Is it good to help the poor and relocate in rural areas?

It can be said that moving can be done or not, and moving has advantages and disadvantages: advantages: 1. Under the framework of relocation policy, immigrants have received financial support from the government in land, housing, community infrastructure construction and employment, which is based on poverty alleviation rather than ecological compensation. However, most of the original land, homestead and mountain forests have been transformed into ecological utilization to provide ecological services.

Two. It protects the ecological environment of the relocation area, strengthens the local poverty alleviation and development, reduces the population of the relocation area, relieves the pressure of the population on the land, relieves the contradiction between man and land, improves the land carrying capacity, protects the environment of ecologically fragile areas, and realizes a virtuous circle of population, resources and environment.

Three. The living environment of the relocated people has been improved, and their income level and comprehensive quality have been improved. Relocation not only effectively improves the living environment and development environment of the demolished people, but also enhances their sustainable development ability. The relocated population has changed from the traditional development mode of agriculture and planting to the modern development mode of part-time or even multi-format operation.

Four. Accelerate the pace of new rural construction in relocated communities, improve the level of local public services, improve the infrastructure construction of relocated communities, and lay a good foundation for community development; The level of social security is constantly improving, including not only the acquisition of the poor. The minimum living security also encourages people to actively participate in urban and rural social insurance.

Disadvantages: one. Due to the lack of employment opportunities in the new environment, some relocated residents have once again fallen into poverty. Two. There are fewer and fewer wasteland available for resettlement, and it is more and more difficult for a large number of residents to resettle in different places. The land area and homestead area are relatively small, and the agricultural benefits are relatively low. In addition, the agricultural production conditions of immigrants are relatively poor. Through land resettlement, that is, providing housing and cultivated land, an agricultural village can be replicated in a new place to help immigrants get rid of it. Poverty is becoming more and more difficult. Some resettlement areas are also ecologically fragile areas. After a large number of people settle down and engage in agricultural production, it may lead to ecological degradation in the resettlement area.

Three. Non-agricultural employment in ecologically fragile poverty-stricken areas is more attractive to the poor. Many farmers combine relocation with immigration. They hope to move to a place closer to the city, with better infrastructure, more convenient public services and more convenient non-agricultural employment.

Four. Many immigrants will not settle down after resettlement, some will choose new places to settle down, and some may return to their original places. After the immigrants moved out, their houses and land were either sold to spontaneous immigrants in an unplanned way or left vacant.