetry. Due to various reasons, including the misleading of various "research results", modern people basically don't know about Tang poetry and Song poetry, at least the Tang poetry and Song poetry written by modern people are extremely lacking in the linguistic features of tang style's Song rhyme and ancient rhyme. For example, the Tang people clearly said that the format of the law is changeable, while the Song people never said that the format of the Song Ci is immutable! Although modern people will prove some changes in the format of Song Ci through the comparison of works, they never ask why the format can be different in the same epigraph works they use for comparison. Who knows the principles and rules? Don't you just do whatever you want if the principles and rules remain unchanged? Then what format is this?
In fact, the variability and freedom of sentence patterns and syntax in Song Ci are great, and the invariable flatness and even format can not be covered. Therefore, there is no fixed format in Song Ci, and the lyrics written in flush format are only the patent of contemporary people, which has nothing to do with Song people, but it is a common feature of modern people's ignorance of the past. The reason why my Selected 300 Songs of Song Dynasty should be arranged in a sentence-by-sentence reading format is to let readers see at a glance that there are basically no masterpieces with the same epigrams! Therefore, we should study the art of Song Ci from the language form and rhythm characteristics in Song Ci works, rather than guessing the format of Song Ci from the layout and rhyme of Ci. This is not only a matter of methodology, but also the premise of "right and wrong"!
Song Ci is originally a language art. If we can't understand the basic problems of the language structure of Song Ci, we can't really inherit the art of Song Ci! What's more, the fallacy of "writing words by sound" is to shield the haze of the art of Song Ci. A lyricist closed the door to the art of Song Ci, especially the language art in it. The contemporary popular computer inspection format is even more puzzling! The reality is that no one who does algorithmic big data knows Tang poetry and Song poetry, but no one who claims to know Tang poetry and Song poetry knows algorithmic big data, or even the principle of big data! So where can the big data of computer test rules come from? Will it come from Qian Qian's Poems of Tang and Song Dynasties? Not to mention the algorithm, even such "big data" can have credibility? How can you believe the result of something without preconditions? Also, the computer search format itself hit the face of "filling words by sound"!
Therefore, it is the same sentence: talk to the ancients in the classic works of Tang poetry and Song poetry, let the ancients teach you how to do it through their classic works, and express and preserve the most beautiful poems and emotions with the simplest words. At least make your works more like Tang poetry and Song poetry! Don't force yourself to rewrite your satisfactory works just because the format of computer inspection can't pass the customs. Just don't publish these works for the time being. If you publish personal poems, you can find a publishing house with rich background. Most of them will only look at the quality level of their works and will not rely on computer to check the format and machine to check it.
With the development of science and technology, doctors have become machine doctors, literary editors have become machine editors, poets have become machine poets, and thinking is machine thinking. At this rate, does the human world still need people? Even if the human world is not extinct, what can be wonderful? It's terrible to think about it!
202 1.06.29 butterfly dance production