1. It is recommended that you first check whether it is really an infringement. If it is really an infringement, then stop the infringement.
If there is no infringement, then continue with your behavior.
If you are not sure, it is recommended that you hire a lawyer or find a legal person to check for you whether there is any specific infringement.
2. If the other party files a lawsuit, it is recommended that you hire a lawyer.
Patent litigation is a very troublesome matter.
Example of employee absenteeism warning letter
Inform the production department employee that Xiao Li was absent from work for X days on Lateness, absenteeism and other adverse phenomena.
Xiao Li's arbitrary absenteeism not only seriously affected production, but also seriously violated factory rules and regulations. The company decided to circulate criticism throughout the factory and give him a warning, hoping that he would strengthen his sense of responsibility at work. Follow the attendance system.
In view of the phenomenon of arbitrary absenteeism, the company is hereby issuing a factory-wide report to criticize. We hope that everyone will take it as a warning, abide by the company's factory rules and regulations, strengthen their sense of work responsibility, and avoid arbitrary absenteeism, slowdown and other adverse phenomena. If this happens in the future, Absence of work and other negative behaviors will be severely punished.
Company name, year, month, day...
How to write a complaint
It is recommended to find a lawyer to write a complaint specifically, which will be more standardized. and detailed.
If you plan to write it personally, here is a sample letter of complaint: Sample text: Accuser of the complaint: Xu Moumou Accuser: Li Moumou Accused person: Zhang Moumou Reason for accusation: 1. Against the accused Investigate the person's suspected fraud and investigate his/her criminal responsibility in accordance with the law; 2. Order the accused to return the money owed to the accuser respectively.
Facts and reasons: In May 2009, the accuser Xu Moumou learned through the introduction of his classmate Ye Moumou that the accused person could arrange to participate in an employment interview, and the job content was airport ground handling, but Zhang Moumou claimed It cost 36,000 yuan to participate in the interview. Xu Moumou believed that Zhang Moumou was a teacher in the school's admissions office and would not deceive students.
In May 2009, 36,000 yuan was paid into the bank account of the accused Zhang Moumou from the Agricultural Bank of China near Mapo, Shunyi District, Beijing.
When making the payment, Zhang Moumou accompanied him and wrote a receipt, promising that if he failed the interview, all fees would be refunded within a week.
Zhang Moumou used the form of signing an agreement to conceal his illegal purpose of defrauding the property of the accuser Li Mou.
After remitting the money, Zhang notified Li to fill in information on the Spring Airlines recruitment website, and then asked Li to wait for the interview notice.
When Li did not receive an interview notice from Spring Airlines, Zhang insisted on letting Li attend the interview.
In mid-to-late December 2009, Li participated in an interview with Spring Airlines, but was rejected at the initial review stage and failed to attend the interview at all.
Later, Li asked Zhang to refund the full amount as agreed, but Zhang refused and claimed that if he introduced him to other interviews, he would definitely be able to get a job, but since then Li did not receive any Interview notice.
Under Li’s repeated urging, 80,000 to 5,000 yuan was given.
In June 2010, Li once again asked Zhang to return the fee. Zhang claimed that he would be able to pay it back by the end of September, but it had not yet been returned by the end of September.
During this period, Zhang’s phone was down for a while, causing Li to lose contact with him. After many setbacks, he was able to contact Zhang through the school, but he still delayed and only returned it in December 2010. 1,000 yuan, and there are still 36,000 yuan outstanding.
The accused Zhang Moumou took advantage of his identity as a teacher in the admissions office of his school and the accuser's eagerness to find a job after graduation to defraud the accuser's trust and falsely claimed that he could arrange an employment interview for him. Demand huge fees from the accuser.
But the actual situation is that the accused simply does not have the ability to arrange the required work for him.
When the accuser requested a refund of the fees, the accused denied it in every possible way, used various excuses to evade, acted rogue, shut down the phone, and deliberately avoided the accuser, which shows that he illegally possessed the accuser's property. money and refused to return it.
The accusers Xu and Li were about to graduate. They were eager to find a satisfying job and were deceived by school teachers before they entered society.
As a people’s teacher, the accused Zhang Moumou not only fails to set an example for others, but also extends evil criminal methods to students who are not experienced in the world. It will seriously affect the purity of the people's teaching team, and it will be difficult to protect the legitimate rights and interests of students.
The behavior of the accused Zhang Moumou fully complies with the constituent elements of the crime of fraud stipulated in the criminal law.
Therefore, the accuser specifically requests your bureau to file the case in accordance with the law, investigate and deal with the accused’s criminal behavior, and hopes that the sacred sword of the law can severely punish the accused Zhang Moumou, and he should be investigated for fraud according to the law. criminal liability and order him to return the outstanding fees to safeguard the accuser’s legitimate rights and interests