Which is more beautiful, traditional Chinese characters or simplified Chinese characters?

Some CPPCC members even put forward a proposal to restore traditional Chinese characters, which fully embodies the unrealistic style of patting meat eaters on the head. Mr. Ding Qizhen, who specializes in language and writing, has painstakingly written many articles to prove that it is unnecessary to restore traditional Chinese characters. His recent article "Criticism on the Main Arguments of Restoring Traditional Chinese Characters" refuted the main arguments of "complex sects" one by one, which was well founded. On the contrary, the common "complex sects" on the Internet often fail to produce any strong evidence except sensational. There is a "traditional Chinese character school" view that "traditional Chinese characters are more beautiful and artistic than simplified Chinese characters". Teacher Ding takes the word "zhi" in Wang Xizhi's Preface to the Lanting Pavilion as an example to show that words with few strokes can be written beautifully and artistically. In fact, those who think that "traditional Chinese characters are more beautiful and artistic than simplified Chinese characters" ignore one reason, that is, those beautiful and artistic calligraphy works handed down from generation to generation were originally written by people who wrote traditional Chinese characters; However, there are very few people writing with a brush in modern times, so the probability of works comparable to ancient calligraphy appearing in simplified Chinese characters is definitely not high, not to mention that modern calligraphers also started from ancient posts, so it is normal for beautiful traditional Chinese characters to appear in their works. Some people will say, didn't you say that traditional Chinese characters are easy to write beautifully after a long time? Yes, but there is one premise, that is, in the field of calligraphy art, and if a calligrapher specializes in simplified Chinese characters, it is not necessarily impossible to produce good simplified Chinese calligraphy works. Calligraphers are a minority after all. Which is easier for us ordinary people to write, traditional Chinese characters or simplified Chinese characters? Let emergency doctors try to write traditional Chinese characters. It is estimated that more patients will complain and scold doctors for their poor handwriting and inability to read prescriptions. Is the CPPCC Committee responsible for this? For China people, the language and writing of the motherland are beautiful. At this point, there is no difference between traditional Chinese characters and simplified Chinese characters. However, in order not to increase the burden on the people of China, Councillor CPPCC should stop making trouble.