Anyone who dares to write a true history of the Ming Dynasty was killed by Kangxi. How much did the Qing Dynasty tamper with?

First, Zhu Yuanzhang's bloodbath hero was scolded, Emperor Zheng De was scolded for inaction, and Emperor Wanli was scolded for not going to court for 30 years. So is this really the case? Will there be a suspicion of being exaggerated, and someone will deliberately guide future generations to scold?

Second, at the end of the Ming Dynasty, peasant rebels rose everywhere. Thirteen representatives of leaders, including Zhang, Li Zicheng, Luo Rucai and He Yilong, carried the aura of "justice" all the way, and seemed to have sufficient reasons to carve up Daming Mountain. The uniqueness of these characters highlights the decadent darkness of the Ming court.

With these two questions, we go back to the early years of Qing Dynasty, when the royal family of Aisingiorro compiled history books for Zhujiajian. When you understand the tragedy and tragedy that happened at that time, you will get the answer to the question.

Before that, let's popularize several outstanding features of the compilation of historical books in the Qing Dynasty.

First, the Ming history was finalized by the Manchu emperor from beginning to end. In other words, every sentence in the Ming Dynasty was censored by the rulers of the Qing Dynasty. As long as the content is beneficial to the Qing Dynasty, it is not as important as the historical facts.

Secondly, the independence of historians in compiling history was completely lost in Qing Dynasty. Under the premise of being loyal to the historical materials left over from the previous dynasties, the historians of the Qing Dynasty are highly original, while the historians of the Qing Dynasty are not. The source of their history books is the emperor, and they obey the pleaser, not the history.

Thirdly, after compiling the History of Ming Dynasty, Manchu destroyed a lot of historical materials of Ming Dynasty. This is the most irritating and distressing thing. Arguably, what you made up didn't get in your way. Why did you destroy it? Obviously, in order not to let future generations find that the two books are too far apart, they can only choose to destroy one of them.

Well, that's the only way in Manchu history! Not only that, the Manchu dynasty not only strictly limited its own standards of compiling history, but also prohibited private compiling history. However, it is often these books from people in an open environment that are the real history.

Although the Qing dynasty explicitly prohibited this matter, there are still many literati who are willing to respect history. For such people, the practice of rulers or dictators is: kill!

One of the most famous cases is Zhuang Tingyi's Ming history case. The case happened in the Kangxi Dynasty, because Zhuang Tingyi bought the manuscript of Ming History from Zhu Guozhen, a scholar in the former Ming Dynasty, so he gathered a group of scholars to start editing. Unexpectedly, when Emperor Kangxi learned about it, he ordered the killing of these people.

The scope of this case is unprecedented. Because not only the people who compiled books were killed and hacked, but also those who prefaced, proofread, printed, sold books and even bought books were punished one by one. Some of them have been buried, and all of them have been dug up and unloaded 36 pieces.

There are countless such murders, most of which occurred in the Kangxi Dynasty. As long as people write a real history of the Ming Dynasty, the ending is very tragic. Therefore, we can draw a conclusion that the Qing Dynasty may indeed have tampered with a lot of history, and as for the truth that has been deeply concealed, I am afraid it will remain under the wheel forever.