If the reproduction of artistic works is a concept of copyright law, it can almost be compared with reproduction. China's copyright law once regarded plagiarism as a way of reproduction. As a copy painting, although there is almost no visual difference from the original, copy is different from mechanical copy, but manual copy, so copy painting can sometimes be regarded as a deductive work of the original painting.
If a copied painting is marked as a copy, it is only copying, but selling the copied painting as a genuine product is a forgery or a fake, which is not only illegal copying, but also a fake author. But a copied painting is not marked as copying, and the copyist claims to be the author of the painting, which is plagiarism or plagiarism.
In the right generation stage, although the copyright in our country adopts the principle of automatic acquisition, that is, the copyright is generated from the date of creation, in order to better safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of the original creator, it is suggested that the original creator register the copyright with the relevant departments. This is helpful to solve copyright disputes caused by copyright ownership and provide preliminary evidence for solving copyright disputes.
In the stage of rights protection, the original creator can take self-help relief for the infringement of his private rights, that is, he can reconcile with the infringer privately, or he can take public relief according to the provisions of Article 47 of the Copyright Law, that is, he can take legal measures to require the infringer to bear civil responsibilities such as stopping the infringement, eliminating the influence, making an apology and compensating for losses.
Commercial creation of an original work without the permission of the copyright owner does constitute infringement. Of course, the premise is that the copyright owner does not disclose the copyright.
If you don't copy the original, you don't directly modify the original, but learn as a reference, which does not constitute infringement, but an ordinary learning behavior. In this regard, we can refer to the personal rights and property rights of copyright. Of course, it is completely infringement to directly put the unpublished photo P in the background.
The borrowing of scenes, characters, lines, actions, etc. Actually entered another category and was created by the same person. It is feasible to create with the permission of the copyright owner, otherwise there will not be many fan products. The same is true of' playing with stalks' in the original work, but there are certain restrictions.