The reason why Huang Hongfa fell out of favor. There are only two personal writings about the clues to the answer.
First, during the Yongzheng period, Xiao recorded in Yong Xian Lu that in the forty-seventh year of Kangxi, Andrew, the thirteenth son of the emperor, "fell out of favor because of the abolition of the East Palace". Forty-eight years ago, in Kangxi, because of his young age, the prince under the emperor's nine sons had not been given the title. Huang Hongfa's so-called "knife problem" is inconsistent with the facts. So, is it reliable for Huang Hongfa to be involved in the incident of abolishing the Prince? Fortunately, this is not an isolated case.
Secondly, Wang Hong, the heir of Ginza, the eighth son of the emperor in Qianlong period, wrote in Huang Qing Tongzhi: "In September (the forty-seventh year of Kangxi), the crown prince, the eldest son of the emperor and the thirteen sons of the emperor were all forbidden." "In November, Shang () violated the peace, and the third son of Emperor Sejong, the fifth son of Emperor, the eighth son of Emperor (original note: Xianjun) and the crown prince were released together." This record shows that in the forty-seventh year of Kangxi, when Emperor Kangxi deposed the Crown Prince for the first time, the Crown Prince Yin Geng, the eldest son of the emperor Yin Ge and the thirteenth son of the emperor Andrew were also banned. Before and after this, the third son of the emperor, the fourth son of the emperor Yin Zhen (later Emperor Sejong), the fifth son of the emperor and the eighth son of the emperor were also banned. That is to say, from the eldest son to the eighth son, except for the premature death of the sixth son, only the seventh son, Ewing, who was indifferent to storage, was not banned. But two months later, Emperor Kangxi released all the princes except Yin Gui, the eldest son, and Huang Tianjun, the thirteenth son, on the grounds of poor health.
There seems to be nothing wrong with this record, and many historians often quote this record when talking about Huang Hongfa's ban. The reason is naturally clear: the author of this book is Yi Yin's heir, and he is a member of the royal family. His records are certainly more authentic than other historical materials. But if you think about it, it may not be true.
I don't have a thorough study of the history of the Qing Dynasty. The reason I understand is that there was a fierce competition for storage during the reign of Kangxi. What's wrong with thirteen? This is a scapegoat. If old four can't trust thirteen, after all, thirteen helps old four with his own body. I inferred this from some books! Not in line with historical responsibility! Hey hey!
I have read many novels of Thirteen, and Thirteen is very good! Hey hey!
Unfortunately, it's a prince. I can't help it!
Don't swear if you are satisfied or dissatisfied! Hey hey!