Cannot be used as evidence. Reply opinions are responses to handling matters or conclusions. The evidence is documentary materials, testimonies, investigation and inquiry records, inspection and appraisal opinions, electronic data, etc. that directly confirm the facts of the case. For example, if you complain to the Letters and Calls Bureau that forced demolition is illegal or illegal, the photos and videos of the scene, the on-site inspection records of the public security organs, and the investigation and inquiry transcripts are evidence, but the opinion of the Letters and Calls Bureau replying to whether there is illegal demolition is not evidence and cannot be used by the court. as evidence, but the investigation materials from the Letters and Calls Bureau can be used as evidence. According to the provisions of Article 224 of the Civil Procedure Law, the property portion of legally effective civil judgments and rulings, as well as criminal judgments and rulings, shall be determined by the People's Court of first instance or the People's Court of first instance at the same level as the People's Court of first instance where the property to be executed is located. The People's Court shall enforce it. According to the provisions of the Civil Litigation Interpretation, legally effective rulings on the realization of security rights, rulings on confirmation of mediation agreements, and payment orders shall be executed by the people's court that made the ruling or payment order or by the people's court at the same level where the property subject to execution is located. If a judgment is made that the property is ownerless, the people's court that made the judgment shall take the unowned property back to the state or the collective. Other legal documents that are stipulated by law to be executed by the People's Court shall be executed by the People's Court where the person subject to execution is domiciled or the property subject to execution is located. Judgments, rulings, payment orders, etc. that do not belong to the court's handling opinions cannot be applied for compulsory execution. The court will not accept petition matters. If the petitioner is dissatisfied with the administrative agency's opinion on the handling of the petition matter, he or she may request a review by the higher-level administrative agency that originally handled the administrative agency within 30 days from the date of receipt of the written reply. The administrative agency that receives the review request shall submit review opinions and provide a written reply within 30 days from the date of receipt of the review request. If the petitioner is dissatisfied with the review opinion, he or she may request a review from the administrative agency at the higher level of the review agency within 30 days from the date of receipt of the written reply. The administrative agency that receives the review request shall submit a review opinion within 30 days from the date of receipt of the review request. If the petitioner is dissatisfied with the review opinion and still submits a complaint request based on the same facts and reasons, the petition work agencies and other administrative agencies of the people's governments at all levels will no longer accept the complaint.