What's even funnier is that once they are criticized, they use the word "art", boasting that their calligraphy is "art" and calling their critics people who don't understand "art". The word "art" has become their shield, but their "calligraphy" has nothing to do with the elegance and exquisiteness of art. It is really strange that their behavior can still be respected by the people.
It is not clear in a few words, but can only be judged by the three views of specific individuals. There is always a difference between nutrition and garbage. Natural selection, causal continuity, unity of opposites, in the final analysis.
Survival of the fittest, against the fate of elimination.
As a veritable calligraphy teacher (professor), you must have a deep foundation, and you must get out of the old posts, that is, you must have the theory of Bofeng. There should also be writing methods and skills, and there should be a complete set of teaching questions in the teaching process. What can we do without these requirements?
Because calligraphy is not a brush stroke, it is a unique skill that is extremely difficult to write and has been mastered by only a few people since ancient times.
Therefore, although some people write correctly and beautifully, some people write indulgently and strangely, some people have taught them and some people have supervised them, it is not convincing if they can't write a calligraphy art with exquisite brushwork, which can reflect the artistic conception of harmony between man and nature and reach the level of ancient calligraphers.
Calligraphy can be solved not by seniority, business opportunities, promotion and appointment, but by elegant brushwork. The result of Mr. Nanguo's boasting can only be notorious.
Why do you feel that the calligraphy professor is always questioned? Calligraphy is an art, and art has value and significance only if it is liked and recognized by the broad masses of the people. In order to improve their popularity, gain more attention and show their high level, some calligraphy professors deliberately create and write some cobweb calligraphy, which no one can understand except himself. Is calligraphy that no one can understand recognized? Is there no difference between calligraphy and bird's nest calligraphy? These obsessed so-called calligraphy professors tried to sow the dragon seeds, but they got fleas.
Because calligraphy is a special art, there is no universal standard. If you ask for a standard, there will be no flowers blooming, and if you do whatever you want, there will be praise such as ugly books, so the professor will be wrong when he talks.
In fact, many artistic developments in the world are like this.
Instead of being respected, these people will be cast aside. The reason is very simple-their "calligraphy" is only suitable for their own play, and they can't lead China's calligraphy, let alone China's culture.
There are three reasons for this:
First, the embodiment of social values.
Second, in ancient times, few people became calligraphers through systematic teaching by teachers.
Third, calligraphy did not exist in ancient times, so this new thing rose later. Lu Xun said: we should look at new things with a critical eye.
Systematic subversion and destruction of calligraphy, like this professor, will you recognize and respect it?