1.
Many times, for those of us who write or write books, we are responsible. What responsibility? As writers, we have a responsibility to spread the truth to the world. If what you wrote is wrong, or "fallacies", I think it can't stand the test of time.
Over time, people will spit on you and forget you. Because what you said is wrong and absurd, and it is "a false propaganda when you don't know the truth."
This statement is not worthy of recognition. However, he is a little confused. Sometimes people who are eager to seek the truth, or those who are interested in learning but can't learn the law, are easily confused and intimidated by this fallacy and embark on a different path. The result is getting farther and farther away from the truth.
That's obsession, that's unwise, that's easily manipulated zombies and fools who follow suit in unison.
That kind of person is either numb or overzealous. Does anyone say it's better to be overzealous? Actually, it is not. Numbness and overreaction are the same, both heartless, lacking independence and dialectical thinking.
This kind of person is naturally undesirable.
2.
On the other hand, we writers have a characteristic that most of us can think independently and are full of personal ideas, which is good, but here we will also distinguish between three levels and highlands.
The so-called: seeing words like faces, judging by high and judging by low, is actually what I said.
In the eyes of people who understand, reading a person's article is equivalent to reading a person's face. At present, we can judge what level this person is and what level. The so-called master's mistakes are often just a moment, and he always knows what level he is. When he meets someone who is better than himself, he will only bow or praise. Those who clamor for "A competition" are people who have no idea about their own level.
In other words, there is no music.
The more masters you are, the deeper your understanding and cognition of yourself and the world will be, so the so-called dialogue between masters is actually "a little thorough". Because both sides are knowledgeable enough, sometimes a word, a sentence or even an action can make the other side understand the meaning, which is a unique way of communication between people who have a thorough understanding of the world.
3.
So for the strong, the real confrontation between the strong is not "sweating" and "fighting" as most people think. That's not true. That's ordinary people. Bitches on the street call names and fight. The confrontation between masters is often "one eye". When I look at you, I will give up. No need to compare. If you don't understand this, it proves that you have a bigger gap with each other.
4.
Of course, when I say "duel" here, I don't just mean "Wushu" competition. We always talk about dueling, as if it must be "martial arts", but it is not.
If strike is regarded as a kind of "martial arts", it is too restrictive. The so-called "martial arts" is not limited to martial arts, but also includes all walks of life in this society and various literary and sports events.
"Master" is everywhere, but it is by no means limited to "martial arts". Absolutely not.
5.
Let me give you a small example here. Because I like writing, I will talk about things in our "literary line". It is said that when Mr. Qi Gong first saw Mr. Lin Sanzhi's calligraphy, he took off his hat and bowed respectfully. You know, this is not seeing someone you respect, but just seeing the work.
This is what I said: "See the words like a face, talk about the low with the high", "It's needless to say that the masters fight each other". At first glance, you know "you are better than me" or "you are very good", which also proves that this person is a "very understanding" person and he is also a very good person. It's just that every extremely powerful person knows that there are people outside, so when we see people who are stronger than ourselves or very powerful, or their works, our "hat off" is actually: "I get it" and "I'm not bad".
Because people who don't understand won't make such a move, they are too understanding and considerate.
And the person who makes such a move proves that he is not weak. Because of that "glance", you don't know how much effort and practice it is.
6.
What is this "glance"? This glance is thorough. See through the problem, to put it bluntly: transparency at all.
7.
This is very important. Mencius once gave an example: "Living in the mountains is different from those savages in the mountains." And when he hears a kind word and sees a good thing, if he decides the river, he can't resist it. "What do you mean? When Shun Di lived in the deep mountains, he lived next to wood and stones and interacted with deer and pigs. He is no different from the savage in the mountains; Hearing a good word and seeing a good thing is like a river breaking its banks, and nothing can stop it.
Another example is what we said: the sixth ancestor of Zen Buddhism, that is, the famous poet: "Nothing, where is the dust?" Master Huineng, the sixth ancestor.
It is said that six groups of Huineng Zen masters were a woodcutter in the mountains when they were young, and later went down the mountain to exchange money. They had to sell firewood.
Then I overheard someone chanting the Diamond Sutra. When I heard: "live with your heart if you don't live", our six-group Zen master was certainly not the sixth ancestor of Zen at that time. At that time, the fifth ancestor Hongren was still alive, and the sixth ancestor was not even his disciple.
