Why are all references marked in red when using dimensional measurement?

If the format of your references is correct, the system will automatically identify and exclude those references that do not participate in text double checking. If the quotation is marked in red, it means that your format is wrong. The system will compare your references as text and check them again.

In the case of paperpass, VIP, turnitin and other systems, the detection step is to "paste the full-text content on the web page", and the references in the report show that this situation appears repeatedly and can hardly be changed. You can recognize it ... or you can change the order of references, such as exchanging [1] and [2] documents and [3] and [4] documents. There is a chance to escape duplicate checking, but the disadvantage of doing so is that it does not correspond to the original quotation, but to be honest ... no one cares whether it corresponds ... If it is HowNet, it is completely avoidable to mark the references in red. Because HowNet detection is to upload the whole document, HowNet system will recognize the format, and repeated references can only prove that your format is wrong!

Let's make a preliminary self-examination by posting the setting method of the network circulating everywhere first.

1. has obvious "reference" mark, and the four words of reference are in one line. The following are all reference items;

2. Each reference has an obvious label, which can be any of the following: Num, [Num], (num);

3. Labels can be automatically generated by Word or handwritten;

4. Don't punctuate the label, such as don't [Num]. ] or (Num,), etc.

5. It is best to have time information or URL or bibliography information in each reference;

6. There should be no manual line break or carriage return in a reference and at the end of this reference (that is, let nature take its course, and the line break will be automatic after a whole line, so please don't be artificial! )

Well, it's a good summary, but the picture above is repeated. What happened? Because there is no mention of some more important hidden rules:

1. Format the word "reference" as a title.

2. All punctuation marks must be in English format, for example. () []. The title ""can basically be deleted directly.

3. Don't appear year, month and day, just delete it. For example, 2065438+May 2005 changed to? 20 15.05

4. The order of literature content should be correct. Correct format: [1] Zhang Qinghong, He Fangqing. Motor vehicle insurance [M]. Beijing: Machinery Industry Press, 2016,65. There is a comma between the author and the author, and the author is the period at the back of the column. Remember that it is an English punctuation mark!

Secondly, reference article title → article type → periodical/publishing house → publication year → page number (periodical demand), in which the article types are periodical [J], book [M] and master's thesis [D].

Of course, HowNet only cares about whether your format is correct, and it is not smart enough to recognize whether you have marked J/M/D or author/theme or other details. To achieve the above, 99.9% of the references are not repeated. This article, "What should I do if references are marked red when checking duplicate on HowNet", is summarized by academics. Only for those students whose references are still marked red after being written according to some appraisal standards of HowNet detection system. I hope it will be helpful to the students, and you can try to summarize more. The author is not responsible for all the problems in the process of reference practice and continues to explore. .....