First, in terms of historical conclusion, Cao Cao is higher than Liu Bei.
1, Cao Cao is a politician, strategist, writer and calligrapher, and the actual founder of Cao Wei regime.
Liu Bei is a politician and the first emperor of Shu Han.
Second, in terms of historical contribution, Cao Cao is higher than Liu Bei.
1, Cao Cao conquered the four kingdoms and made great contributions to the unification of northern China.
2. Liu Bei made no special contribution except establishing the Shu-Han regime.
Third, as far as personal ambition is concerned, Cao Cao is higher than Liu Bei.
1, Cao Cao is fighting for the unification of China.
Liu Bei is a troublemaker, working for the separatist party.
Fourth, Cao Cao is superior to Liu Bei in cultural quality.
1. Cao Cao's poems are innovative, which opened and prospered Jian 'an literature and left valuable spiritual wealth to future generations. History is called Jian 'an style. Lu Xun rated him as "the founder of reform articles".
Liu Bei has made no achievements in the field of culture.
As far as military achievements are concerned, Cao Cao is superior to Liu Bei.
1, Cao Cao defeated Yuan Shao and won the battle of Guandu, which laid the foundation for unifying the north. Although Cao Cao failed in Battle of Red Cliffs, he only gave Shu Han and Wu Dong a breathing space, and still possessed the strength to unify China.
Liu Bei is bent on his own way and eager to avenge Guan Yu. He was defeated by Lu Xun in Yiling, and finally returned to Baidicheng, which weakened Shu Han and gradually declined. As for Battle of Red Cliffs, Liu Bei only took advantage of the fisherman.