Legal analysis: That is to say, the judgment document must be a unified, comprehensive and standardized legal text and be made public, rather than being fragmented and randomly cut. This provision contains the following meanings: First, if the entire civil case should be kept confidential, the judgment document of the case may not be made public; second, if only part of the judgment document of the civil case needs to be kept confidential, if the judgment document of the case Disclosure will not affect the confidentiality of this part, and this part does not need to be disclosed; thirdly, personal information contained in civil judgment documents does not need to be disclosed. The disclosure of civil judgment documents must be different from the disclosure during the trial and the public announcement of the judgment. For all cases that are heard in public, the judgment documents will be made public; for cases that are not heard in public, the judgment documents will not be made public.
Legal basis: "Regulations of the Supreme People's Court on Publication of Judgment Documents by People's Courts on the Internet"
Article 1: People's courts shall publish judgment documents on the Internet in a legal, comprehensive, timely and specification.
Article 2 China Judgment Documents Network is a unified platform for courts across the country to publish judgment documents. People's courts at all levels have set up links to the China Judgment Documents Network on their government affairs websites and judicial disclosure platforms.