East Road, West Road, South Road, Wulipu, Qilipu, Shilipu, they are looking forward to more difficult days step by step. Thorns spread, dense forests cover the sky, apes howl and wolves howl, and insects bite snakes and are not afraid to give in. Bloom is warm in spring, hot in summer, bleak in autumn wind and biting in winter. They always walk in a hurry. The peak turns, the road turns to the peak, but there are still countless mountains, countless waters and countless difficulties. Long-term fatigue and running around make the four people pale and emaciated.
Ten degrees in the Spring and Autumn Period, they went through hardships before they saw a small fishing village. It's small, but compared with their precarious life, it's safe to eat and wear. "Everyone" hesitated. "It's too difficult to find fairy fruit. It's up to you! " Everyone played a trick. "Maybe anyone can find it, maybe someone can find it, or maybe no one can find it." Everyone decided to stay in the fishing village and wait patiently.
"Anyone", "someone" and "nobody" are all on their way again with hope. They bid farewell to the warm fishing village, crossed the barren wilderness, crossed the hot and humid jungle and crossed the snow-capped mountains. The cold wind tore their clothes to pieces, and the wolf's howl made it difficult for them to sleep. Hungry crocodiles lurk in the river ahead. Hydra greedily sucks their blood. Pulling it out is a column of blood, and they can't find a decent piece of skin all over. They travel day and night, unwilling to stop and rest, and their eyes are shining with hope.
It was ten years before they saw a meadow covered with green grass. As the sun sets, chickens live on the shelves and cattle and sheep are everywhere. This is finally stable and orderly compared with their hungry and restless lives. Someone decided to stay. "It's too difficult to find fairy fruit. Look at you. " Someone's eyes are dim. "Anyone can find it, and it's not bad for someone. Maybe no one can find it. " Someone decided to stay at the ranch and wait patiently.
"Anyone" and "Anyone" packed their bags and set off again. Along the way, rivers are criss-crossing, bridges are in disrepair, and rapids are like arrows. If fierce wave rushes, surrounded by mountains, all cold trees block out the sun, which is extremely steep. "There are no birds in a hundred mountains, but there are no footprints in a thousand roads", and "anyone" and "anyone" help each other, encourage each other, and make every step hard. Years of carving knives have worn away their youthful frivolity and carved vicissitudes on their foreheads and corners of their eyes. "Anyone" and "Anyone" are getting old.
Ten years later, they came to a bustling city, with cars coming and going, full of excitement. After all, this is the last place people can live on their way to Guo Xian. It is the limit of human existence and the limit that "anyone" can imagine. "Anyone" is holding the hand of "anyone", hesitating and hesitating. "We are also bumpy in North Korea and bumpy at night. Time flies, both body and mind are wasted. I am afraid that I am afraid of the ideals of the past. Today I am in Conan! "
"Nobody" knew that the last companion had given up, so he gently withdrew his hand. "I know it will be more difficult for people with weak hearing and amblyopia to move forward, but I can feel it with my heart and have no regrets." "No one" resolutely went on the road, and a crutch was his tool to cut off difficulties. "Anyone" looked at "Anyone" sadly, and there were a little tears of shame under his eyes.
Nobody walks in the wilderness, walks through the jungle, climbs snow-capped mountains and swims across rivers. The thick cocoon of "nobody" rubbed against the previous rock; "No one" fell down countless times and got up countless times; The blood scab on "Nobody" has fallen again and again; "No one" challenged the limit again and again and survived. He walked, crawled, struggled and groped without stopping for a minute.
Twenty years later, the hair, eyebrows and beard of the "nobody" are as white as gray snow-capped mountains, which looks like the long journey he has been pursuing for fifty years.
