The beggar's handwriting in the street is neat. Why is expert criticism worthless? Does art also depend on origin?

I don't know when people will make an evaluation of everything, good or bad, good or bad, high or low, so as to make an estimate of its value. It seems that such behavior can easily define the value of an article or an action. Not to mention whether such behavior is appropriate. If it is judged and defined solely by personal feelings, it is unknown whether such behavior itself can be standardized and fair. In order to make this behavior as fair and standardized as possible, people have specially formulated a series of rules and standards to judge it.

Whether the apple is red or not affects its appearance and value. The choice of tools for processing a coat also determines its quality and value. As a work, whether it is exquisite, whether it has brushwork and whether it has artistic conception can all be used as a standard to judge its merits and values. But now experts have a strange appearance. No matter what they do, some people like to talk about their origins. From the perspective of clothing alone, a piece of clothing may not look good at first sight, but once it is found to be a famous brand, it looks good and looks better and better. This kind of behavior generally occurs in people's daily life, and there are also some discrimination against non-brand names behind it.

What people can't understand is that the same font, when the person who wrote it is a beggar, experts think that such font is worthless. In their view, such works were created at the beginning to make money and have impure purposes, so their value will be reduced. In this case, you may bypass it when you listen to it for the first time, and even think that what the experts say is right. But if you think about it carefully, you will find something unreasonable. The beggar's handwriting in the street is neat. Why does expert criticism have no value, and art also depends on origin?

The same handwriting is worthless for beggars to write because it is written to make money. But artists' writing is very valuable because they have no psychology of making money. This standard seems reasonable and can be standardized, but it is not reasonable. This evaluation links the value of calligraphy works with the identity and purpose of the writer, which makes the relationship between them close, which can be said to be a very unreasonable way.

For those who beg by writing, their hearts must be full of love for writing. Only in this way can we write for decades. No matter what the weather is like, we have been holding on with our broken bodies. Besides those meager incomes, we also have a love in our hearts. But now experts believe that the beggar's heart is impure, the original intention of writing has changed, and such works have low natural value.

Indeed, when we study poetry and calligraphy works, we will interpret them in combination with the author's experience at that time, so as to better understand the feelings and works that the author wants to express. But this does not mean that the author's experience at that time affected the value of the work. An author's life experience is inevitably ups and downs. Should the value of his works change so much?

Furthermore, experts believe that artists' works are very valuable, because in their view, artists' words are pure creations without any impurities. However, many artists did not get the attention of the rulers in their own lives, and were not regarded as artists until after their death. Don't their works lose their value when they are not artists?

No matter what kind of works are created, they are separated from the creators and become independent handicrafts. The standard used to judge its value certainly does not include the author's living conditions at that time. Even though the authors of excellent works have been dead for many years, and even many works can't find their real owners, it doesn't affect their value. As long as its own content can show its Excellence, its value will not be low regardless of the identity of its creator. The beggar's handwriting in the street is neat. Why does expert criticism have no value, and art also depends on origin?

With the development of society, we should abandon the bad habit of judging people by their appearances and judging things by people. But sometimes we have to admit that people's first impressions last for a long time and have great influence. Appearance and clothes have a great influence on people, and people's state also has a great influence on works. Although we don't advocate such behavior, it is undeniable that such behavior does exist.