In short, complex problems. Let's start with the simplest. What is this? People? And then what? Everyone will say: it takes two hands to make a sound? People? . What is that? Become? And then what? Shout short and shout long? Become? Not many people can say that. This is the answer that modern China education can give us.
If we let our great-grandparents answer, the answer may not be like this. If you are a scholar or study in a private school, you may answer based on Shuo Wen Jie Zi: Man, the most expensive nature of heaven and earth, such as brothers and sisters; When you enter, you enter the door.
Many of us are adults. With what? Become? There is almost no difference between writers and writers, which is not a problem under the traditional education in the past. What is Chinese studies? What is culture? This is Chinese studies, this is culture, and it is the most basic, called? Elementary school? . The two most common words reflect the people-oriented tradition of China people. It's not easy. Taylor, the father of western management, still uses workers as machines. China people have been paying attention to contingency since ancient times, and a hundred schools of thought have their own complete theory. How many years has the western contingency theory been put forward?
Let's talk about simplified characters again. Complexity and simplicity have always been parallel, and the six countries of Qin and Tong adopted seal script, but grass-roots officials rarely used it. In fact, it was not promoted successfully, and the emerging official script occupied the main position. But official script is only an improvement of writing rules, and it doesn't need arc processing like seal script. So in the early Han Dynasty, all intellectuals knew the Warring States script, but in the Eastern Han Dynasty, they would not, because they could only write official script. Therefore, Sima Qian was able to compile historical records, and the Warring States Policy edited by Liu Xiang still has many typos and sentences that are difficult to train. Therefore, at that time, Xu Shen wrote Shuo Wen Jie Zi, which communicated the connection between Han Li and Qian Shu Qin Wen, including inscriptions on bronze and stone.
We're even worse now. Many people can't understand the traditional vertical script, let alone know the official script, small seal script, big seal script, bronze inscription and Oracle Bone Inscriptions, and understand their cultural contents. Now simplified characters can only be mastered by rote memorization; Traditional Chinese characters seem complicated, but they are actually composed of parts. The sound, meaning and form can be understood at a glance, so ancient books can basically be understood. Those who are good at this way are good at exegesis, and when they read it, they will know that an ancient book has typos. Compatriots in Hongkong, Taiwan Province Province and overseas have not found it inconvenient to write traditional Chinese characters. This is a matter of habit. Nowadays, many simplified characters are synonymous with typos, vulgar characters and nonstandard characters in the era of traditional Chinese characters. The essence and meaning of words have been lost, and too many of them are made by rough people in the lettering workshop? Invention? . Why were the second batch of simplified characters abolished and reduced to typos? Simplification is to simplify, but in fact it is a national subjugation, which has aroused the anger of conscientious scholars!
Who can I learn from? Country? See the meaning of the word? From where? Country? In words, we know: there is a mouth, the country is also; Someone, with a field, is home; Hold on tight. Don't attribute the success of literacy in New China to the implementation of simplified characters. That is the result of a large number of literacy classes, literacy classes, evening classes and universal primary and secondary education. It should be pointed out that traditional Chinese characters were still used for literacy at that time. The implementation of simplified characters has caused a great fault in China culture, and the excesses outweigh the merits, so we don't accept the discussion here. It is too early for those who strongly oppose ancient prose to say anything about it.
Fortunately, ancient Chinese characters have never been abolished in China, and the context has been continuous since ancient times and has never been cut off. Since ancient times, too many elites have always attached importance to cultural heritage, ancient books research and collation, and ancient archaeology in China. They guard the roots and spiritual home of the Chinese nation. Please pay tribute to them!