Finally, one day, "nobody" set foot on a flat land. His hands and face were old and he lost consciousness. Only one heart was still beating tenaciously. Is it here? "Nobody" can't see or hear clearly, he can only feel carefully. A drop of turbid old tears crawled over the gully on his face and fell to the ground. A miracle happened! "Nobody" seems to feel the bud of life. Smell the fragrance of leaves, flowers and fruits. He laboriously picked a soft fruit and took a bite, which was crisp and sweet. Just after eating, he clearly saw rows of fruit trees, red flowers and green grass, and all the fruits nodded and smiled at him; The breeze blows gently, and he hears the laughter of leaves and the singing of birds! When taking pictures by the stream, he was surprised to find that his white hair turned black, his face was ruddy and his skin was youthful pink! No one kissed the earth gratefully. Nobody is not greedy, but he is walking home with three fruits in his arms.
He is as light as a fly and as fast as a fly. He passed by cities, pastures and fishing villages, and visited "anyone", "someone" and "everyone" respectively, but they were all white-haired. They don't believe that this energetic young man is the "nobody" who was with them at the beginning. No one gave them fruit. When "anyone" gets well and "someone" sees the light again, it is difficult to draw a conclusion whether "everyone" has become smart. It's a pity that they are still white-haired. Perhaps, only by picking and tasting fresh fairy fruits in person can we have the greatest harvest!
The three men looked at each other. Do they regret their persistence or their dependence on others? How sorry they are!
In fact, the "everyone" in front of us is our brain, which is smart and inevitably inert; "Someone" is our ears, and it is inevitable that it will be biased to consider only one aspect; "Anyone" is our eyes, but the reality is superficial and far-sighted; "No one" represents a firm and persistent heart, even at the last moment of life, never give up easily; Fairy fruit is our constant pursuit of hope.
People are a whole, so is society. It is very fragile to rely only on some of them. Everyone often places their hopes on someone. Although anyone can do it, no one can. So "when no one does what anyone can do, everyone is complaining about someone."
Think about it, everything is fine!
**********************************************************************
Personnel management is the most complicated thing in project management, because people themselves are so complicated and changeable that different strategies and methods are needed to deal with different people. Moreover, its feedback is not necessarily direct and timely, and sometimes there will be unspeakable and unclear embarrassment, and its effect is almost impossible to quantify. Facing the subtle interpersonal relationship in the project, how to manage and solve the personnel conflict? This is a topic that different people have different opinions. I don't have any "universal" wisdom to offer, but there are some practical cases that I can use with you.
As the beginning of a series of topic discussions, this paper only lists one theme: "There is only one leader".
There is only one leader. What does this sentence mean? "You and Unique" is a word used to describe the necessary and sufficient relationship in mathematics. According to its mathematical meaning, it can be explained that this sentence has two meanings:
1 The project must have a leader;
2 A project can only have one person in charge;
First of all, let's talk about "the project must have leadership".
Although we speculate in books such as team building and project management, the project quality is the responsibility of the whole project team; Team software process (TSP) is to promote a team operation mode similar to the three powers in the United States. In this mode, everyone assumes part of the project responsibility. However, in the present situation, I think the following fable can illustrate the practical problem very well.
There are so many people in every company, one is called "everyone", the other is called "some people", the other is called "someone" and the other is called "nobody". One day, the boss gave the "boss" a piece of information and asked him to tidy it up as required before going to work tomorrow. The "master" promises no problem. When the boss left, the "boss" flipped through the information, put it on the table and left. Seeing this situation, "someone" thought that the boss would definitely want it tomorrow, so he stayed, finished his work seriously and finally left. The next day, "some people" went to the office and saw the sorted information. There is no doubt that a beautiful and kind "snail girl" appeared the night before and happily took her to the boss to find a job. The boss patted him on the shoulder appreciatively and praised his commendable work attitude. "Someone" looked and said nothing.
The second time, it was like this again.
The third time ┅┅
Finally, once, "someone" couldn't stand it, and left work like "everyone", leaving only "no one" to do these jobs.
This fable clearly shows that "everyone is responsible, that is, no one is responsible." This truth is so easy to understand in China, and it is deeply imprinted with the characteristics of China. As Mr. Eco, the former president of Bertelsmann Asia, said: "China has adapted to the imperial rule for thousands of years, but it is not used to the modern western management concepts. It is best for someone to have the final say and everyone will follow suit. " This is the sorrow of China people, but this is the status quo.
