Found an automatic synthesis generator.

Generally speaking, a thing is favored in the market because it can meet the needs of some people. A junior high school student used the software of "automatically generating" composition downloaded from the website to "write" a composition in only 4 minutes, and actually got a high score of 90 points. The Chinese teacher praised him for his fluent language and good basic skills. It can be seen that the software is very helpful for students to complete the composition topic assigned by the teacher, at least to meet their needs to cope with the teacher's eyes. The question is, is a composition excellent as long as it can cope with the teacher and blindfold the teacher? In other words, what kind of correct way should students learn to write? What do students want to learn when writing a composition? What is the purpose of their composition practice in Chinese class?

Obviously, if writing a composition is only to complete the homework assigned by the teacher, and only to improve the writing skills and get ideal scores in various current exams, then students can "write" the composition through "automatically generating" composition software, borrow some words or paragraphs from the popular Complete Works of Composition and Selected Model Essays, or "take" them directly from famous articles and classmates' compositions for my use. Some Chinese teachers are deeply uneasy about the software of "automatically generating" compositions, and feel that "in the long run, it is not conducive to the development of students' thinking and the expression of true feelings" and "learning that violates the laws of education will certainly not be effective"; However, some teachers may not feel so uneasy, because some of them intentionally or unintentionally focus on the single purpose of improving students' writing skills and getting good grades in exams. New methods and products, such as "automatically generating" composition software, help students "write" compositions, which is also equivalent to helping these teachers teach compositions. It has been reported in the media that teachers teach students to recite model essays in advance for exams, and it is inferred that individual teachers will not be worried or shocked by the "automatically generated" composition software, but will probably spare no effort to coach and promote them among students. ...

On the contrary, if we correct the thinking of composition teaching, we can't just regard composition as a tool for taking an exam, and we can't regard students' composition as a purely technical or expressive text training. Instead, we should go beyond taking an exam on the basis of taking an exam (as long as there is an exam, taking an exam is a realistic goal and it is impossible to completely cancel it), so that students can "be a man first, then write a composition" and run through aesthetic education and thinking development education in composition teaching. While guiding students' composition, we should pay attention to developing students' curiosity, imagination, unique understanding and universal conscience, cultivate students' abilities of imitation, comprehensive analysis, investigation and research, independent thinking and critical innovation, and guide students to truly express themselves through composition, accurately understand and grasp the world, so as to closely combine it with students' growth and success. There is no doubt that something like "automatically generating" composition software can only be regarded as a misunderstanding.