Does printing photos of buildings (such as schools) on postcards infringe the copyright of school buildings?

(ten) copying, painting, photography and video recording of works of art set up or displayed in outdoor public places; ..... the Supreme People's Court's Interpretation on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Laws in the Trial of Copyright Civil Disputes Article 18 The works of art in outdoor public places as stipulated in Item (10) of Article 22 of the Copyright Law refer to sculptures, paintings, calligraphy and other works of art set up or displayed in outdoor public places. A person who copies, paints, photographs or videos a work of art specified in the preceding paragraph may reuse its achievements in a reasonable way and within a reasonable scope, and it does not constitute infringement. 1. Buildings (such as schools) can become architectural works if they are original. If there is no right, there is no need to discuss the issue of infringement. 2. Artistic works in outdoor public places mentioned in Item (10) of Article 22 (Fair Use) of the Copyright Law, including architectural works. 3. Combining with Article 22 of the Copyright Law and relevant judicial interpretations, shooting architectural works and reusing the results (photos or photographic works) in a reasonable way and scope does not constitute infringement. 4. Printing the plane copy of architectural works (photos or photographic works) on postcards, even for profit, is "reuse in a reasonable way and scope". The reason is that the use of this plane mode is not the main way for the author of architectural works to obtain economic benefits, which neither affects the normal use of works nor harms the legitimate interests of copyright owners.