But it is precisely because of this sentence that Mr. Lu, the woodcutter (the common name of the six ancestors) resolutely gave up his firewood cutting career and entrusted his mother to the surrounding villagers (the mainstream view is that he and his mother live in a single-parent family, but some people say that his parents died when he was young, so he chose the former here) and devoted himself to becoming a monk. Later, in the familiar "Poetry Competition", we won the title of forbearance.
8.
Shun Di and Zen master Huineng, the sixth ancestor, are both saints I admire. They are all great, but we can also find their similarities from these two examples. Their similarity is that they were all humble when they were young, and they didn't even seem to reach the average level at that time. Shun Di was a savage when he was young. No matter which generation he lived in, the "woodcutter" was not upper class or even middle class. It doesn't seem to be what we thought. Many of us now think that if people want to "go up", do they have to have a stable job, or a relatively solid family background and respected social status? Is this the price of "upward"?
But let's look at the great men who live in our hearts and shine among the stars in the universe. Which one is "middle class or even above"? Confucius is a single-parent family, Mencius is a single-parent family, the sixth ancestor Huineng is a single-parent family, and Shun Di was even a savage when he was young ... Isn't it incredible? It's the opposite of what we think of as success, isn't it?
But it's a fact. It's a historical fact.
9.
What do I want to illustrate by giving these two examples? Let's first look at how Zhu Xi commented on Mencius' remarks. Zhu Xi said: "It is completely natural to cover the heart of a saint. As soon as you feel it, you should be quick, and nothing makes sense ... "What do you mean? Zhu probably means: "saints are naturally easy to see through." That's what it means.
If we regard "infiltration" as a result and "a little infiltration" as a victory, there is a difference between what we can do to win before reaching this "infiltration" result.
10.
"Penetration" is an insight into the truth, that is, a high degree of understanding of oneself and the world. It is not easy, but it is also important.
It is good that people can live transparently. I think this is the victory of life.
1 1.
Especially for us writers and knowledge disseminators who spread the truth, we must be "transparent". Because we are opaque, we are still confused. Then what qualifications do we have or why should we let others know us, understand us and even learn from us?
Who are we to tell others?
What can he do?
So, writer, I don't know anyone else; Anyway, the requirements I set for myself must be thorough Of course, some people write some fallacies and greatly appreciate them, while others make money by writing "fallacies and heresies". There are not many comments here. This is the world. What can we do?
12.
How to achieve this goal, or what methods and means we can use to achieve this goal of victory, is everyone's problem. If this thing "from virtual to bright, from natural to perfect" is compared to reality, then I can clearly tell you that everyone has this truth in their hearts, that is, everyone can be transparent. Just a "saint". He was born a saint, so it must be him, so it is obvious that he "smells a good word and sees a good thing." This is his genius. In today's words, he is the kind of person who "tells another story from one story". His talent and understanding are extremely high, which is the basic quality of a saint.
But some are not, there are many; For example, Confucius himself admitted that he was "born knowing", that is, he admitted that there were people who were "born knowing". Personally, I think (I knew it from birth) that he was a man like Shun Di, but Confucius admitted that he was not.
What did Confucius say? Confucius said, "I was not born to know, I like the past, and I am eager to seek it" (The Analects of Confucius Shuer). Confucius said that I gained knowledge through continuous learning. The implication is that I haven't heard such a good word as Dashun: "Decide the river, it's irresistible." No. I learned the truth through continuous learning, in other words: I learned the truth through continuous learning.
As we all know, Confucius must be alive and transparent. He sees things accurately and speaks objectively.
This is enough to prove that he is a "know" person.
This is very important.
Because of Confucius' knowledge, we have a direction to go forward. Of course, this is another story.
13.
If the truth in people's hearts is compared to a light sphere, which is bright and shining, then many of us are covered with a layer of fog outside this sphere, but the fog of a sage is particularly thin, and he can "smell a kind word and see a good deed" (which can be expressed by "root" and "wisdom root" in Buddhism), while we ordinary people. He may laugh at you, at your uselessness, and at your nervousness. Can't talk.
Of course, it's normal. It's totally normal.
14.
In other words, what is it? The fog wrapped in the luminous body in such a person's heart is probably so thick that it feels like 7: 00 or 8: 00 in the winter night in Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei in 20 16. Even you know, some people even think that such people have no light in their hearts. In fact, I said no, he did, but his "fog" was too thick, reaching the level of pollution and terror.
This has become a public hazard, and this kind of public hazard has actually been quite numerous in past dynasties.
