Which is better to test the qualification certificate of art teachers in high school or junior high school?

The written test is almost the same (except that the students are different in age, but the knowledge points to be remembered are the same). Interview (trial lecture) focuses on different aspects, and junior high school trial lecture focuses on hands-on practice, which requires teachers to make certain demonstrations; High school is relatively theoretical, and it needs to combine a lot of professional knowledge to try out. The qualification examination for senior high school art teachers is not necessarily an appreciation course, but the examination topics are also decided by lots, and its scope includes modeling (Chinese painting, oil painting, calligraphy and watercolor seal cutting), art design (all design categories), animation (introduction and appreciation of short film production), architectural art, photography (news and documentary), arts and crafts (all folk arts and crafts) and new media art (film and television appreciation). High school art trial teaching is completely different from junior high school. Junior high school can use "demonstration" to enrich the course content. High school depends entirely on theory, and it is difficult to pass without a certain foundation. Our major in university is only one aspect (except American education). For example, if you study design, it is more difficult to talk about seal cutting ... it is best to read it in all directions before the exam. In addition, high school can kill junior high school, which is still quite hard.