Our argument is opposite: successful works should not be remake, help to sum it up! It would be great if we could provide more material for the debate!

1 remake the classic (success) is actually a different medicine. Isn't this a waste of money? It is better to invest money in innovation! Moreover, classics are classics, and a new group of people are playing. Still a classic? 3. When the new actors perform this old play, they all imitate the older generation of the team and have no own style. In this way, they are not only imitating their acting skills, but also acting badly, fearing the dangerous consequences of learning to walk in Handan and losing themselves. Even if you imitate it, people won't look at the object you imitate. Why do they want to see you? This remake won't go far.

I didn't check the information carefully, just say something.

1. Since it has been successful, why should it be icing on the cake? This part of time and energy can better promote the development of the whole industry by focusing on other aspects.

2. The remake of a successful work is no different from the old wine in a new bottle. Film and television works are not calligraphy and need not be copied. We advocate learning from innovation and oppose plagiarism.

3 remake is disrespectful to the original in a sense, after all, there are still some discrepancies.

The third point, casually said, seems a bit untenable. Just by the way, just have a look.

I think if I were positive, I would say:

1. The reason for the remake is that the successful works are out of date, or there is a certain breakthrough in the current environment and conditions.

It is precisely because of the success of the book that it should be made into a film and television work for more people to contact.

So I think the word success is one of the keys. First of all, the remake of film and television works is precisely because it is a failure relative to a specific state. For example, the six-year version of Journey to the West is now obviously a failure of special effects; Infernal Affairs series in the West is not as strong as the East because of cultural differences, so there is a so-called successful remake. Secondly, how to calculate the success is to achieve certain economic benefits, become a classic calculation, cause strong social repercussions, or change with the changes of conditions?

And remake the book into a movie. I didn't come up with a strong rebuttal myself at the moment. . . This is meaningless. .

(Reasons for supporting the remake: 1, which is needed for mass entertainment. 2. The need of cultural innovation. 3, business needs.

Reasons against remake: 1, protecting traditional culture. 2. Protect traditional memory and protect history and culture. 3. Break away from the original work. ) This paragraph in brackets was picked online.

Just as the remake of the four classic novels was not very successful, the remake of Titanic and Jinyong series was relatively successful. Examples of both sides are easy to find.

PS: 1。 Successful works are not limited to film and television, but also literary works such as novels made into films and television. The original is a classic, and he created another classic after remake, but he can't surpass the classic of the original. But he changed the taste of the original and brought only visual effects. The pursuit of money and business. . . . . . You can also pay close attention to film and television to defend, but you must not ignore literary works such as novels. This is the most important thing and you must not miss it.

We can discuss whether successful works should be remake from the perspective of protecting the classic original culture.