The collective wisdom of the masses has always been worrying. This situation has lasted for thousands of years in China, and it has become a dull and helpless problem that people of insight have to face, and sometimes they even want to escape.
15.
Some "people of insight" have simply become hermits, while others are still struggling, hoping to "beat China people", some hiding in the street, and some hiding in the DPRK. But in essence, as long as they don't go into the mountains, they are a little "at a loss". Confucius traveled around the world.
16.
In other words, this is the pillar in our hearts and an example of our behavior.
17.
A model, how did the old man Kong "clear the fog"? Personally, I think his old man's word is "learning", which is Kong Old Master Q's means to clear the fog, and it is also one of the ways and means that many of us choose to clear the fog now. The "luminous body" in Kong Old Master Q's heart is foggy, but his old man keeps learning, and by learning "duang", "duang" and "duang", he can break the layers of fog ... and finally he can see "light".
I finally know.
18.
So basically, I think Confucius is "thoroughly learned".
19.
Of course, if the means to clear the fog is limited to "learning", then this matter is small. "Learning" is just a means, just one of Qian Qian's 10,000 ways to clear the fog, but he is by no means the only means. It's just that Confucius likes learning, so he uses it, so from another angle, we all have to stick to our hobbies. Some people like boxing, and you can also use boxing to clear the fog. No problem. If you love racing, you can also use racing to clear the fog. No problem ... and so on. All roads lead to Rome and all roads lead to the same goal. As long as you don't do the opposite, you can basically achieve it as long as you follow your true inner pursuit.
20.
So what is the sign of "transparency"? How to test yourself thoroughly? In fact, this matter is very simple. Our general inspection method is basically "a little" or "a glance".
Sometimes you "learn" to a certain extent, or practice to a certain extent, then the masters only need to "know a little" to know each other's level, just like I said, "seeing words like faces", reading one person's article is enough, and so is the confrontation between masters. A glance is enough, which is also "thorough".
Just like Qigong takes off his hat and bows when he sees Lin Sanzhi's words, this is called "head". Of course, they follow the path of calligraphy, and we follow the path of writing. In fact, the reason is the same. You are a good thing, really good, so there will always be people who understand, and there will always be people who understand; You don't even need to broadcast your own "good" with a megaphone. People who understand will naturally understand.
Just as both Qi Gong and Lin Sanzhi are lovers of calligraphy, there are many lovers of calligraphy, so it is easy to distinguish between "good" and "bad".
Although "literature is not the first" means that there is no "one hundred points", "95 points" and "30 points" are still easy to distinguish.
People who know this naturally understand.
2 1.
So don't be afraid, this world is like this; Some things are "30 points", but they are very profitable; There are many such examples. I won't list them one by one.
22.
But you don't have to worry about being inferior to him (30 points). Another criterion of "transparency" is not paying much attention to these. Of course, you have to eat, get dressed and spend money. But if you take that "30 points" thing, I really don't want to go anyway.
But that doesn't mean others won't go.
Because not everyone in Tou is a good person.
So I said a word, and I said, "Those who are not afraid of' passing' will do nothing, but those who are afraid of' passing' will play their best!" If a person who knows the truth is "bad", it is almost invincible.
But who knows?
Everyone has his own life, and the cause and effect are not empty; That's it.
23.
So here is a more important question: "Do you want to be clear?" .
We have had examples of "thorough" people, and that was at the level of "a glance" or "a little". Let's have a look. Minko is waiting on the side, and he is as good as it is; Lutz, as it is; You Ran, Zigong, Kan Kan Dairy. Qi Le. "If it is right, it will not die." (Advanced Analects of Confucius, 11th) This description is a rare way of "environment description" plus "form description" plus "language description" in The Analects of Confucius, which roughly means that Min Zikai stands beside Confucius and looks like a harmonious and docile person. Lutz, a strong look; You Ran, Zigong, is generous and happy. Confucius was very happy.
He said, "I'm afraid I won't die like Zhong You."
This is what Confucius said, and it is included in Advanced Eleven. We can imagine this scene. Everyone is with Confucius, and Confucius is very happy. If he is happy, he must be looking at everyone, looking at their respective looks and mental states. Confucius was very happy and then said: Lutz will die a natural death.
24.
If we are ordinary people today, we may not be able to accept it; You will think of a person who smiles and tells you that "you will die of natural causes", so can't you fight? Who can stand this?
But this is not ordinary people. Confucius is a saint. Can a saint be so "out of line"
Confucius knows "courtesy" best and won't talk nonsense.
