There is also a local chronicle in the history of Wu'an City and a Kangxi version of "Wu'an County Chronicle".
This annals contains eighteen volumes. The main editor is Huang Zhixiao and the main editor is Li Zhe.
The publication date of this journal was the 50th year of Kangxi reign (1711), at least the preface to the journal was signed in this year.
Currently, the engravings are stored in the National Library and the Henan Provincial Library, and the films are stored in the Shanghai Library.
In addition, there is another kind of "Wu'an Local Chronicles", not divided into volumes, compiled by Qian Xiangbao in the late Qing Dynasty, published in the 32nd year of Guangxu in the Qing Dynasty (1906), today in the Jilin University Library and Hubei The provincial library has a collection.
——The above information can be found on page 74 of the "United Catalog of Chinese Local Chronicles".
In addition, I would like to give another suggestion to the poster: when searching for historical information about Wu'an, you can also pay appropriate attention to the "Cizhou Chronicles" or "Zhangde Prefecture Chronicles" of the past dynasties.
Before the Ming Dynasty, Wu'an belonged to Cizhou, Hebei Province, and this ownership remained unchanged throughout the Ming Dynasty. In the fourth year of Yongzheng reign of the Qing Dynasty, Wu'an area was transferred to Zhangde Prefecture in Henan Province.
The compilation of local chronicles in various places was mainly concentrated after the Ming Dynasty, so in the "Cizhou Chronicles" compiled from the early Ming Dynasty to the early Yongzheng period of the Qing Dynasty, and the "Zhangdefu Chronicles" after Yongzheng in the Qing Dynasty, There will be some relevant historical materials about the Wu'an area. Especially in certain chronological periods recorded in the county annals, valuable information may still exist in the superior state annals and prefectural annals that govern the county.
For example, "Cizhou Chronicles", from the early Ming Dynasty to the Yongzheng period of the Qing Dynasty, there were four editions: Jiajing, Wanli, Kangxi 32nd year, and Kangxi 42nd year.
I hope you won’t be offended by my last few words.
You mentioned in your question that you have collected the Tianqi County Chronicle of Wu'an County. I am a little curious and a little confused about this.
It is said that the late Ming Dynasty Apocalypse version of "Wu'an County Chronicle" is no longer handed down today, and only a fragment of the Chongzhen version is handed down.
On the website of Guitu, it is specifically stated that this Chongzhen fragment is an additional engraving based on the Apocalypse version.
If what you have is indeed the Apocalypse version, it will naturally be a relatively significant discovery in the local documents of this city.
But there is another possibility, that is, the late Ming version you have is just the Chongzhen engraving.
In the history of the circulation of local chronicles, whenever a certain amount of additions are made to the content of the old chronicles to form a new county chronicle, it should generally be called a new version.
In the seventh volume of the Chongzhen fragmentary version of the National Map, starting from page 15, under Zuo Shijun, two people, Zhang Zuanzu and Zhang Zuanzu, who lived in the first year of Chongzhen, appeared (see the picture above) ).
We know that records compiled during the Tianqi period cannot contain records from the Chongzhen period. This proves that this version must be a work by Chongzhen or after Chongzhen.
Judging from the engraving workmanship of the book version, this is not a supplementary engraving on the old version of Tianqi, but a new set of book plates engraved during the Chongzhen period.
If the county annals you have in hand are from this edition, it is recommended that you refer to the edition of the national map in the future and regard it as the Chongzhen edition. Maybe this is more rigorous. It doesn't take you much time to add a sentence to the original poster ten days after answering the question and click "accept", at least much less than the time it takes me to help you find information.
Do you think so?