Are people who are too emotional really poor?

This sentence is not only correct, but has been verified by countless people for thousands of years. There is a proverb of our ancestors that says so? Righteousness does not take charge of soldiers, and righteousness does not take charge of money? , it fully illustrates this truth. People who do charity should not let him master money, because money can't stay in these people's hands all the time, which also reflects from the side that the more good people on the moral level, the less money they make. Because of original capital? The first bucket of gold? All bloody, like in game theory? Zero sum game? The money earned by those rich people in the early days was plundered and squeezed from the poor. One person's wealth must be at the expense of the wealth of thousands of people. People who are too emotional can't make a lot of money, because they are not heartless.

Today, with the improvement of labor law, it is hard to imagine what kind of life British workers lived 300 years ago. On the one hand, it is the extravagant scene of the factory owner, and on the other hand, it is the miserable situation of the ragged workers. In order to complete the transformation from an agricultural society to an industrial society, Britain developed vigorously at that time? Enclosure movement? Drive countless farmers to the factories in the city to work day and night. I thought life would be better without hoes and straw hats, but they overestimated the kindness of capitalists. The cycle of salary reduction, cost reduction and scale expansion is so repeated that these capitalists want to drain every drop of blood and sweat of the workers. Although Britain finally took the lead in completing the accumulation of primitive capital, there are countless bones of poor people under it.

Seeing this, do you think these capitalists have a so-called moral bottom line? And how can a person who values feelings do such an inhuman thing? Imagine if a person works 10 hours a day and feels very hard, so he comes to you and asks for a raise. Do you agree as the boss? If you are soft-hearted, you will lose your own interests, but if you promise him, a second and third person will jump out, so you will raise the salary of everyone in the factory. But because of this operation, you lost a lot of money and even disrupted the plan to open a branch factory. When faced with this situation, truly cruel capitalists will not only raise their wages, but also increase everyone's working hours to 12 hours. Because they know that workers are just cheap labor and can be replaced anywhere, but these people may have problems eating when they leave the factory, so capitalists test the physical limits of working people step by step without fear. From here we can see the difference between having a bottom line and not having a bottom line. If you want to make money, you must oppress or even squeeze others at the expense of others' interests, which has broken through the moral shackles of being an ordinary person and eventually become the object of everyone's spit? Capitalist? .

Those who are soft-hearted, sentimental and unwilling to sacrifice others to achieve their goals will eventually become poor. This is not because they lack business sense, but because they do not harm others and benefit themselves in the face of opportunities to make money, and insist on the simple idea of getting rich through labor, which is also the reason why they are easily used and trampled. Everyone abides by the rules and the bottom line, so what about the only one? Foul? People actually have a huge advantage. After their success, they will turn back and scold these poor people for being inflexible. It is really the sorrow of the times.