How to evaluate Yang Dechang?

In fact, we should evaluate a person from many aspects, such as his knowledge, his vision, his pattern, his logic, what he has done in his life and so on. Evaluating a person should be objective, and should be measured from three aspects: common sense ability, character and sentiment, and contribution to the country and mankind. First of all, from the perspective of learning ability, Chairman Mao is a great calligrapher, poet and writer. His calligraphy is a must; We all read his articles when we were students, which are easy to understand; No one can match the spring snow in Qinyuan, which caused a sensation in Chongqing negotiations. He is a great strategist. Isn't Sidu Chishui awesome enough?

As a film and television worker, we judge him more from his works. Yang Dechang has many works in his life, both good and vulgar, so it is very important to examine and evaluate him with a neutral attitude. Look at the problem from a dialectical historical point of view. Everyone has historical limitations, that is, personal limitations and limitations of the background of the times. When it comes to openness, apart from political reasons such as faith, a poor China cooperates openly with imperialist powers just like a laid-off worker talks about economic cooperation with a multimillionaire. Can people talk to you? Can we sit together as equals? Not to mention the hostility of western powers to capitalism at that time.

In fact, no matter what, as long as a person has made his own contribution in the long river of history and contributed his own strength to the development of China film and television, then he should be recognized and praised by the public.

As an audience, we should praise them more. Only in this way can we promote the development of the film industry.