We need a "leader" to be responsible for the success or failure of the project. His interest is closely related to the achievement of this project. A higher-level manager can understand and control the development of the project only by grasping this person. This method is more suitable for the needs of China companies in terms of management cost and actual operation, so it still has its market and vitality. As for this leader, it is divided according to functional groups, and the group leaders are responsible for each other and for this leader; Whether to adopt "democratic centralism" has become an internal matter of the project.
Secondly, a leader is enough for a project.
Generally speaking, a project is in the charge of one person. However, there are many cases: in addition to the manager appointed by the superior, there is also a spiritual leader in the project, and the latter must be a person who has made outstanding contributions to the project in order to have such a position. However, this is like Britain's "shadow cabinet". Is the former broad-minded enough, and does the latter know how to respect the arrangement of the company? If one party acts carelessly, this obvious balance can easily slide to extremes quickly, leading to personnel conflicts. Once there are signs of contradictions, it is necessary for the superior to mediate and solve them in time. My suggestion is that the superior should reconsider the person in charge of the project: either ask the spiritual leader to leave, or ask the superior to change the appointment and correct the candidate. Of course, the project will be impacted and the team will be shaken for a while, but the consequences of not doing so are also very serious, which requires careful decision-making by superiors.
Occasionally, I will encounter another kind of "two leaders" situation. It's not a "shadow cabinet", but a compromise of the superior in some consideration, perhaps in personnel management. A project has a technical supervisor and a management supervisor, just like a two-headed snake. Nominally, the two are "division of labor and cooperation", and each has its own emphasis on specific matters. In fact, however, this is not only cooperation, but also "balance of power". Does a project need such a complicated decision-making model? Personally, I don't think it is necessary in most cases. It is inevitable that there will be various deviations in the team, and it is normal for the two leaders to have different attitudes. If both sides are restrained and wise enough, the project can operate smoothly. However, it may be unintentional to "the tree wants to be quiet, but it does not rule out that individuals create troubles for their own purposes and provoke disputes between the two sides in order to obtain personal interests. In this case, can the project progress? China people are good at "fighting with others". For example, the above-mentioned projects eventually led to open confrontation between the two sides at the regular meeting of the project; Its superiors also failed to publicly mediate in time; In the recent assessment, one party was completely excellent. The development after this can be imagined, and the situation can only be described as irreversible.
This kind of "two-headed snake" is relatively rare compared with "Shadow Pavilion". If you have such an idea, my suggestion is to give up. Some lessons don't have to be tried by yourself, do you?
There are big and small projects, but the reason is the same. As long as a leader ensures clear responsibilities, many hidden dangers can be avoided and the project can get off to a good start if it breaks down.
Personnel management is the most complicated thing in project management, because people themselves are so complicated and changeable that different strategies and methods are needed to deal with different people. Moreover, its feedback is not necessarily direct and timely, and sometimes there will be unspeakable and unclear embarrassment, and its effect is almost impossible to quantify. Facing the subtle interpersonal relationship in the project, how to manage and solve the personnel conflict? This is a topic that different people have different opinions. I don't have any "universal" wisdom to offer, but there are some practical cases that I can use with you.
As the beginning of a series of topic discussions, this paper only lists one theme: "There is only one leader".
There is only one leader. What does this sentence mean? "You and Unique" is a word used to describe the necessary and sufficient relationship in mathematics. According to its mathematical meaning, it can be explained that this sentence has two meanings:
1 The project must have a leader;
2 A project can only have one person in charge;
First of all, let's talk about "the project must have leadership".
Although we speculate in books such as team building and project management, the project quality is the responsibility of the whole project team; Team software process (TSP) is to promote a team operation mode similar to the three powers in the United States. In this mode, everyone assumes part of the project responsibility. However, in the present situation, I think the following fable can illustrate the practical problem very well.
