Take the fact that only the weak will hold a group. Is it only the weak who hold the group? Put aside the humanistic ideas of other countries for the time being. Let's talk about our country's views on marriage and mate selection. Do you really think this is a joke? Why do rich people and extended families choose families with similar family conditions when choosing spouses for their children?
Why do those powerful enterprises and companies rarely choose those with no strength, no funds and no value to cooperate with? Therefore, this sentence itself is a mistake. The weak group becomes the strong, and the strong group monopolizes the world. The weak in others' eyes are giants with indomitable spirit in your eyes. The strong in your eyes may be stronger, and it will be destroyed with one finger.
Let's talk about the loneliness of the strong again. In the last article, I mentioned "stand out from the crowd". In fact, there is an idiom called "chickens tell ducks". When you become a strong man, when you rely on your own luck and ability to become a strong man, you find that everything around you is not like you. You define yourself as a strong person. When you are in this environment, you will think that others are weak, and you will think that they are not qualified to be friends or partners with you, then of course you are lonely.
Therefore, the loneliness of the strong is because of themselves, and the weakness of the weak is related to their own abilities, but the bigger reason is because of comparison, which is the most deadly. The reason why the weak hold a group is to survive and to make themselves stronger. This is the fundamental difference between the two.