There must be a reason why he said that. He just glanced at everyone and said, "You will die of natural causes". This is what I call a glance.
What is this?
This is the "head". Confucius spoke too thoroughly.
25.
This is Confucius' "seeing through at a glance".
Mencius, the kind Yasheng Meng, also made a similar "death prediction".
Let's take a look at what Mencius said: the basin is an official in Qi, and Mencius said, "When you die, the basin is an official!" " When the basin was surrounded by killing, the master asked, "How did the master know that he was going to kill?" He said, "He is a bit talented. If he doesn't know the way of a gentleman, he will kill him." Meng really deserves to be called "the sage of Asia", and "it is small and talented, and it is enough to kill him if he hears the Tao but doesn't hear it." From this point alone, combined with Mencius' comprehensive judgment and analysis of domestic politics and diplomacy, it is certain that he knew that the state of Qi would die if the basin was full of officials. This is Mencius' "transparency" and Mencius' "a little transparency".
26.
We can see that Confucius and Mencius have a thorough and accurate view of people and things, which is actually a proof that a person is "transparent" in life. As long as "a glance" and "a little" can answer the question correctly, accurately, sharply and truly, we young scholars are amazed.
It is true that Confucius and Mencius, in the present words, are essentially objective and sharp people; In other words, it can often "hit the nail on the head", but it is also unacceptable and unpopular for many people in modern times.
27
Especially for us writers who are "determined to learn", it is even more difficult; Like I said, I can't see through it, I dare not write; I see through it, and I don't know if I can say it.
28.
This has formed a paradox, and really formed a realm of "I don't know if I should say something".
29.
But what I said is not what most people want to say. I said your humanity, I said your truth; But this is often fiercely resisted by the other party, as if I were a sinner who labeled and defined it. Really helpless.
Of course I know that people are like this. Of course I know that people don't look at their own problems. Of course I know that everyone thinks they are the best people in the world. Of course I know this.
Bai Qikeng killed 400,000 Zhao troops. When the king of Qin wanted to put him to death, he also sighed, "What crime have I committed? As for this end? " (Laughter)
Therefore, from this perspective, people are all the same, perfect people in their own eyes, and there is no room for slander and slander.
30.
So sometimes I am "confused". Should I make it clear, or should I just let nature take its course and stand by? Sometimes, when my well-meaning suggestions can't be understood by the people I care about, my heart hurts, but I suddenly feel that this is understandable. As the saying goes, "caring is chaos", I don't always care about anyone, but I feel a little sad that people I think are close to don't understand me.
Maybe it's my arrogance.
3 1.
So whenever I encounter difficulties, I will learn from the sages and see what they say and do; There is a very good saying in Mencius with all his heart, which says: "Wei Shi can't speak with words, but he is also based on words;" It is self-evident, so it is not obvious, but everyone wears clothes and the like. " What does this "perforation" mean? "The Analects of Confucius Yang Huo XVII" said: Confucius said: "The color is fierce and the infighting is fierce. Are you still a thief? " Those who are tough on the outside and weak on the inside are compared with villains, just like thieves digging holes in the wall, right? The implication is that a bully is always a coward, and a thief who digs the wall is a villain.
Confucius used this metaphor, and Mencius also used it in his own works. He said this: he said that scholars can't talk to each other, but they seek each other's interests with words; Being able to talk without talking is to test each other with silence for the benefit. These are behaviors similar to "dressing up".
It's hard. It's just too hard.
According to Mencius' words, we can measure our own words, that is, silence is also guilty, and silence is waiting for an opportunity to test each other; This is also an act of "gossiping", but when it is time to speak out, the other party has no "tolerance" to accept. I will pay attention to the ways and means, but in the end I will fall on that "point". I said a lot and let him think for himself. What's the difference between that and not saying anything? So why don't you stay alone? Therefore, it is generally better not to look at people and do your own thing; I've seen too much. I've seen through it. "Say or not" is a worry; It is wrong to say it, and it is wrong not to say it. So don't look. Caring is confusing, so try not to care; But how is that possible? Therefore, in this world, "transparent people" also have their own pains, that is, between saying and not saying, between caring and not being moved; What did you say?/Sorry?
So be yourself. "Difficult to be confused" is good, but difficult to be confused is not "impenetrable", no.
32.
The rare confusion is "I don't want to see clearly". -Wen Li Zongqi (pen name Qiu Shui) Ding Younian October 18th night.