There are so many people in every company, one is called "everyone", the other is called "some people", the other is called "someone" and the other is called "nobody". One day, the boss gave the "boss" a piece of information and asked him to tidy it up as required before going to work tomorrow. The "master" promises no problem. When the boss left, the "boss" flipped through the information, put it on the table and left. Seeing this situation, "someone" thought that the boss would definitely want it tomorrow, so he stayed, finished his work seriously and finally left. The next day, "some people" went to the office and saw the sorted information. There is no doubt that a beautiful and kind "snail girl" appeared the night before and happily took her to the boss to find a job. The boss patted him on the shoulder appreciatively and praised his commendable work attitude. "Someone" looked and said nothing.
The second time, it was like this again.
The third time ┅┅
Finally, once, "someone" couldn't stand it, and left work like "everyone", leaving only "no one" to do these jobs.
This fable clearly shows that "everyone is responsible, that is, no one is responsible." This truth is so easy to understand in China, and it is deeply imprinted with the characteristics of China. As Mr. Eco, the former president of Bertelsmann Asia, said: "China has adapted to the imperial rule for thousands of years, but it is not used to the modern western management concepts. It is best for someone to have the final say and everyone will follow suit. " This is the sorrow of China people, but this is the status quo.
We need a "leader" to be responsible for the success or failure of the project. His interest is closely related to the achievement of this project. A higher-level manager can understand and control the development of the project only by grasping this person. This method is more suitable for the needs of China companies in terms of management cost and actual operation, so it still has its market and vitality. As for this leader, it is divided according to functional groups, and the group leaders are responsible for each other and for this leader; Whether to adopt "democratic centralism" has become an internal matter of the project.
Secondly, a leader is enough for a project.
Generally speaking, a project is in the charge of one person. However, there are many cases: in addition to the manager appointed by the superior, there is also a spiritual leader in the project, and the latter must be a person who has made outstanding contributions to the project in order to have such a position. However, this is like Britain's "shadow cabinet". Is the former broad-minded enough, and does the latter know how to respect the arrangement of the company? If one party acts carelessly, this obvious balance can easily slide to extremes quickly, leading to personnel conflicts. Once there are signs of contradictions, it is necessary for the superior to mediate and solve them in time. My suggestion is that the superior should reconsider the person in charge of the project: either ask the spiritual leader to leave, or ask the superior to change the appointment and correct the candidate. Of course, the project will be impacted and the team will be shaken for a while, but the consequences of not doing so are also very serious, which requires careful decision-making by superiors.
Occasionally, I will encounter another kind of "two leaders" situation. It's not a "shadow cabinet", but a compromise of the superior in some consideration, perhaps in personnel management. A project has a technical supervisor and a management supervisor, just like a two-headed snake. Nominally, the two are "division of labor and cooperation", and each has its own emphasis on specific matters. In fact, however, this is not only cooperation, but also "balance of power". Does a project need such a complicated decision-making model? Personally, I don't think it is necessary in most cases. It is inevitable that there will be various deviations in the team, and it is normal for the two leaders to have different attitudes. If both sides are restrained and wise enough, the project can operate smoothly. However, it may be unintentional to "the tree wants to be quiet, but it does not rule out that individuals create troubles for their own purposes and provoke disputes between the two sides in order to obtain personal interests. In this case, can the project progress? China people are good at "fighting with others". For example, the above-mentioned projects eventually led to open confrontation between the two sides at the regular meeting of the project; Its superiors also failed to publicly mediate in time; In the recent assessment, one party was completely excellent. The development after this can be imagined, and the situation can only be described as irreversible.
This kind of "two-headed snake" is relatively rare compared with "Shadow Pavilion". If you have such an idea, my suggestion is to give up. Some lessons don't have to be tried by yourself, do you?
There are big and small projects, but the reason is the same. As long as a leader ensures clear responsibilities, many hidden dangers can be avoided and the project can get off to a good start if it breaks down.