I just found out that Philip Burkart is the black body of Otsuka. So many people invited me to answer before, so I chose silence. I saw a judgment about Japanese font copyright before, and Otsuka testified in court and stated the creative process of their team. 1997, the institute sued sheng ze, saying that they copied, and they fought for several years from the primary court to the high court. Although the institute lost the lawsuit, it is undeniable that the latter can learn more, and they have been a bunch of people for several years. To tell the truth, this bold thing is that I copied you and you copied me. You can also say that this is inheritance, and a knife has been ground by a bunch of people. There are only some simplified words in this word difference. After all, the simplified black body has not been polished for a long time, and there are fewer people. It doesn't matter to the public whether you like my "black embellishment" or not. This word was conceived by me, and I think it is the most awesome. For example, as a font designer of Siyuan, A changed with B, B changed with C, and C changed with D, and so on. Who can find out? Who will admit it? At least I think there is a big gap between font designers and the public. You have never made that thing, and you will never know how it was made.
The situation of bold type is a bit like the saying in calligraphy that "regular script is the end of Chinese font". In other words, there will be no new style of writing, which is of course the premise of using a brush as a writing tool. I suggest that you read an important memorandum written by font designer Xu Xuecheng, "Two things worth recording in the history of movable type printing", and you will know that simplifying the design has encountered difficulties.