Innovation is different from the previous works on the basis of inheriting the previous calligraphy. Has your handwriting reached the level of your previous soles? Talking about innovation without foundation is done by the hooligans of the book association. It is better to be down to earth!
Calligraphy is a category different from other arts. Tian Yingzhang's calligraphy has not been recognized by most calligraphy celebrities. Everyone is singing the same opera every day, and everyone can basically answer who sings well with one voice. There is no such strange phenomenon in opera as denying Tian Yingzhang's regular script. Therefore, if you want to convince everyone of calligraphy, you should not make superficial examples, but dig and interpret between the lines. Everyone agrees that your interpretation makes sense. You are an expert!
First of all, I declare that I am a layman, but I also have some opinions on calligraphy works. Words are for people to see, even weeds have certain rules, and weeds are not scribbled. Second; Words reflect works, and it is meaningless to talk about fonts without works. Third; Everyone's aesthetic standards are different, and calligraphers are artificially determined. For example, which calligrapher does Mao's font favor? Because there is no trace to follow, so someone gave one? Overlord body? Fourth; Whether you are a calligrapher or not depends mostly on the social status of the writer. It is a fact that a farmer can't be a calligrapher even if he writes all his life.
There are many people who write better than calligraphers because they are not calligraphers! This kind of thinking is prejudice and contempt for oneself. I think the fonts of most calligraphers are not standardized, because calligraphers acquiesce in each other, and there is also a kind of ignorance and blind worship. No matter how well you write, you are not a calligrapher, a calligrapher bragging or someone holding it around. I think, no matter how good the words are, they are all the same. I have seen many works. The worse the calligrapher is, the more he makes an issue of it. He is incompetent!
In addition to the original note-taking function, Chinese characters also have a regular beauty. How to change from ancient times to the present, but the beauty of rules has never changed. The beauty of this rule lies in its basic rule and aesthetic feeling. Aesthetic feeling is artistic feeling. At present, most calligraphers in the Book Association don't know what the real beauty of rules is. There is nothing about beauty in the rules. Any art needs to pay attention to the beauty of rules The beauty of rules is the essence of art, of course, art should also pay attention to the beauty of personality. Personality is reflected in being a single author, right? Three views? Got it. And then what? Three views? It also belongs to the category of philosophy. Therefore, a good calligraphy work must be a work with aesthetic feeling (beautiful brushwork and beautiful structure) under the guidance of correct philosophy.
Most people think that neat words are good words, which are good and enough. Perhaps such a word is not called calligraphy in the eyes of experts, but I think it is closer to the masses and life, and it is easier to inherit and popularize. Ordinary people can't understand it, but experts think it's calligraphy, because without the masses, it can only be circulated on a small scale, which has become a self-entertainment for a small number of people. The feeling is pretentious and inscrutable, just like the ancient eight-part essay, which can only be mastered by intellectuals and is obscure. Ordinary people can't write it or understand it, so it was eventually eliminated.
Maybe I really don't understand calligraphy. Calligraphy is an art, but it is difficult to understand. It's the same as the doctor's prescription. I can't see beauty. I think writing regular script is enough. In order to better inherit calligraphy, calligraphers strive to create some works that are easily accepted by ordinary people.
Literati are bullying each other. Many folk calligraphy lovers write well and are deeply loved by the masses. But when it comes to some judges, the result of comments is either Jianghu or art. I like calligraphy, too, but I only write my favorite words. Let others think what they think. I don't write to please others. The so-called eyes of the masses are discerning, and the masses also know words and beauty and ugliness.
Although there is no standard answer to beauty and ugliness, there is always a steelyard in my heart. This steelyard is based on habitual cognition and empirical judgment of ugliness and beauty. Calligraphy mainly depends on the topic, not the quality of writing. Famous painters and calligraphers say that the bigger the topic, the more valuable it is. It is a reality that big names have to be recognized if they are not recognized. For example, A and B are both calligraphers, which depends on who is famous. There may be situations in which both parties are dissatisfied with each other. For example, Kang Sheng despises Guo Moruo's calligraphy, let alone the general public.