Why is this? Because your taste is so bad, your taste is not enough to distinguish between good and bad calligraphy. You only care about whether it looks good on the surface. As long as you can't write it, it looks good.
You can't compete with calligraphers and beggars, so in your mind, beggars' calligraphy is comparable to calligraphers. This statement not only shows that your handwriting taste is poor, but also shows that your IQ and logical ability are poor, because normal people will not draw this conclusion based on this phenomenon.
I can't beat gangsters, I can't beat Bruce Lee, so gangsters can beat Bruce Lee? I can't understand what logic this is. Of course, no one would say that, because the result is obvious.
However, there will always be people who think that liberal arts can say so, because there is no difference anyway. Some people think that copied poems are also very powerful, pretending to be sad is also very sad, and grandiose words are also very strange.
The art of liberal arts will always be misunderstood, because the appreciation of liberal arts has a threshold, which is far from what ordinary people can appreciate at a glance. However, because everyone can write two sentences and read two poems, I think this is just nine Niu Yi hairs.
Not as obvious as a fight. Bruce Lee can kill gangsters as soon as he comes up, and Zou Shiming can beat many people without the strength to fight back. Many people can see this, but many people can't see the difference between beggars and calligraphers, which is why.