How can we become as open-minded and elegant as Liang Wendao?

On your question, sincerely talk about some personal views:

Let's put aside Xiong Liang and talk about him later:

1. Get the most valuable information-

First of all, get rid of the word "most", because if you want to build your knowledge system perfectly, it is like maintaining an ecosystem. There is a law in biology: if there are no non-dominant species, the top dominant species will perish. From this point of view, we should read widely and then specialize; Moreover, I personally noticed that we received the same information at different times and in different degrees. For example, I began to learn calligraphy at the age of six, and it has been more than ten years since I was twelve. At the age of eighteen, I felt that cursive script had unparalleled aesthetic feeling, and the acceptance of aesthetic value was moving forward step by step. It is impossible to say that I could see the beauty of calligraphy and grass when I was six years old.

So I suggest you calm down and do more things you can at present, such as some favorite reading. As for reading methods, such as reading quickly, reading aloud, taking notes and summarizing, these are just methods. If you have a correct attitude, you will get twice the result with half the effort.

2. Do your own thing-it's still a matter of accumulation. People often say that "a jar of water pours out a pulp", but sometimes it is useless to read a lot of books. What if I don't know the ideas put forward by others? There is also the case that "ten cylinders of water can't pour a drop"; This needs exercise. Personally, I suggest that you keep a diary, use your own language and opinions, and sort out your perspective and thinking-this is the most effective, and it may not be so easy at first, but you must stick to it, write it every day, and set a certain length every day-don't spend too much time chatting with others, and do more thoughtful discussions or self-analysis.

Let's talk about Liang Wendao again. His natural and unpretentious speech is the most lovely. Let's analyze his internal characteristics-

1. Grassroots Wisdom-Didn't Xue Yong have a book called Grassroots is the Mainstream? When Liang Wendao explained those books to us, his views were very grassroots and solid. For example, he read Zen on a program a few months ago. Speaking of the monks calling the Woods where tigers haunt a good place to practice, he immediately smiled and said, "But this should be said by survivors." There is also an example quoted by Lifeguard when asking the question of "crossing yourself"-watching that program, I remembered many things in my previous life and kept thinking. Some people read too many books and are divorced from life, but they are not very smart; A person can't always "stand", sometimes he still "squats" to see the world.

By the way, Qiu Zhenhai, another host of Phoenix TV, is typical of this type, but he has his own advantages.

2. Kindness and gentleness-needless to say, my heart is hard, and no matter how I pretend, my words are cold. Look at "Tripe and His Pit" and compare Wen Dao with Wen Tao. They are completely different. Soft-hearted people don't talk casually, always take care of others' feelings and generally don't catch up with others. They will be a little slow, but they are not.

3. Beyond the secular-this is not contrary to the "grassroots". In the secular world, many things are closely related to vital interests; However, if a person says what he says and posts comments that are almost blocked on the Internet, will he be out of breath when listening to such people? From this perspective, the realm of "forgetting me" is that everything is reflected and reflected, and it will stand out for a long time.

4. Imperfect-this is what I added for "anti-worship" Mr. Liang. In his work, he still pays attention to the key points, grasps the essence of things clearly and makes it clear, but he doesn't pay much attention to details. For example, he still pronounced "Xiao's fourth voice" as "Joe's image", and his English pronunciation was inaccurate.